-
Something wrong with this record ?
Approach for measuring the angle of hallux valgus
J. Zhou, P. Hlavacek, B. Xu, W. Chen,
Language English Country India
Document type Journal Article
NLK
Free Medical Journals
from 2007
PubMed Central
from 2007 to 1 year ago
Europe PubMed Central
from 2007
ProQuest Central
from 2008-01-01 to 2019-11-30
Open Access Digital Library
from 2005-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
from 2007-01-01
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
from 2008-01-01 to 2019-11-30
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
BACKGROUND: There is medium correlation between the current anthropometric method and the radiography in the angle of hallux valgus (AoH) measurement, so this study aimed at designing a reliable and more accurate approach to measure the AoH (AoH). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifteen age, body weight, and height matched male students were included and those with foot disorders, deformities, or injuries were excluded from the study. The dorsal protrusions of the first metatarsal and the hallux were marked by palpating from three experienced observers; then their barefoot model in standing was collected by a three dimensional laser scanning system. The AoH was defined in the X-Y plane by the angle between the line joining the marks of centre of head and centre of base of metatarsal shaft and the one connecting the marks of the centre of metatarsal head and the hallux. The same procedure was repeated a week later. Besides, other measures based on the footprint, outline, and the radiography were also available for comparisons. Paired t-test, linear regression, and reliability analysis were applied for statistical analysis with significant level of 0.05 and 95% confidence interval. RESULTS: There were no significant differences recorded between the new method and the radiographic method (P = 0.069). The AoH was superior to the methods of footprint and outline and it displayed a relative higher correlation with the radiographic method (r = 0.94, r (2) = 0.89). Moreover both the inter and intraobserver reliabilities of this method were proved to be good. CONCLUSION: This new method can be used for hallux valgus inspection and evaluation.
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc13024504
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20130710123104.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 130703s2013 ii f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.4103/0019-5413.109875 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)23798759
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a ii
- 100 1_
- $a Zhou, Jin $u National Engineering Laboratory for Clean Technology of Leather Manufacture, Sichuan University Chengdu 610065, P. R. China ; Faculty of Technology, Tomas Bata University, Zlin 760 01, Czech Republic.
- 245 10
- $a Approach for measuring the angle of hallux valgus / $c J. Zhou, P. Hlavacek, B. Xu, W. Chen,
- 520 9_
- $a BACKGROUND: There is medium correlation between the current anthropometric method and the radiography in the angle of hallux valgus (AoH) measurement, so this study aimed at designing a reliable and more accurate approach to measure the AoH (AoH). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifteen age, body weight, and height matched male students were included and those with foot disorders, deformities, or injuries were excluded from the study. The dorsal protrusions of the first metatarsal and the hallux were marked by palpating from three experienced observers; then their barefoot model in standing was collected by a three dimensional laser scanning system. The AoH was defined in the X-Y plane by the angle between the line joining the marks of centre of head and centre of base of metatarsal shaft and the one connecting the marks of the centre of metatarsal head and the hallux. The same procedure was repeated a week later. Besides, other measures based on the footprint, outline, and the radiography were also available for comparisons. Paired t-test, linear regression, and reliability analysis were applied for statistical analysis with significant level of 0.05 and 95% confidence interval. RESULTS: There were no significant differences recorded between the new method and the radiographic method (P = 0.069). The AoH was superior to the methods of footprint and outline and it displayed a relative higher correlation with the radiographic method (r = 0.94, r (2) = 0.89). Moreover both the inter and intraobserver reliabilities of this method were proved to be good. CONCLUSION: This new method can be used for hallux valgus inspection and evaluation.
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Hlavacek, Petr $u -
- 700 1_
- $a Xu, Bo $u -
- 700 1_
- $a Chen, Wuyong $u -
- 773 0_
- $w MED00165266 $t Indian journal of orthopaedics $x 0019-5413 $g Roč. 47, č. 3 (2013), s. 278-82
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23798759 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20130703 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20130710123528 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ind $b bmc $g 988184 $s 822884
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2013 $b 47 $c 3 $d 278-82 $i 0019-5413 $m Indian journal of orthopaedics $n Indian j. orthop. $x MED00165266
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20130703