Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

Leishmania donovani development in Phlebotomus argentipes: comparison of promastigote- and amastigote-initiated infections

J. Sadlova, J. Myskova, T. Lestinova, J. Votypka, M. Yeo, P. Volf,

. 2017 ; 144 (4) : 403-410. [pub] 20161123

Language English Country England, Great Britain

Document type Journal Article

Leishmania parasites alternate in their life cycle between promastigote stages that develop in the gut of phlebotomine sand flies and amastigotes residing inside phagocytic cells of vertebrate hosts. For experimental infections of sand flies, promastigotes are frequently used as this way of infection is technically easier although ingestion of promastigotes by sand flies is unnatural. Here we aimed to answer a critical question, to what extent do promastigote-initiated experimental infections differ from those initiated with intracellular amastigotes. We performed side-by-side comparison of Leishmania development in Phlebotomus argentipes females infected alternatively with promastigotes from log-phase cultures or amastigotes grown ex vivo in macrophages. Early stage infections showed substantial differences in parasite load and representation of morphological forms. The differences disappeared along the maturation of infections; both groups developed heavy late-stage infections with colonization of the stomodeal valve, uniform representation of infective metacyclics and equal efficiency of transmission. The results showed that studies focusing on early phase of Leishmania development in sand flies should be initiated with intracellular amastigotes. However, the use of promastigote stages for sand fly infections does not alter significantly the final outcome of Leishmania donovani development in P. argentipes and their transmissibility to the vertebrate host.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc17031274
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20171025115445.0
007      
ta
008      
171025s2017 enk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1017/S0031182016002067 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)27876097
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a enk
100    1_
$a Sadlova, Jovana $u Department of Parasitology,Faculty of Science,Charles University,Vinicna 7, 128 44 Prague 2,Czech Republic.
245    10
$a Leishmania donovani development in Phlebotomus argentipes: comparison of promastigote- and amastigote-initiated infections / $c J. Sadlova, J. Myskova, T. Lestinova, J. Votypka, M. Yeo, P. Volf,
520    9_
$a Leishmania parasites alternate in their life cycle between promastigote stages that develop in the gut of phlebotomine sand flies and amastigotes residing inside phagocytic cells of vertebrate hosts. For experimental infections of sand flies, promastigotes are frequently used as this way of infection is technically easier although ingestion of promastigotes by sand flies is unnatural. Here we aimed to answer a critical question, to what extent do promastigote-initiated experimental infections differ from those initiated with intracellular amastigotes. We performed side-by-side comparison of Leishmania development in Phlebotomus argentipes females infected alternatively with promastigotes from log-phase cultures or amastigotes grown ex vivo in macrophages. Early stage infections showed substantial differences in parasite load and representation of morphological forms. The differences disappeared along the maturation of infections; both groups developed heavy late-stage infections with colonization of the stomodeal valve, uniform representation of infective metacyclics and equal efficiency of transmission. The results showed that studies focusing on early phase of Leishmania development in sand flies should be initiated with intracellular amastigotes. However, the use of promastigote stages for sand fly infections does not alter significantly the final outcome of Leishmania donovani development in P. argentipes and their transmissibility to the vertebrate host.
650    _2
$a zvířata $7 D000818
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a interakce hostitele a parazita $7 D006790
650    _2
$a hmyz - vektory $x parazitologie $7 D007303
650    _2
$a Leishmania donovani $x růst a vývoj $7 D007893
650    _2
$a leishmanióza viscerální $x parazitologie $x přenos $7 D007898
650    _2
$a myši $7 D051379
650    _2
$a myši inbrední BALB C $7 D008807
650    _2
$a Phlebotomus $x parazitologie $7 D010691
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Myskova, Jitka $u Department of Parasitology,Faculty of Science,Charles University,Vinicna 7, 128 44 Prague 2,Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Lestinova, Tereza $u Department of Parasitology,Faculty of Science,Charles University,Vinicna 7, 128 44 Prague 2,Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Votypka, Jan $u Department of Parasitology,Faculty of Science,Charles University,Vinicna 7, 128 44 Prague 2,Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Yeo, Matthew $u Department of Pathogen Molecular Biology,Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases,London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine,Keppel Street, WC1E 7HTLondon,UK.
700    1_
$a Volf, Petr $u Department of Parasitology,Faculty of Science,Charles University,Vinicna 7, 128 44 Prague 2,Czech Republic.
773    0_
$w MED00010377 $t Parasitology $x 1469-8161 $g Roč. 144, č. 4 (2017), s. 403-410
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27876097 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20171025 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20171025115528 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1254867 $s 992301
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2017 $b 144 $c 4 $d 403-410 $e 20161123 $i 1469-8161 $m Parasitology $n Parasitology $x MED00010377
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20171025

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...