Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

Cortical representation of species-specific vocalizations in Guinea pig

D. Suta, J. Popelář, J. Burianová, J. Syka,

. 2013 ; 8 (6) : e65432.

Language English Country United States

Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

We investigated the representation of four typical guinea pig vocalizations in the auditory cortex (AI) in anesthetized guinea pigs with the aim to compare cortical data to the data already published for identical calls in subcortical structures - the inferior colliculus (IC) and medial geniculate body (MGB). Like the subcortical neurons also cortical neurons typically responded to many calls with a time-locked response to one or more temporal elements of the calls. The neuronal response patterns in the AI correlated well with the sound temporal envelope of chirp (an isolated short phrase), but correlated less well in the case of chutter and whistle (longer calls) or purr (a call with a fast repetition rate of phrases). Neuronal rate vs. characteristic frequency profiles provided only a coarse representation of the calls' frequency spectra. A comparison between the activity in the AI and those of subcortical structures showed a different transformation of the neuronal response patterns from the IC to the AI for individual calls: i) while the temporal representation of chirp remained unchanged, the representations of whistle and chutter were transformed at the thalamic level and the response to purr at the cortical level; ii) for the wideband calls (whistle, chirp) the rate representation of the call spectra was preserved in the AI and MGB at the level present in the IC, while in the case of low-frequency calls (chutter, purr), the representation was less precise in the AI and MGB than in the IC; iii) the difference in the response strength to natural and time-reversed whistle was found to be smaller in the AI than in the IC or MGB.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc14050970
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20140402111655.0
007      
ta
008      
140401s2013 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1371/journal.pone.0065432 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)23785425
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Suta, Daniel
245    10
$a Cortical representation of species-specific vocalizations in Guinea pig / $c D. Suta, J. Popelář, J. Burianová, J. Syka,
520    9_
$a We investigated the representation of four typical guinea pig vocalizations in the auditory cortex (AI) in anesthetized guinea pigs with the aim to compare cortical data to the data already published for identical calls in subcortical structures - the inferior colliculus (IC) and medial geniculate body (MGB). Like the subcortical neurons also cortical neurons typically responded to many calls with a time-locked response to one or more temporal elements of the calls. The neuronal response patterns in the AI correlated well with the sound temporal envelope of chirp (an isolated short phrase), but correlated less well in the case of chutter and whistle (longer calls) or purr (a call with a fast repetition rate of phrases). Neuronal rate vs. characteristic frequency profiles provided only a coarse representation of the calls' frequency spectra. A comparison between the activity in the AI and those of subcortical structures showed a different transformation of the neuronal response patterns from the IC to the AI for individual calls: i) while the temporal representation of chirp remained unchanged, the representations of whistle and chutter were transformed at the thalamic level and the response to purr at the cortical level; ii) for the wideband calls (whistle, chirp) the rate representation of the call spectra was preserved in the AI and MGB at the level present in the IC, while in the case of low-frequency calls (chutter, purr), the representation was less precise in the AI and MGB than in the IC; iii) the difference in the response strength to natural and time-reversed whistle was found to be smaller in the AI than in the IC or MGB.
650    _2
$a akustická stimulace $7 D000161
650    _2
$a zvířata $7 D000818
650    _2
$a sluchové korové centrum $x fyziologie $7 D001303
650    _2
$a sluchové evokované potenciály $7 D005072
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a morčata $7 D006168
650    _2
$a neurony $x fyziologie $7 D009474
650    _2
$a druhová specificita $7 D013045
650    _2
$a vokalizace zvířat $x fyziologie $7 D014828
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Popelář, Jiří $u -
700    1_
$a Burianová, Jana $u -
700    1_
$a Syka, Josef $u -
773    0_
$w MED00180950 $t PloS one $x 1932-6203 $g Roč. 8, č. 6 (2013), s. e65432
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23785425 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20140401 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20140402111735 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1018106 $s 849550
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2013 $b 8 $c 6 $d e65432 $i 1932-6203 $m PLoS One $n PLoS One $x MED00180950
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20140401

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...