-
Something wrong with this record ?
Current treatment methods for long occlusions of the femoropopliteal segment in patients with intermittent claudication: Minireview
J. Fialova, P. Utikal, P. Bachleda, M. Kocher, M. Cerna, K. Vomackova
Language English Country Czech Republic
Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't, Review
NLK
Directory of Open Access Journals
from 2001
Free Medical Journals
from 1998
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost)
from 2007-06-01
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
from 2001
PubMed
23549509
DOI
10.5507/bp.2013.018
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- MeSH
- Femoral Artery surgery MeSH
- Popliteal Artery surgery MeSH
- Blood Vessel Prosthesis MeSH
- Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation methods MeSH
- Endovascular Procedures methods MeSH
- Intermittent Claudication surgery MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Reperfusion methods MeSH
- Vascular Surgical Procedures methods MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
- Review MeSH
UNLABELLED: Backround. Intermittent claudication is a classic symptom of peripheral arterial disease. It is mainly treated conservatively but if this fails, a form of revascularization is indicated. The revascularization in chronic occlusion of femoropopliteal region is currently performed by two basic methods: the standard method of surgical bypass and the newer miniinvasive alternative represented by the endovascular method. The treatment of patients with solely claudication and long occlusion of femoropopliteal region remains controversial. The aim of this minireview was to determine whether surgical bypass is still the best method of choice in a time of endovascular techniques. METHODS: A MEDLINE search for original and review articles using key terms, intermittent claudication and long femoropopliteal oclusion. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: No ideal treatment for long occlusions of the femoropopliteal segment has been established to date. It is clear that the role of endovascular techniques in the treatment of SFA occlusions is increasing. It remains that, lower risk patients with claudication should be examined to assess the quality of veins suitable for revascularization and bypass should be selected as the first method of choice.
Department of Radiology University Hospital Olomouc
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc17006087
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20170308085050.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 170210s2015 xr f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.5507/bp.2013.018 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)23549509
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xr
- 100 1_
- $a Fialová, Jana $u Department of Surgery II - Vascular and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital Olomouc, Czech Republic $7 xx0092220
- 245 10
- $a Current treatment methods for long occlusions of the femoropopliteal segment in patients with intermittent claudication: Minireview / $c J. Fialova, P. Utikal, P. Bachleda, M. Kocher, M. Cerna, K. Vomackova
- 520 9_
- $a UNLABELLED: Backround. Intermittent claudication is a classic symptom of peripheral arterial disease. It is mainly treated conservatively but if this fails, a form of revascularization is indicated. The revascularization in chronic occlusion of femoropopliteal region is currently performed by two basic methods: the standard method of surgical bypass and the newer miniinvasive alternative represented by the endovascular method. The treatment of patients with solely claudication and long occlusion of femoropopliteal region remains controversial. The aim of this minireview was to determine whether surgical bypass is still the best method of choice in a time of endovascular techniques. METHODS: A MEDLINE search for original and review articles using key terms, intermittent claudication and long femoropopliteal oclusion. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: No ideal treatment for long occlusions of the femoropopliteal segment has been established to date. It is clear that the role of endovascular techniques in the treatment of SFA occlusions is increasing. It remains that, lower risk patients with claudication should be examined to assess the quality of veins suitable for revascularization and bypass should be selected as the first method of choice.
- 650 _2
- $a cévní protézy $7 D001807
- 650 _2
- $a cévy - implantace protéz $x metody $7 D019917
- 650 _2
- $a endovaskulární výkony $x metody $7 D057510
- 650 _2
- $a arteria femoralis $x chirurgie $7 D005263
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a intermitentní klaudikace $x chirurgie $7 D007383
- 650 _2
- $a arteria poplitea $x chirurgie $7 D011150
- 650 _2
- $a reperfuze $x metody $7 D015424
- 650 _2
- $a výkony cévní chirurgie $x metody $7 D014656
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 655 _2
- $a přehledy $7 D016454
- 700 1_
- $a Utíkal, Petr $u Department of Surgery II - Vascular and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital Olomouc, Czech Republic $7 xx0019314
- 700 1_
- $a Bachleda, Petr, $u Department of Surgery II - Vascular and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital Olomouc, Czech Republic $d 1954- $7 jn20020716344
- 700 1_
- $a Köcher, Martin $u Department of Radiology, University Hospital Olomouc $7 jn20010309197
- 700 1_
- $a Černá, Marie $u Department of Radiology, University Hospital Olomouc $7 xx0105930
- 700 1_
- $a Vomáčková, Katherine $u Department of Surgery I, University Hospital Olomouc $7 xx0142837
- 773 0_
- $w MED00012606 $t Biomedical papers of the Medical Faculty of the University Palacky, Olomouc, Czech Republic $x 1213-8118 $g Roč. 159, č. 2 (2015), s. 203-207
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b A 1502 $c 958 $y 4 $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20170210 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20170223144237 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1192612 $s 966734
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2015 $b 159 $c 2 $d 203-207 $e 20130325 $i 1213-8118 $m Biomedical papers of the Medical Faculty of the University Palacký, Olomouc Czech Republic $n Biomed. Pap. Fac. Med. Palacký Univ. Olomouc Czech Repub. (Print) $x MED00012606
- LZP __
- $b NLK118 $a Pubmed-20170210