-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Increased Incretin But Not Insulin Response after Oral versus Intravenous Branched Chain Amino Acids
J. Gojda, R. Straková, A. Plíhalová, P. Tůma, J. Potočková, J. Polák, M. Anděl,
Jazyk angličtina Země Švýcarsko
Typ dokumentu srovnávací studie, časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
PubMed
28595189
DOI
10.1159/000475604
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- aplikace orální MeSH
- C-peptid krev MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- glukagon krev MeSH
- glukagonu podobný peptid 1 krev MeSH
- inkretiny krev MeSH
- intravenózní podání MeSH
- inzulin krev MeSH
- isoleucin krev MeSH
- krevní glukóza metabolismus MeSH
- leucin krev MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mladý dospělý MeSH
- valin krev MeSH
- větvené aminokyseliny aplikace a dávkování krev MeSH
- vztah mezi dávkou a účinkem léčiva MeSH
- žaludeční inhibiční polypeptid krev MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mladý dospělý MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- srovnávací studie MeSH
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Branched chain amino acids (BCAAs) are known to exert an insulinotropic effect. Whether this effect is mediated by incretins (glucagon like peptide 1 [GLP-1] or glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide [GIP]) is not known. The aim of this study was to show whether an equivalent dose of BCAA elicits a greater insulin and incretin response when administered orally than intravenously (IV). METHODS: Eighteen healthy, male subjects participated in 3 tests: IV application of BCAA solution, oral ingestion of BCAA and placebo in an equivalent dose (30.7 ± 1.1 g). Glucose, insulin, C-peptide, glucagon, GLP-1, GIP, valine, leucine and isoleucine concentrations were measured. RESULTS: Rise in serum BCAA was achieved in both BCAA tests, with incremental areas under the curve (iAUC) being 2.1 times greater for IV BCAA compared with those of the oral BCAA test (p < 0.0001). Oral and IV BCAA induced comparable insulin response greater than placebo (240 min insulin iAUC: oral 3,411 ± 577 vs. IV 2,361 ± 384 vs. placebo 961.2 ± 175 pmol/L, p = 0.0006). Oral BCAA induced higher GLP-1 (p < 0.0001) and GIP response (p < 0.0001) compared with the IV or placebo. Glucose levels declined significantly (p < 0.001) in the same pattern during both BCAA tests with no change in the placebo group. CONCLUSIONS: An equivalent dose of BCAA elicited a comparable insulin and greater incretin response when administered orally and not when administered through IV. We conclude that insulinotropic effects of BCAA are partially incretin dependent.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc18024959
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20180711101017.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 180709s2017 sz f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1159/000475604 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)28595189
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a sz
- 100 1_
- $a Gojda, Jan $u Centre for Research on Diabetes, Metabolism and Nutrition of Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
- 245 10
- $a Increased Incretin But Not Insulin Response after Oral versus Intravenous Branched Chain Amino Acids / $c J. Gojda, R. Straková, A. Plíhalová, P. Tůma, J. Potočková, J. Polák, M. Anděl,
- 520 9_
- $a BACKGROUND/AIMS: Branched chain amino acids (BCAAs) are known to exert an insulinotropic effect. Whether this effect is mediated by incretins (glucagon like peptide 1 [GLP-1] or glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide [GIP]) is not known. The aim of this study was to show whether an equivalent dose of BCAA elicits a greater insulin and incretin response when administered orally than intravenously (IV). METHODS: Eighteen healthy, male subjects participated in 3 tests: IV application of BCAA solution, oral ingestion of BCAA and placebo in an equivalent dose (30.7 ± 1.1 g). Glucose, insulin, C-peptide, glucagon, GLP-1, GIP, valine, leucine and isoleucine concentrations were measured. RESULTS: Rise in serum BCAA was achieved in both BCAA tests, with incremental areas under the curve (iAUC) being 2.1 times greater for IV BCAA compared with those of the oral BCAA test (p < 0.0001). Oral and IV BCAA induced comparable insulin response greater than placebo (240 min insulin iAUC: oral 3,411 ± 577 vs. IV 2,361 ± 384 vs. placebo 961.2 ± 175 pmol/L, p = 0.0006). Oral BCAA induced higher GLP-1 (p < 0.0001) and GIP response (p < 0.0001) compared with the IV or placebo. Glucose levels declined significantly (p < 0.001) in the same pattern during both BCAA tests with no change in the placebo group. CONCLUSIONS: An equivalent dose of BCAA elicited a comparable insulin and greater incretin response when administered orally and not when administered through IV. We conclude that insulinotropic effects of BCAA are partially incretin dependent.
- 650 _2
- $a intravenózní podání $7 D061605
- 650 _2
- $a aplikace orální $7 D000284
- 650 _2
- $a dospělí $7 D000328
- 650 _2
- $a větvené aminokyseliny $x aplikace a dávkování $x krev $7 D000597
- 650 _2
- $a krevní glukóza $x metabolismus $7 D001786
- 650 _2
- $a C-peptid $x krev $7 D002096
- 650 _2
- $a vztah mezi dávkou a účinkem léčiva $7 D004305
- 650 _2
- $a žaludeční inhibiční polypeptid $x krev $7 D005749
- 650 _2
- $a glukagon $x krev $7 D005934
- 650 _2
- $a glukagonu podobný peptid 1 $x krev $7 D052216
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a inkretiny $x krev $7 D054795
- 650 _2
- $a inzulin $x krev $7 D007328
- 650 _2
- $a isoleucin $x krev $7 D007532
- 650 _2
- $a leucin $x krev $7 D007930
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a valin $x krev $7 D014633
- 650 _2
- $a mladý dospělý $7 D055815
- 655 _2
- $a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Straková, Radka
- 700 1_
- $a Plíhalová, Andrea
- 700 1_
- $a Tůma, Petr
- 700 1_
- $a Potočková, Jana
- 700 1_
- $a Polák, Jan
- 700 1_
- $a Anděl, Michal
- 773 0_
- $w MED00000430 $t Annals of nutrition & metabolism $x 1421-9697 $g Roč. 70, č. 4 (2017), s. 293-302
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28595189 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20180709 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20180711101309 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1317090 $s 1021880
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2017 $b 70 $c 4 $d 293-302 $e 20170609 $i 1421-9697 $m Annals of nutrition & metabolism $n Ann Nutr Metab $x MED00000430
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20180709