-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Bioassay battery interlaboratory investigation of emerging contaminants in spiked water extracts - Towards the implementation of bioanalytical monitoring tools in water quality assessment and monitoring
C. Di Paolo, R. Ottermanns, S. Keiter, S. Ait-Aissa, K. Bluhm, W. Brack, M. Breitholtz, S. Buchinger, M. Carere, C. Chalon, X. Cousin, V. Dulio, BI. Escher, T. Hamers, K. Hilscherová, S. Jarque, A. Jonas, E. Maillot-Marechal, Y. Marneffe, MT....
Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
Odkazy
PubMed
27585427
DOI
10.1016/j.watres.2016.08.018
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- biotest MeSH
- chemické látky znečišťující vodu MeSH
- čištění vody MeSH
- kvalita vody * MeSH
- monitorování životního prostředí MeSH
- voda * MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Check Tag
- zvířata MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
Bioassays are particularly useful tools to link the chemical and ecological assessments in water quality monitoring. Different methods cover a broad range of toxicity mechanisms in diverse organisms, and account for risks posed by non-target compounds and mixtures. Many tests are already applied in chemical and waste assessments, and stakeholders from the science-police interface have recommended their integration in regulatory water quality monitoring. Still, there is a need to address bioassay suitability to evaluate water samples containing emerging pollutants, which are a current priority in water quality monitoring. The presented interlaboratory study (ILS) verified whether a battery of miniaturized bioassays, conducted in 11 different laboratories following their own protocols, would produce comparable results when applied to evaluate blinded samples consisting of a pristine water extract spiked with four emerging pollutants as single chemicals or mixtures, i.e. triclosan, acridine, 17α-ethinylestradiol (EE2) and 3-nitrobenzanthrone (3-NBA). Assays evaluated effects on aquatic organisms from three different trophic levels (algae, daphnids, zebrafish embryos) and mechanism-specific effects using in vitro estrogenicity (ER-Luc, YES) and mutagenicity (Ames fluctuation) assays. The test battery presented complementary sensitivity and specificity to evaluate the different blinded water extract spikes. Aquatic organisms differed in terms of sensitivity to triclosan (algae > daphnids > fish) and acridine (fish > daphnids > algae) spikes, confirming the complementary role of the three taxa for water quality assessment. Estrogenicity and mutagenicity assays identified with high precision the respective mechanism-specific effects of spikes even when non-specific toxicity occurred in mixture. For estrogenicity, although differences were observed between assays and models, EE2 spike relative induction EC50 values were comparable to the literature, and E2/EE2 equivalency factors reliably reflected the sample content. In the Ames, strong revertant induction occurred following 3-NBA spike incubation with the TA98 strain, which was of lower magnitude after metabolic transformation and when compared to TA100. Differences in experimental protocols, model organisms, and data analysis can be sources of variation, indicating that respective harmonized standard procedures should be followed when implementing bioassays in water monitoring. Together with other ongoing activities for the validation of a basic bioassay battery, the present study is an important step towards the implementation of bioanalytical monitoring tools in water quality assessment and monitoring.
Centre for Applied Geosciences Eberhard Karls University Tübingen Germany
Department Biochemistry and Ecotoxicology Federal Institute of Hydrology Koblenz Germany
Department of Applied Environmental Science ITM Stockholm University Stockholm Sweden
INERIS Verneuil en Halatte France
Institute for Environmental Research RWTH Aachen University Aachen Germany
Institute for Environmental Studies IVM VU University Amsterdam The Netherlands
Italian Institute of Health Rome Italy
Laboratoire d'Ecotoxicologie Ifremer L'Houmeau France
Laboratoire de Physiologie et Génétique des Poissons Inra Rennes France
Swiss Centre for Applied Ecotoxicology Eawag EPFL Dübendorf Switzerland
UFZ Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research Leipzig Germany
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc17023736
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20170720123549.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 170720s2016 enk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1016/j.watres.2016.08.018 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)27585427
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a enk
- 100 1_
- $a Di Paolo, Carolina $u Institute for Environmental Research, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
- 245 10
- $a Bioassay battery interlaboratory investigation of emerging contaminants in spiked water extracts - Towards the implementation of bioanalytical monitoring tools in water quality assessment and monitoring / $c C. Di Paolo, R. Ottermanns, S. Keiter, S. Ait-Aissa, K. Bluhm, W. Brack, M. Breitholtz, S. Buchinger, M. Carere, C. Chalon, X. Cousin, V. Dulio, BI. Escher, T. Hamers, K. Hilscherová, S. Jarque, A. Jonas, E. Maillot-Marechal, Y. Marneffe, MT. Nguyen, P. Pandard, A. Schifferli, T. Schulze, S. Seidensticker, TB. Seiler, J. Tang, R. van der Oost, E. Vermeirssen, R. Zounková, N. Zwart, H. Hollert,
- 520 9_
- $a Bioassays are particularly useful tools to link the chemical and ecological assessments in water quality monitoring. Different methods cover a broad range of toxicity mechanisms in diverse organisms, and account for risks posed by non-target compounds and mixtures. Many tests are already applied in chemical and waste assessments, and stakeholders from the science-police interface have recommended their integration in regulatory water quality monitoring. Still, there is a need to address bioassay suitability to evaluate water samples containing emerging pollutants, which are a current priority in water quality monitoring. The presented interlaboratory study (ILS) verified whether a battery of miniaturized bioassays, conducted in 11 different laboratories following their own protocols, would produce comparable results when applied to evaluate blinded samples consisting of a pristine water extract spiked with four emerging pollutants as single chemicals or mixtures, i.e. triclosan, acridine, 17α-ethinylestradiol (EE2) and 3-nitrobenzanthrone (3-NBA). Assays evaluated effects on aquatic organisms from three different trophic levels (algae, daphnids, zebrafish embryos) and mechanism-specific effects using in vitro estrogenicity (ER-Luc, YES) and mutagenicity (Ames fluctuation) assays. The test battery presented complementary sensitivity and specificity to evaluate the different blinded water extract spikes. Aquatic organisms differed in terms of sensitivity to triclosan (algae > daphnids > fish) and acridine (fish > daphnids > algae) spikes, confirming the complementary role of the three taxa for water quality assessment. Estrogenicity and mutagenicity assays identified with high precision the respective mechanism-specific effects of spikes even when non-specific toxicity occurred in mixture. For estrogenicity, although differences were observed between assays and models, EE2 spike relative induction EC50 values were comparable to the literature, and E2/EE2 equivalency factors reliably reflected the sample content. In the Ames, strong revertant induction occurred following 3-NBA spike incubation with the TA98 strain, which was of lower magnitude after metabolic transformation and when compared to TA100. Differences in experimental protocols, model organisms, and data analysis can be sources of variation, indicating that respective harmonized standard procedures should be followed when implementing bioassays in water monitoring. Together with other ongoing activities for the validation of a basic bioassay battery, the present study is an important step towards the implementation of bioanalytical monitoring tools in water quality assessment and monitoring.
- 650 _2
- $a zvířata $7 D000818
- 650 _2
- $a biotest $7 D001681
- 650 _2
- $a monitorování životního prostředí $7 D004784
- 650 12
- $a voda $7 D014867
- 650 _2
- $a chemické látky znečišťující vodu $7 D014874
- 650 _2
- $a čištění vody $7 D018508
- 650 12
- $a kvalita vody $7 D060753
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Ottermanns, Richard $u Institute for Environmental Research, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
- 700 1_
- $a Keiter, Steffen $u Institute for Environmental Research, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany; Man-Technology-Environment Research Centre, School of Science and Technology, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.
- 700 1_
- $a Ait-Aissa, Selim $u INERIS, Verneuil-en-Halatte, France. $7 gn_A_00002713
- 700 1_
- $a Bluhm, Kerstin $u Institute for Environmental Research, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
- 700 1_
- $a Brack, Werner $u UFZ-Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research, Leipzig, Germany.
- 700 1_
- $a Breitholtz, Magnus $u Department of Applied Environmental Science - ITM, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
- 700 1_
- $a Buchinger, Sebastian $u Department Biochemistry and Ecotoxicology, Federal Institute of Hydrology, Koblenz, Germany.
- 700 1_
- $a Carere, Mario $u Italian Institute of Health, Rome, Italy.
- 700 1_
- $a Chalon, Carole $u ISSeP (Scientific Institute of Public Service), Liège, Wallonia, Belgium.
- 700 1_
- $a Cousin, Xavier $u Laboratoire d'Ecotoxicologie, Ifremer, L'Houmeau, France; Laboratoire de Physiologie et Génétique des Poissons, Inra, Rennes, France.
- 700 1_
- $a Dulio, Valeria $u INERIS, Verneuil-en-Halatte, France.
- 700 1_
- $a Escher, Beate I $u UFZ-Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research, Leipzig, Germany; National Research Centre for Environmental Toxicology - Entox, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia; Centre for Applied Geosciences, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Germany.
- 700 1_
- $a Hamers, Timo $u Institute for Environmental Studies -IVM, VU University Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
- 700 1_
- $a Hilscherová, Klára $u Research Centre for Toxic Compounds in the Environment - RECETOX, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Jarque, Sergio $u Research Centre for Toxic Compounds in the Environment - RECETOX, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Jonas, Adam $u Research Centre for Toxic Compounds in the Environment - RECETOX, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Maillot-Marechal, Emmanuelle $u INERIS, Verneuil-en-Halatte, France.
- 700 1_
- $a Marneffe, Yves $u ISSeP (Scientific Institute of Public Service), Liège, Wallonia, Belgium.
- 700 1_
- $a Nguyen, Mai Thao $u Waterproef Laboratory, Edam, The Netherlands.
- 700 1_
- $a Pandard, Pascal $u INERIS, Verneuil-en-Halatte, France.
- 700 1_
- $a Schifferli, Andrea $u Swiss Centre for Applied Ecotoxicology Eawag-EPFL, Dübendorf, Switzerland.
- 700 1_
- $a Schulze, Tobias $u UFZ-Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research, Leipzig, Germany.
- 700 1_
- $a Seidensticker, Sven $u Institute for Environmental Research, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany; Centre for Applied Geosciences, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Germany.
- 700 1_
- $a Seiler, Thomas-Benjamin $u Institute for Environmental Research, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
- 700 1_
- $a Tang, Janet $u National Research Centre for Environmental Toxicology - Entox, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
- 700 1_
- $a van der Oost, Ron $u WATERNET Institute for the Urban Water Cycle, Division of Technology Research & Engineering, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
- 700 1_
- $a Vermeirssen, Etienne $u Swiss Centre for Applied Ecotoxicology Eawag-EPFL, Dübendorf, Switzerland.
- 700 1_
- $a Zounková, Radka $u Research Centre for Toxic Compounds in the Environment - RECETOX, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Zwart, Nick $u Institute for Environmental Studies -IVM, VU University Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
- 700 1_
- $a Hollert, Henner $u Institute for Environmental Research, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany. Electronic address: henner.hollert@bio5.rwth-aachen.de.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00008324 $t Water research $x 1879-2448 $g Roč. 104, č. - (2016), s. 473-484
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27585427 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20170720 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20170720124042 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1239417 $s 984649
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2016 $b 104 $c - $d 473-484 $e 20160812 $i 1879-2448 $m Water research $n Water Res $x MED00008324
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20170720