• Something wrong with this record ?

Anthelmintic resistance in goat herds-In vivo versus in vitro detection methods

M. Babják, A. Königová, M. Urda Dolinská, J. Vadlejch, M. Várady,

. 2018 ; 254 (-) : 10-14. [pub] 20180225

Language English Country Netherlands

Document type Journal Article

Anthelmintic resistance (AR) is a serious threat to animal health and has a major economic impact worldwide due to production and financial losses. The aim of this study was to determine the occurrence of AR on 30 goat farms in Slovakia during the pasturing seasons and to compare three widely used in vitro and in vivo methods for detecting AR in field conditions. A three-year survey was conducted during the pasturing seasons of 2014-2016. Goats on each farm were split into treated and control groups and were treated by recommended (5 mg/kg body weight) and double doses (10 mg/kg b.w.) of albendazole. Comparisons between percent reduction in a faecal egg count reduction test (FECRT) and an egg hatch test (EHT) and the presence of L3 larvae in a larval development test (LDT) using resistant concentrations of benzimidazole (BZ) were monitored after treatment. The FECRT indicated percent reductions of 69.2-86.2% for the single dose and of 36.3-45.4% for the double dose. The EHT indicated that all farms had BZ-resistant nematodes. Low (<15% hatching) and high (>15% hatching) levels of resistance were detected on 13 and 17 farms, respectively. The LDT failed to detect resistant larvae on seven farms but detected low and high levels of resistance on seven and 14 farms, respectively. The data indicate a moderate correlation between in vitro and in vivo tests for detecting BZ resistance among the 30 goat farms. The hatching detected by the EHT and the presence of L3 larvae by the LDT at resistant BZ concentrations provided reasonable identification of low levels of resistance in the parasite populations, but the use of a double dose for a treatment may underestimate the real occurrence of low levels of resistant parasites on goat farms.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc18033156
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20181012093601.0
007      
ta
008      
181008s2018 ne f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1016/j.vetpar.2018.02.036 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)29656993
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a ne
100    1_
$a Babják, M $u Institute of Parasitology, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Hlinkova 3, 040 01, Košice, Slovak Republic. Electronic address: babjak@saske.sk.
245    10
$a Anthelmintic resistance in goat herds-In vivo versus in vitro detection methods / $c M. Babják, A. Königová, M. Urda Dolinská, J. Vadlejch, M. Várady,
520    9_
$a Anthelmintic resistance (AR) is a serious threat to animal health and has a major economic impact worldwide due to production and financial losses. The aim of this study was to determine the occurrence of AR on 30 goat farms in Slovakia during the pasturing seasons and to compare three widely used in vitro and in vivo methods for detecting AR in field conditions. A three-year survey was conducted during the pasturing seasons of 2014-2016. Goats on each farm were split into treated and control groups and were treated by recommended (5 mg/kg body weight) and double doses (10 mg/kg b.w.) of albendazole. Comparisons between percent reduction in a faecal egg count reduction test (FECRT) and an egg hatch test (EHT) and the presence of L3 larvae in a larval development test (LDT) using resistant concentrations of benzimidazole (BZ) were monitored after treatment. The FECRT indicated percent reductions of 69.2-86.2% for the single dose and of 36.3-45.4% for the double dose. The EHT indicated that all farms had BZ-resistant nematodes. Low (<15% hatching) and high (>15% hatching) levels of resistance were detected on 13 and 17 farms, respectively. The LDT failed to detect resistant larvae on seven farms but detected low and high levels of resistance on seven and 14 farms, respectively. The data indicate a moderate correlation between in vitro and in vivo tests for detecting BZ resistance among the 30 goat farms. The hatching detected by the EHT and the presence of L3 larvae by the LDT at resistant BZ concentrations provided reasonable identification of low levels of resistance in the parasite populations, but the use of a double dose for a treatment may underestimate the real occurrence of low levels of resistant parasites on goat farms.
650    _2
$a zvířata $7 D000818
650    _2
$a anthelmintika $x farmakologie $7 D000871
650    _2
$a benzimidazoly $x farmakologie $7 D001562
650    _2
$a vztah mezi dávkou a účinkem léčiva $7 D004305
650    12
$a léková rezistence $7 D004351
650    _2
$a kozy $x parazitologie $7 D006041
650    _2
$a Haemonchus $x anatomie a histologie $x účinky léků $x růst a vývoj $7 D006189
650    _2
$a techniky in vitro $7 D066298
650    _2
$a larva $x anatomie a histologie $x účinky léků $x růst a vývoj $7 D007814
650    _2
$a Ostertagia $x anatomie a histologie $x účinky léků $x růst a vývoj $7 D010028
650    _2
$a Slovenská republika $7 D018154
650    _2
$a Trichostrongylus $x anatomie a histologie $x účinky léků $x růst a vývoj $7 D014254
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Königová, A $u Institute of Parasitology, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Hlinkova 3, 040 01, Košice, Slovak Republic. Electronic address: konig@saske.sk.
700    1_
$a Urda Dolinská, M $u Institute of Parasitology, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Hlinkova 3, 040 01, Košice, Slovak Republic. Electronic address: dolinska@saske.sk.
700    1_
$a Vadlejch, J $u Department of Zoology and Fisheries, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamýcká 957, 165 21 Prague 6-Suchdol, Czech Republic. Electronic address: vadlejch@af.czu.cz.
700    1_
$a Várady, M $u Institute of Parasitology, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Hlinkova 3, 040 01, Košice, Slovak Republic. Electronic address: varady@saske.sk.
773    0_
$w MED00006161 $t Veterinary parasitology $x 1873-2550 $g Roč. 254, č. - (2018), s. 10-14
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29656993 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20181008 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20181012094053 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1339383 $s 1030150
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2018 $b 254 $c - $d 10-14 $e 20180225 $i 1873-2550 $m Veterinary parasitology $n Vet Parasitol $x MED00006161
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20181008

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...