-
Something wrong with this record ?
Age-Related Differences With Immersive and Non-immersive Virtual Reality in Memory Assessment
A. Plechatá, V. Sahula, D. Fayette, I. Fajnerová,
Language English Country Switzerland
Document type Journal Article
NLK
Directory of Open Access Journals
from 2010
Free Medical Journals
from 2010
PubMed Central
from 2010
Europe PubMed Central
from 2010
Open Access Digital Library
from 2010-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
from 2010-01-01
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
from 2010
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
Memory decline associated with physiological aging and age-related neurological disorders has a direct impact on quality of life for seniors. With demographic aging, the assessment of cognitive functions is gaining importance, as early diagnosis can lead to more effective cognitive interventions. In comparison to classic paper-and-pencil approaches, virtual reality (VR) could offer an ecologically valid environment for assessment and remediation of cognitive deficits. Despite the rapid development and application of new technologies, the results of studies aimed at the role of VR immersion in assessing cognitive performance and the use of VR in aging populations are often ambiguous. VR can be presented in a less immersive form, with a desktop platform, or with more advanced technologies like head-mounted displays (HMDs). Both these VR platforms are associated with certain advantages and disadvantages. In this study, we investigated age-related differences related to the use of desktop and HMD platforms during memory assessment using an intra-subject design. Groups of seniors (N = 36) and young adults (N = 25) completed a virtual Supermarket Shopping task using desktop and HMD platforms in a counterbalanced order. Our results show that the senior performances were superior when using the non-immersive desktop platform. The ability to recall a shopping list in the young adult group remained stable regardless of the platform used. With the HMD platform, the performance of the subjects of both groups seemed to be more influenced by fatigue. The evaluated user experiences did not differ between the two platforms, and only minimal and rare side effects were reported by seniors. This implies that highly immersive technology has good acceptance among aging adults. These findings might have implications for the further use of HMD in cognitive assessment and remediation.
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc19028834
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20240807135916.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 190813e20190611sz f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01330 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)31244729
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a sz
- 100 1_
- $a Plechatá, Adéla $u National Institute of Mental Health, Klecany, Czechia. Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czechia.
- 245 10
- $a Age-Related Differences With Immersive and Non-immersive Virtual Reality in Memory Assessment / $c A. Plechatá, V. Sahula, D. Fayette, I. Fajnerová,
- 520 9_
- $a Memory decline associated with physiological aging and age-related neurological disorders has a direct impact on quality of life for seniors. With demographic aging, the assessment of cognitive functions is gaining importance, as early diagnosis can lead to more effective cognitive interventions. In comparison to classic paper-and-pencil approaches, virtual reality (VR) could offer an ecologically valid environment for assessment and remediation of cognitive deficits. Despite the rapid development and application of new technologies, the results of studies aimed at the role of VR immersion in assessing cognitive performance and the use of VR in aging populations are often ambiguous. VR can be presented in a less immersive form, with a desktop platform, or with more advanced technologies like head-mounted displays (HMDs). Both these VR platforms are associated with certain advantages and disadvantages. In this study, we investigated age-related differences related to the use of desktop and HMD platforms during memory assessment using an intra-subject design. Groups of seniors (N = 36) and young adults (N = 25) completed a virtual Supermarket Shopping task using desktop and HMD platforms in a counterbalanced order. Our results show that the senior performances were superior when using the non-immersive desktop platform. The ability to recall a shopping list in the young adult group remained stable regardless of the platform used. With the HMD platform, the performance of the subjects of both groups seemed to be more influenced by fatigue. The evaluated user experiences did not differ between the two platforms, and only minimal and rare side effects were reported by seniors. This implies that highly immersive technology has good acceptance among aging adults. These findings might have implications for the further use of HMD in cognitive assessment and remediation.
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Sahula, Václav $u National Institute of Mental Health, Klecany, Czechia.
- 700 1_
- $a Fayette, Dan, $u National Institute of Mental Health, Klecany, Czechia. Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czechia. $d 1981- $7 xx0321144
- 700 1_
- $a Fajnerová, Iveta $u National Institute of Mental Health, Klecany, Czechia.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00174603 $t Frontiers in psychology $x 1664-1078 $g Roč. 10 (20190611), s. 1330
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31244729 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20190813 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20240807135911 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ind $b bmc $g 1433983 $s 1067294
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2019 $b 10 $c - $d 1330 $e 20190611 $i 1664-1078 $m Frontiers in psychology $n Front Psychol $x MED00174603
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20190813