• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Introducing a soil universal model method (SUMM) and its application for qualitative and quantitative determination of poly(ethylene), poly(styrene), poly(vinyl chloride) and poly(ethylene terephthalate) microplastics in a model soil

J. David, HD. Weissmannová, Z. Steinmetz, L. Kabelíková, MS. Demyan, J. Šimečková, D. Tokarski, C. Siewert, GE. Schaumann, J. Kučerík,

. 2019 ; 225 (-) : 810-819. [pub] 20190314

Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc19027690

Methods for analysis of microplastic in soils are still being developed. In this study, we evaluated the potential of a soil universal model method (SUMM) based on thermogravimetry (TGA) for the identification and quantification of microplastics in standard loamy sand. Blank and spiked soils (with amounts of one of four microplastic types) were analyzed by TGA. For each sample, thermal mass losses (TML) in 10 °C intervals were extracted and used for further analysis. To explain and demonstrate the principles of SUMM, two scenarios were discussed. The first refers to a rare situation in which an uncontaminated blank of investigated soil is available and TML of spiked and blank soils are subtracted. The results showed that the investigated microplastics degraded in characteristic temperature areas and differences between spiked and blank soils were proportional to the microplastics concentrations. The second scenario reflects the more common situation where the blank is not available and needs to be replaced by the previously developed interrelationships representing soil universal models. The models were consequently subtracted from measured TML. Sparse principal component analysis (sPCA) identified 8 of 14 modeled differences between measured TMLs and the universal model as meaningful for microplastics discrimination. Calibrating various microplastics concentrations with the first principal component extracted from sPCA resulted in linear fits and limits of detection in between environmentally relevant microplastics concentrations. Even if such an approach using calculated standards still has limitations, the SUMM shows a certain potential for a fast pre-screening method for analysis of microplastics in soils.

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc19027690
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20190815105358.0
007      
ta
008      
190813s2019 enk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.03.078 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)30904761
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a enk
100    1_
$a David, Jan $u Group of Environmental and Soil Chemistry, Institute for Environmental Sciences, University of Koblenz-Landau, Fortstraße 7, 76829 Landau in der Pfalz, Germany.
245    10
$a Introducing a soil universal model method (SUMM) and its application for qualitative and quantitative determination of poly(ethylene), poly(styrene), poly(vinyl chloride) and poly(ethylene terephthalate) microplastics in a model soil / $c J. David, HD. Weissmannová, Z. Steinmetz, L. Kabelíková, MS. Demyan, J. Šimečková, D. Tokarski, C. Siewert, GE. Schaumann, J. Kučerík,
520    9_
$a Methods for analysis of microplastic in soils are still being developed. In this study, we evaluated the potential of a soil universal model method (SUMM) based on thermogravimetry (TGA) for the identification and quantification of microplastics in standard loamy sand. Blank and spiked soils (with amounts of one of four microplastic types) were analyzed by TGA. For each sample, thermal mass losses (TML) in 10 °C intervals were extracted and used for further analysis. To explain and demonstrate the principles of SUMM, two scenarios were discussed. The first refers to a rare situation in which an uncontaminated blank of investigated soil is available and TML of spiked and blank soils are subtracted. The results showed that the investigated microplastics degraded in characteristic temperature areas and differences between spiked and blank soils were proportional to the microplastics concentrations. The second scenario reflects the more common situation where the blank is not available and needs to be replaced by the previously developed interrelationships representing soil universal models. The models were consequently subtracted from measured TML. Sparse principal component analysis (sPCA) identified 8 of 14 modeled differences between measured TMLs and the universal model as meaningful for microplastics discrimination. Calibrating various microplastics concentrations with the first principal component extracted from sPCA resulted in linear fits and limits of detection in between environmentally relevant microplastics concentrations. Even if such an approach using calculated standards still has limitations, the SUMM shows a certain potential for a fast pre-screening method for analysis of microplastics in soils.
650    12
$a chemické modely $7 D008956
650    _2
$a plastické hmoty $x analýza $x chemie $7 D010969
650    _2
$a polyethylen $x analýza $7 D020959
650    _2
$a polyethylentereftaláty $x analýza $7 D011093
650    _2
$a polystyreny $x analýza $7 D011137
650    _2
$a polyvinylchlorid $x analýza $7 D011143
650    _2
$a analýza hlavních komponent $7 D025341
650    _2
$a půda $x chemie $7 D012987
650    _2
$a látky znečišťující půdu $x analýza $7 D012989
650    _2
$a teplota $7 D013696
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Weissmannová, Helena Doležalová $u Institute of Chemistry and Technology of Environmental Protection, Faculty of Chemistry, Brno University of Technology, Purkyňova 118, 612 00 Brno, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Steinmetz, Zacharias $u Group of Environmental and Soil Chemistry, Institute for Environmental Sciences, University of Koblenz-Landau, Fortstraße 7, 76829 Landau in der Pfalz, Germany.
700    1_
$a Kabelíková, Lucie $u Institute of Chemistry and Technology of Environmental Protection, Faculty of Chemistry, Brno University of Technology, Purkyňova 118, 612 00 Brno, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Demyan, Michael Scott $u School of Environment and Natural Resources, Ohio State University, 2021 Coffey Rd., Columbus, OH 43210, USA.
700    1_
$a Šimečková, Jana $u Department of Agrochemistry, Soil Science, Microbiology and Plant Nutrition, Faculty of AgriScience, Mendel University in Brno, Zemědělská 1, 613 00 Brno, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Tokarski, David $u LKS - Landwirtschaftliche Kommunikations- und Servicegesellschaft mbH, August-Bebel Str. 6, 09577 Niederwiesa, Germany; Dresden University of Technology, Institute of Soil Science and Site Ecology, Pienner Str. 19, 01737 Tharandt, Germany.
700    1_
$a Siewert, Christian $u Technical University Berlin, Institute of Ecology, Chair of Soil Conservation, Ernst-Reuter Platz 1, 10587 Berlin, Germany.
700    1_
$a Schaumann, Gabriele E $u Group of Environmental and Soil Chemistry, Institute for Environmental Sciences, University of Koblenz-Landau, Fortstraße 7, 76829 Landau in der Pfalz, Germany.
700    1_
$a Kučerík, Jiří $u Institute of Chemistry and Technology of Environmental Protection, Faculty of Chemistry, Brno University of Technology, Purkyňova 118, 612 00 Brno, Czech Republic. Electronic address: kucerik@fch.vut.cz.
773    0_
$w MED00002124 $t Chemosphere $x 1879-1298 $g Roč. 225, č. - (2019), s. 810-819
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30904761 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20190813 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20190815105626 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1432839 $s 1066150
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2019 $b 225 $c - $d 810-819 $e 20190314 $i 1879-1298 $m Chemosphere $n Chemosphere $x MED00002124
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20190813

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat...