• Something wrong with this record ?

The role of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in choledochal cysts and/or abnormal pancreatobiliary junction in children

J. Drabek, R. Keil, J. Stovicek, J. Lochmannova, S. Hlava, J. Snajdauf, M. Rygl, J. Nevoral,

. 2017 ; 12 (4) : 303-309. [pub] 20171214

Language English Country Poland

Document type Journal Article

Introduction: Biliary cysts with an abnormal pancreatobiliary junction are one of the most common pancreatobiliary malformations. The main symptom is cholestasis; endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) plays a key role in diagnosis. Aim: Retrospective evaluation of ERCP performed to diagnose abnormalities of the pancreatobiliary junction. Material and methods: We retrospectively evaluated ERCP performed to diagnose abnormalities of the pancreatobiliary junction, mainly choledochal cysts, in 112 children between 1990 and 2011. Results: We performed 112 examinations of 50 children with abnormal pancreatobiliary junction and choledochal cysts (15 males and 35 females, average age: 5 years, range: 1 month - 15 years). Cysts were associated with a common channel in 37 (74%) cases, were not associated with a common channel in 9 (18%) cases, and in 3 (6%) cases the common channel lacked cysts. We performed endoscopic papilla sphincterotomy on 33 (66%) patients; endoscopic drainage was performed 62 times, including 17 patients without papilla sphincterotomy. In 15 (30%) cases, we only performed sphincterotomy. Extraction of lithiasis was done in 2 (4%) cases. Both ERCP and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) were performed on 13 patients. There was concordance of the choledochal cyst and of the type of cyst in both methods; however, common channels could not be observed by MRCP. There was 1 serious complication (perforation after sphincterotomy) and 11 (9%) mild adverse events. Conclusions: When performed at an expert centre, ECRP is a safe and reliable procedure for children with choledochal cysts and/or an abnormal pancreatobiliary junction. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography remains a reasonable alternative because MRCP has a limited ability to diagnose the precise anomalies of the pancreatobiliary junction and has no therapeutic capabilities.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc18010064
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20231121144933.0
007      
ta
008      
180404s2017 pl f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.5114/pg.2017.72107 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)29359001
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a pl
100    1_
$a Drabek, Jiri $u Clinic of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Motol, Prague, Czech Republic.
245    14
$a The role of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in choledochal cysts and/or abnormal pancreatobiliary junction in children / $c J. Drabek, R. Keil, J. Stovicek, J. Lochmannova, S. Hlava, J. Snajdauf, M. Rygl, J. Nevoral,
520    9_
$a Introduction: Biliary cysts with an abnormal pancreatobiliary junction are one of the most common pancreatobiliary malformations. The main symptom is cholestasis; endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) plays a key role in diagnosis. Aim: Retrospective evaluation of ERCP performed to diagnose abnormalities of the pancreatobiliary junction. Material and methods: We retrospectively evaluated ERCP performed to diagnose abnormalities of the pancreatobiliary junction, mainly choledochal cysts, in 112 children between 1990 and 2011. Results: We performed 112 examinations of 50 children with abnormal pancreatobiliary junction and choledochal cysts (15 males and 35 females, average age: 5 years, range: 1 month - 15 years). Cysts were associated with a common channel in 37 (74%) cases, were not associated with a common channel in 9 (18%) cases, and in 3 (6%) cases the common channel lacked cysts. We performed endoscopic papilla sphincterotomy on 33 (66%) patients; endoscopic drainage was performed 62 times, including 17 patients without papilla sphincterotomy. In 15 (30%) cases, we only performed sphincterotomy. Extraction of lithiasis was done in 2 (4%) cases. Both ERCP and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) were performed on 13 patients. There was concordance of the choledochal cyst and of the type of cyst in both methods; however, common channels could not be observed by MRCP. There was 1 serious complication (perforation after sphincterotomy) and 11 (9%) mild adverse events. Conclusions: When performed at an expert centre, ECRP is a safe and reliable procedure for children with choledochal cysts and/or an abnormal pancreatobiliary junction. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography remains a reasonable alternative because MRCP has a limited ability to diagnose the precise anomalies of the pancreatobiliary junction and has no therapeutic capabilities.
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Keil, Radan $u Clinic of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Motol, Prague, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Stovicek, Jan $u Clinic of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Motol, Prague, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Lochmannová, Jindra, $u Clinic of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Motol, Prague, Czech Republic. $d 1968- $7 xx0063944
700    1_
$a Hlava, Stepan $u Clinic of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Motol, Prague, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Snajdauf, Jiri $u Clinic of Paediatric Surgery, University Hospital Motol, Prague, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Rygl, Michal $u Clinic of Paediatric Surgery, University Hospital Motol, Prague, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Nevoral, Jiri $u Clinic of Paediatry, University Hospital Motol, Prague, Czech Republic.
773    0_
$w MED00189568 $t Przegla̜d gastroenterologiczny $x 1895-5770 $g Roč. 12, č. 4 (2017), s. 303-309
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29359001 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20180404 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20231121144930 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ind $b bmc $g 1287549 $s 1006876
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2017 $b 12 $c 4 $d 303-309 $e 20171214 $i 1895-5770 $m Przegla̜d gastroenterologiczny $n Prz Gastroenterol $x MED00189568
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20180404

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...