• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Bioassay battery interlaboratory investigation of emerging contaminants in spiked water extracts - Towards the implementation of bioanalytical monitoring tools in water quality assessment and monitoring

C. Di Paolo, R. Ottermanns, S. Keiter, S. Ait-Aissa, K. Bluhm, W. Brack, M. Breitholtz, S. Buchinger, M. Carere, C. Chalon, X. Cousin, V. Dulio, BI. Escher, T. Hamers, K. Hilscherová, S. Jarque, A. Jonas, E. Maillot-Marechal, Y. Marneffe, MT....

. 2016 ; 104 (-) : 473-484. [pub] 20160812

Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc17023736

Bioassays are particularly useful tools to link the chemical and ecological assessments in water quality monitoring. Different methods cover a broad range of toxicity mechanisms in diverse organisms, and account for risks posed by non-target compounds and mixtures. Many tests are already applied in chemical and waste assessments, and stakeholders from the science-police interface have recommended their integration in regulatory water quality monitoring. Still, there is a need to address bioassay suitability to evaluate water samples containing emerging pollutants, which are a current priority in water quality monitoring. The presented interlaboratory study (ILS) verified whether a battery of miniaturized bioassays, conducted in 11 different laboratories following their own protocols, would produce comparable results when applied to evaluate blinded samples consisting of a pristine water extract spiked with four emerging pollutants as single chemicals or mixtures, i.e. triclosan, acridine, 17α-ethinylestradiol (EE2) and 3-nitrobenzanthrone (3-NBA). Assays evaluated effects on aquatic organisms from three different trophic levels (algae, daphnids, zebrafish embryos) and mechanism-specific effects using in vitro estrogenicity (ER-Luc, YES) and mutagenicity (Ames fluctuation) assays. The test battery presented complementary sensitivity and specificity to evaluate the different blinded water extract spikes. Aquatic organisms differed in terms of sensitivity to triclosan (algae > daphnids > fish) and acridine (fish > daphnids > algae) spikes, confirming the complementary role of the three taxa for water quality assessment. Estrogenicity and mutagenicity assays identified with high precision the respective mechanism-specific effects of spikes even when non-specific toxicity occurred in mixture. For estrogenicity, although differences were observed between assays and models, EE2 spike relative induction EC50 values were comparable to the literature, and E2/EE2 equivalency factors reliably reflected the sample content. In the Ames, strong revertant induction occurred following 3-NBA spike incubation with the TA98 strain, which was of lower magnitude after metabolic transformation and when compared to TA100. Differences in experimental protocols, model organisms, and data analysis can be sources of variation, indicating that respective harmonized standard procedures should be followed when implementing bioassays in water monitoring. Together with other ongoing activities for the validation of a basic bioassay battery, the present study is an important step towards the implementation of bioanalytical monitoring tools in water quality assessment and monitoring.

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc17023736
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20170720123549.0
007      
ta
008      
170720s2016 enk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1016/j.watres.2016.08.018 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)27585427
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a enk
100    1_
$a Di Paolo, Carolina $u Institute for Environmental Research, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
245    10
$a Bioassay battery interlaboratory investigation of emerging contaminants in spiked water extracts - Towards the implementation of bioanalytical monitoring tools in water quality assessment and monitoring / $c C. Di Paolo, R. Ottermanns, S. Keiter, S. Ait-Aissa, K. Bluhm, W. Brack, M. Breitholtz, S. Buchinger, M. Carere, C. Chalon, X. Cousin, V. Dulio, BI. Escher, T. Hamers, K. Hilscherová, S. Jarque, A. Jonas, E. Maillot-Marechal, Y. Marneffe, MT. Nguyen, P. Pandard, A. Schifferli, T. Schulze, S. Seidensticker, TB. Seiler, J. Tang, R. van der Oost, E. Vermeirssen, R. Zounková, N. Zwart, H. Hollert,
520    9_
$a Bioassays are particularly useful tools to link the chemical and ecological assessments in water quality monitoring. Different methods cover a broad range of toxicity mechanisms in diverse organisms, and account for risks posed by non-target compounds and mixtures. Many tests are already applied in chemical and waste assessments, and stakeholders from the science-police interface have recommended their integration in regulatory water quality monitoring. Still, there is a need to address bioassay suitability to evaluate water samples containing emerging pollutants, which are a current priority in water quality monitoring. The presented interlaboratory study (ILS) verified whether a battery of miniaturized bioassays, conducted in 11 different laboratories following their own protocols, would produce comparable results when applied to evaluate blinded samples consisting of a pristine water extract spiked with four emerging pollutants as single chemicals or mixtures, i.e. triclosan, acridine, 17α-ethinylestradiol (EE2) and 3-nitrobenzanthrone (3-NBA). Assays evaluated effects on aquatic organisms from three different trophic levels (algae, daphnids, zebrafish embryos) and mechanism-specific effects using in vitro estrogenicity (ER-Luc, YES) and mutagenicity (Ames fluctuation) assays. The test battery presented complementary sensitivity and specificity to evaluate the different blinded water extract spikes. Aquatic organisms differed in terms of sensitivity to triclosan (algae > daphnids > fish) and acridine (fish > daphnids > algae) spikes, confirming the complementary role of the three taxa for water quality assessment. Estrogenicity and mutagenicity assays identified with high precision the respective mechanism-specific effects of spikes even when non-specific toxicity occurred in mixture. For estrogenicity, although differences were observed between assays and models, EE2 spike relative induction EC50 values were comparable to the literature, and E2/EE2 equivalency factors reliably reflected the sample content. In the Ames, strong revertant induction occurred following 3-NBA spike incubation with the TA98 strain, which was of lower magnitude after metabolic transformation and when compared to TA100. Differences in experimental protocols, model organisms, and data analysis can be sources of variation, indicating that respective harmonized standard procedures should be followed when implementing bioassays in water monitoring. Together with other ongoing activities for the validation of a basic bioassay battery, the present study is an important step towards the implementation of bioanalytical monitoring tools in water quality assessment and monitoring.
650    _2
$a zvířata $7 D000818
650    _2
$a biotest $7 D001681
650    _2
$a monitorování životního prostředí $7 D004784
650    12
$a voda $7 D014867
650    _2
$a chemické látky znečišťující vodu $7 D014874
650    _2
$a čištění vody $7 D018508
650    12
$a kvalita vody $7 D060753
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Ottermanns, Richard $u Institute for Environmental Research, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
700    1_
$a Keiter, Steffen $u Institute for Environmental Research, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany; Man-Technology-Environment Research Centre, School of Science and Technology, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.
700    1_
$a Ait-Aissa, Selim $u INERIS, Verneuil-en-Halatte, France. $7 gn_A_00002713
700    1_
$a Bluhm, Kerstin $u Institute for Environmental Research, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
700    1_
$a Brack, Werner $u UFZ-Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research, Leipzig, Germany.
700    1_
$a Breitholtz, Magnus $u Department of Applied Environmental Science - ITM, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
700    1_
$a Buchinger, Sebastian $u Department Biochemistry and Ecotoxicology, Federal Institute of Hydrology, Koblenz, Germany.
700    1_
$a Carere, Mario $u Italian Institute of Health, Rome, Italy.
700    1_
$a Chalon, Carole $u ISSeP (Scientific Institute of Public Service), Liège, Wallonia, Belgium.
700    1_
$a Cousin, Xavier $u Laboratoire d'Ecotoxicologie, Ifremer, L'Houmeau, France; Laboratoire de Physiologie et Génétique des Poissons, Inra, Rennes, France.
700    1_
$a Dulio, Valeria $u INERIS, Verneuil-en-Halatte, France.
700    1_
$a Escher, Beate I $u UFZ-Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research, Leipzig, Germany; National Research Centre for Environmental Toxicology - Entox, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia; Centre for Applied Geosciences, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Germany.
700    1_
$a Hamers, Timo $u Institute for Environmental Studies -IVM, VU University Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
700    1_
$a Hilscherová, Klára $u Research Centre for Toxic Compounds in the Environment - RECETOX, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Jarque, Sergio $u Research Centre for Toxic Compounds in the Environment - RECETOX, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Jonas, Adam $u Research Centre for Toxic Compounds in the Environment - RECETOX, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Maillot-Marechal, Emmanuelle $u INERIS, Verneuil-en-Halatte, France.
700    1_
$a Marneffe, Yves $u ISSeP (Scientific Institute of Public Service), Liège, Wallonia, Belgium.
700    1_
$a Nguyen, Mai Thao $u Waterproef Laboratory, Edam, The Netherlands.
700    1_
$a Pandard, Pascal $u INERIS, Verneuil-en-Halatte, France.
700    1_
$a Schifferli, Andrea $u Swiss Centre for Applied Ecotoxicology Eawag-EPFL, Dübendorf, Switzerland.
700    1_
$a Schulze, Tobias $u UFZ-Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research, Leipzig, Germany.
700    1_
$a Seidensticker, Sven $u Institute for Environmental Research, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany; Centre for Applied Geosciences, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Germany.
700    1_
$a Seiler, Thomas-Benjamin $u Institute for Environmental Research, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
700    1_
$a Tang, Janet $u National Research Centre for Environmental Toxicology - Entox, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
700    1_
$a van der Oost, Ron $u WATERNET Institute for the Urban Water Cycle, Division of Technology Research & Engineering, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
700    1_
$a Vermeirssen, Etienne $u Swiss Centre for Applied Ecotoxicology Eawag-EPFL, Dübendorf, Switzerland.
700    1_
$a Zounková, Radka $u Research Centre for Toxic Compounds in the Environment - RECETOX, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Zwart, Nick $u Institute for Environmental Studies -IVM, VU University Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
700    1_
$a Hollert, Henner $u Institute for Environmental Research, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany. Electronic address: henner.hollert@bio5.rwth-aachen.de.
773    0_
$w MED00008324 $t Water research $x 1879-2448 $g Roč. 104, č. - (2016), s. 473-484
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27585427 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20170720 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20170720124042 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1239417 $s 984649
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2016 $b 104 $c - $d 473-484 $e 20160812 $i 1879-2448 $m Water research $n Water Res $x MED00008324
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20170720

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Možnosti archivace