-
Something wrong with this record ?
Rodent damage to natural and replanted mountain forest regeneration
M. Heroldová, J. Bryja, E. Jánová, J. Suchomel, M. Homolka,
Language English Country England, Great Britain
Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
NLK
Directory of Open Access Journals
from 2001
Free Medical Journals
from 2000
Hindawi Publishing Open Access
from 2000-01-01
PubMed Central
from 2000
Europe PubMed Central
from 2000
ProQuest Central
from 2012-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
from 2000-01-01 to 2012-01-02
Open Access Digital Library
from 2001-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
from 2011-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
from 2012-01-03
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost)
from 2012-01-01
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
from 2012-01-01
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
from 2001
PubMed
22666163
DOI
10.1100/2012/872536
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- MeSH
- Rodentia physiology MeSH
- Trees MeSH
- Animals MeSH
- Check Tag
- Animals MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
Impact of small rodents on mountain forest regeneration was studied in National Nature Reserve in the Beskydy Mountains (Czech Republic). A considerable amount of bark damage was found on young trees (20%) in spring after the peak abundance of field voles (Microtus agrestis) in combination with long winter with heavy snowfall. In contrast, little damage to young trees was noted under high densities of bank voles (Myodes glareolus) with a lower snow cover the following winter. The bark of deciduous trees was more attractive to voles (22% damaged) than conifers (8%). Young trees growing in open and grassy localities suffered more damage from voles than those under canopy of forest stands (χ² = 44.04, P < 0.001). Natural regeneration in Nature Reserve was less damaged compared to planted trees (χ² = 55.89, P < 0.001). The main factors influencing the impact of rodent species on tree regeneration were open, grassy habitat conditions, higher abundance of vole species, tree species preferences- and snow-cover condition. Under these conditions, the impact of rodents on forest regeneration can be predicted. Foresters should prefer natural regeneration to the artificial plantings.
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc13000750
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20130108115848.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 130108s2012 enk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1100/2012/872536 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)22666163
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a enk
- 100 1_
- $a Heroldová, Marta $u Institute of Vertebrate Biology, ASCR, Květná 8, 60365 Brno, Czech Republic. heroldova@ivb.cz
- 245 10
- $a Rodent damage to natural and replanted mountain forest regeneration / $c M. Heroldová, J. Bryja, E. Jánová, J. Suchomel, M. Homolka,
- 520 9_
- $a Impact of small rodents on mountain forest regeneration was studied in National Nature Reserve in the Beskydy Mountains (Czech Republic). A considerable amount of bark damage was found on young trees (20%) in spring after the peak abundance of field voles (Microtus agrestis) in combination with long winter with heavy snowfall. In contrast, little damage to young trees was noted under high densities of bank voles (Myodes glareolus) with a lower snow cover the following winter. The bark of deciduous trees was more attractive to voles (22% damaged) than conifers (8%). Young trees growing in open and grassy localities suffered more damage from voles than those under canopy of forest stands (χ² = 44.04, P < 0.001). Natural regeneration in Nature Reserve was less damaged compared to planted trees (χ² = 55.89, P < 0.001). The main factors influencing the impact of rodent species on tree regeneration were open, grassy habitat conditions, higher abundance of vole species, tree species preferences- and snow-cover condition. Under these conditions, the impact of rodents on forest regeneration can be predicted. Foresters should prefer natural regeneration to the artificial plantings.
- 650 _2
- $a zvířata $7 D000818
- 650 _2
- $a hlodavci $x fyziologie $7 D012377
- 650 _2
- $a stromy $7 D014197
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Bryja, Josef
- 700 1_
- $a Jánová, Eva
- 700 1_
- $a Suchomel, Josef
- 700 1_
- $a Homolka, Miloslav
- 773 0_
- $w MED00181094 $t TheScientificWorldJournal $x 1537-744X $g Roč. 2012(2012), s. 872536
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22666163 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20130108 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20130108111304 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 963532 $s 798914
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2012 $b 2012 $d 872536 $i 1537-744X $m TheScientificWorldJournal $n ScientificWorldJournal $x MED00181094
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20130108