Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

Comparison of keratometric values and corneal eccentricity

P. Benes, S. Synek, S. Petrová,

. 2013 ; 37 Suppl 1 () : 31-6.

Language English Country Croatia

Document type Comparative Study, Journal Article, Randomized Controlled Trial

The aim of this work is to compare the findings of keratometric values and their differences at various refractive errors. The eccentricity of the cornea in the sense compared to the possible influence of refraction of the eye is topographically observed. Groups of myopia, hyperopia and emmetropia (as a control group) are always represented in total 600 eyes. The studied cohort in total of 300 clients enrolled. Autorefraktokeratometer with Placido disc was used to measure the steepest and the flattest meridian to determine the corneal eccentricity. Group I consisted of 100 myopes, 35 men and 65 women, average age 37.3 years. Objective refraction--sphere: -2.9 D, cylinder: -0.88 D. Keratometry in this group is in the steepest meridian 7.62 mm and the flattest meridian is 7.76 mm. The eccentricity was 0.37. Group II consisting of 100 hyperopic subjects, 40 men and 60 women, average age 61.6 years. Objective refraction--sphere: +2.71 D, cylinder: -1.0 D. Keratometric measurement looks as follows: the steepest meridian is 7.67 mm, the flattest meridian then is 7.81 mm. The value of the eccentricity is 0.37. The third group III consists of 100 emetropic subjects, then clients without refractive errors who achieve without corrective aids Vmin = 1.0. This group is composed of 42 men and 58 women, mean age 41.4 years. Objective refraction--sphere: +0.32 D, cylinder: -0.28 D. The steepest meridian is 7.72 mm the flattest meridian then 7.83 mm. The eccentricity is represented by the observed values of 0.36. Keratometry as well as topography are fundamental methods of corneal anterior surface measurement. Their proportions are essential for the proper parameters selection especially in case of contact lenses as one of the possible means intended to correct refractive errors.

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc13031430
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20131002114338.0
007      
ta
008      
131002s2013 ci f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
035    __
$a (PubMed)23837219
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a ci
100    1_
$a Benes, Pavel $u Faculty of Medicine, Department of Non-medical Branch, Brno, Czech Republic. optika.rubin@seznam.cz
245    10
$a Comparison of keratometric values and corneal eccentricity / $c P. Benes, S. Synek, S. Petrová,
520    9_
$a The aim of this work is to compare the findings of keratometric values and their differences at various refractive errors. The eccentricity of the cornea in the sense compared to the possible influence of refraction of the eye is topographically observed. Groups of myopia, hyperopia and emmetropia (as a control group) are always represented in total 600 eyes. The studied cohort in total of 300 clients enrolled. Autorefraktokeratometer with Placido disc was used to measure the steepest and the flattest meridian to determine the corneal eccentricity. Group I consisted of 100 myopes, 35 men and 65 women, average age 37.3 years. Objective refraction--sphere: -2.9 D, cylinder: -0.88 D. Keratometry in this group is in the steepest meridian 7.62 mm and the flattest meridian is 7.76 mm. The eccentricity was 0.37. Group II consisting of 100 hyperopic subjects, 40 men and 60 women, average age 61.6 years. Objective refraction--sphere: +2.71 D, cylinder: -1.0 D. Keratometric measurement looks as follows: the steepest meridian is 7.67 mm, the flattest meridian then is 7.81 mm. The value of the eccentricity is 0.37. The third group III consists of 100 emetropic subjects, then clients without refractive errors who achieve without corrective aids Vmin = 1.0. This group is composed of 42 men and 58 women, mean age 41.4 years. Objective refraction--sphere: +0.32 D, cylinder: -0.28 D. The steepest meridian is 7.72 mm the flattest meridian then 7.83 mm. The eccentricity is represented by the observed values of 0.36. Keratometry as well as topography are fundamental methods of corneal anterior surface measurement. Their proportions are essential for the proper parameters selection especially in case of contact lenses as one of the possible means intended to correct refractive errors.
650    _2
$a mladiství $7 D000293
650    _2
$a dospělí $7 D000328
650    _2
$a senioři $7 D000368
650    _2
$a senioři nad 80 let $7 D000369
650    _2
$a dítě $7 D002648
650    _2
$a rohovka $x patologie $x patofyziologie $7 D003315
650    _2
$a rohovková topografie $7 D019781
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    _2
$a refrakční vady $x patologie $x patofyziologie $7 D012030
655    _2
$a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a randomizované kontrolované studie $7 D016449
700    1_
$a Synek, Svatopluk $u -
700    1_
$a Petrová, Sylvie $u -
773    0_
$w MED00180201 $t Collegium antropologicum $x 0350-6134 $g Roč. 37 Suppl 1(2013), s. 31-6
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23837219 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20131002 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20131002114855 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 995517 $s 829875
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2013 $b 37 Suppl 1 $d 31-6 $i 0350-6134 $m Collegium antropologicum $n Coll Antropol $x MED00180201
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20131002

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...