• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Fully automated analytical procedure for propofol determination by sequential injection technique with spectrophotometric and fluorimetric detections

I. Šrámková, CG. Amorim, H. Sklenářová, MC. Montenegro, B. Horstkotte, AN. Araújo, P. Solich,

. 2014 ; 118 (-) : 104-10.

Jazyk angličtina Země Nizozemsko

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc14074474

In this work, an application of an enzymatic reaction for the determination of the highly hydrophobic drug propofol in emulsion dosage form is presented. Emulsions represent a complex and therefore challenging matrix for analysis. Ethanol was used for breakage of a lipid emulsion, which enabled optical detection. A fully automated method based on Sequential Injection Analysis was developed, allowing propofol determination without the requirement of tedious sample pre-treatment. The method was based on spectrophotometric detection after the enzymatic oxidation catalysed by horseradish peroxidase and subsequent coupling with 4-aminoantipyrine leading to a coloured product with an absorbance maximum at 485 nm. This procedure was compared with a simple fluorimetric method, which was based on the direct selective fluorescence emission of propofol in ethanol at 347 nm. Both methods provide comparable validation parameters with linear working ranges of 0.005-0.100 mg mL(-1) and 0.004-0.243 mg mL(-1) for the spectrophotometric and fluorimetric methods, respectively. The detection and quantitation limits achieved with the spectrophotometric method were 0.0016 and 0.0053 mg mL(-1), respectively. The fluorimetric method provided the detection limit of 0.0013 mg mL(-1) and limit of quantitation of 0.0043 mg mL(-1). The RSD did not exceed 5% and 2% (n=10), correspondingly. A sample throughput of approx. 14 h(-1) for the spectrophotometric and 68 h(-1) for the fluorimetric detection was achieved. Both methods proved to be suitable for the determination of propofol in pharmaceutical formulation with average recovery values of 98.1 and 98.5%.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc14074474
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20141009125721.0
007      
ta
008      
141006s2014 ne f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1016/j.talanta.2013.09.059 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)24274276
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a ne
100    1_
$a Šrámková, Ivana $u Department of Analytical Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, Charles University in Prague, Heyrovského 1203, 500 05 Hradec Králové, Czech Republic.
245    10
$a Fully automated analytical procedure for propofol determination by sequential injection technique with spectrophotometric and fluorimetric detections / $c I. Šrámková, CG. Amorim, H. Sklenářová, MC. Montenegro, B. Horstkotte, AN. Araújo, P. Solich,
520    9_
$a In this work, an application of an enzymatic reaction for the determination of the highly hydrophobic drug propofol in emulsion dosage form is presented. Emulsions represent a complex and therefore challenging matrix for analysis. Ethanol was used for breakage of a lipid emulsion, which enabled optical detection. A fully automated method based on Sequential Injection Analysis was developed, allowing propofol determination without the requirement of tedious sample pre-treatment. The method was based on spectrophotometric detection after the enzymatic oxidation catalysed by horseradish peroxidase and subsequent coupling with 4-aminoantipyrine leading to a coloured product with an absorbance maximum at 485 nm. This procedure was compared with a simple fluorimetric method, which was based on the direct selective fluorescence emission of propofol in ethanol at 347 nm. Both methods provide comparable validation parameters with linear working ranges of 0.005-0.100 mg mL(-1) and 0.004-0.243 mg mL(-1) for the spectrophotometric and fluorimetric methods, respectively. The detection and quantitation limits achieved with the spectrophotometric method were 0.0016 and 0.0053 mg mL(-1), respectively. The fluorimetric method provided the detection limit of 0.0013 mg mL(-1) and limit of quantitation of 0.0043 mg mL(-1). The RSD did not exceed 5% and 2% (n=10), correspondingly. A sample throughput of approx. 14 h(-1) for the spectrophotometric and 68 h(-1) for the fluorimetric detection was achieved. Both methods proved to be suitable for the determination of propofol in pharmaceutical formulation with average recovery values of 98.1 and 98.5%.
650    _2
$a ampyron $x metabolismus $7 D000675
650    _2
$a automatizace $7 D001331
650    _2
$a průtoková injekční analýza $x metody $7 D017022
650    _2
$a fluorescence $7 D005453
650    _2
$a fluorometrie $x metody $7 D005470
650    _2
$a křenová peroxidasa $x metabolismus $7 D006735
650    _2
$a indikátory a reagencie $x metabolismus $7 D007202
650    _2
$a propofol $x analýza $7 D015742
650    _2
$a spektrofotometrie ultrafialová $x metody $7 D013056
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Amorim, Célia G $7 gn_A_00005712
700    1_
$a Sklenářová, Hana
700    1_
$a Montenegro, Maria C B M
700    1_
$a Horstkotte, Burkhard
700    1_
$a Araújo, Alberto N $7 gn_A_00008028
700    1_
$a Solich, Petr
773    0_
$w MED00004484 $t Talanta $x 1873-3573 $g Roč. 118, č. - (2014), s. 104-10
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24274276 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20141006 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20141009130110 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1042357 $s 873386
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2014 $b 118 $c - $d 104-10 $i 1873-3573 $m Talanta $n Talanta $x MED00004484
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20141006

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...