• Something wrong with this record ?

Is the Emotional Dog Blind to Its Choices

MA. Vranka, Š. Bahník,

. 2016 ; 63 (3) : 180-8.

Language English Country Germany

Document type Journal Article

Persistent link   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc17013672

Previous choice blindness studies showed that people sometimes fail to notice when their choice is changed. Subsequently, they are willing to provide reasons for the manipulated choice which is the opposite of the one they made just seconds ago. In the present study, participants first made binary judgments about the wrongness of described behaviors and then were shown an opposite answer during a second reading of some of the descriptions. Half of the participants saw the answer during the second presentation of the description and the other half saw it only after the presentation. Based on Haidt's Social intuitionist model, we hypothesized that participants in the latter group would be less likely to reconcile their intuition with the presented answer and thus they would be more likely to reject it. However, we found no difference between the groups.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc17013672
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20170509105609.0
007      
ta
008      
170413s2016 gw f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1027/1618-3169/a000325 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)27404986
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a gw
100    1_
$a Vranka, Marek A $u 1 Department of Psychology, Faculty of Arts, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
245    10
$a Is the Emotional Dog Blind to Its Choices / $c MA. Vranka, Š. Bahník,
520    9_
$a Previous choice blindness studies showed that people sometimes fail to notice when their choice is changed. Subsequently, they are willing to provide reasons for the manipulated choice which is the opposite of the one they made just seconds ago. In the present study, participants first made binary judgments about the wrongness of described behaviors and then were shown an opposite answer during a second reading of some of the descriptions. Half of the participants saw the answer during the second presentation of the description and the other half saw it only after the presentation. Based on Haidt's Social intuitionist model, we hypothesized that participants in the latter group would be less likely to reconcile their intuition with the presented answer and thus they would be more likely to reject it. However, we found no difference between the groups.
650    _2
$a dospělí $7 D000328
650    _2
$a zvířata $7 D000818
650    12
$a výběrové chování $7 D002755
650    _2
$a psi $x psychologie $7 D004285
650    12
$a emoce $7 D004644
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    12
$a intuice $7 D019545
650    _2
$a mínění $7 D007600
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    12
$a krátkodobá paměť $7 D008570
650    _2
$a studenti $x psychologie $7 D013334
650    _2
$a mladý dospělý $7 D055815
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Bahník, Štěpán $u 2 Department of Psychology, University of Würzburg, Germany.
773    0_
$w MED00191575 $t Experimental psychology $x 2190-5142 $g Roč. 63, č. 3 (2016), s. 180-8
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27404986 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20170413 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20170509105945 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1200137 $s 974450
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2016 $b 63 $c 3 $d 180-8 $i 2190-5142 $m Experimental psychology $n Exp Psychol $x MED00191575
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20170413

Find record

Citation metrics

Archiving options