-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Evolution of female promiscuity in Passerides songbirds
JT. Lifjeld, J. Gohli, T. Albrecht, E. Garcia-Del-Rey, LE. Johannessen, O. Kleven, PZ. Marki, TC. Omotoriogun, M. Rowe, A. Johnsen,
Jazyk angličtina Země Velká Británie
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
Directory of Open Access Journals od 2001
Free Medical Journals od 2001
PubMed Central od 2001 do 2020
Europe PubMed Central od 2001
ProQuest Central od 2009-01-01 do 2020-01-31
Open Access Digital Library od 2001-01-01
Open Access Digital Library od 2001-01-01
Open Access Digital Library od 2001-02-01
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost) od 2001-01-01 do 2020-12-29
Health & Medicine (ProQuest) od 2009-01-01 do 2020-01-31
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources od 2001 do 2021
Odkazy
PubMed
31412767
DOI
10.1186/s12862-019-1493-1
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- biologická evoluce * MeSH
- chov MeSH
- ekologie MeSH
- fylogeneze MeSH
- párová vazba MeSH
- sexuální chování zvířat * MeSH
- velikost těla MeSH
- zpěvní ptáci genetika fyziologie MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Check Tag
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
BACKGROUND: Female promiscuity is highly variable among birds, and particularly among songbirds. Comparative work has identified several patterns of covariation with social, sexual, ecological and life history traits. However, it is unclear whether these patterns reflect causes or consequences of female promiscuity, or if they are byproducts of some unknown evolutionary drivers. Moreover, factors that explain promiscuity at the deep nodes in the phylogenetic tree may be different from those important at the tips, i.e. among closely related species. Here we examine the relationships between female promiscuity and a broad set of predictor variables in a comprehensive data set (N = 202 species) of Passerides songbirds, which is a highly diversified infraorder of the Passeriformes exhibiting significant variation in female promiscuity. RESULTS: Female promiscuity was highly variable in all major clades of the Passerides phylogeny and also among closely related species. We found several significant associations with female promiscuity, albeit with fairly small effect sizes (all R2 ≤ 0.08). More promiscuous species had: 1) less male parental care, particularly during the early stages of the nesting cycle (nest building and incubation), 2) more short-term pair bonds, 3) greater degree of sexual dichromatism, primarily because females were drabber, 4) more migratory behaviour, and 5) stronger pre-mating sexual selection. In a multivariate model, however, the effect of sexual selection disappeared, while the other four variables showed additive effects and together explained about 16% of the total variance in female promiscuity. Female promiscuity showed no relationship with body size, life history variation, latitude or cooperative breeding. CONCLUSIONS: We found that multiple traits were associated with female promiscuity, but these associations were generally weak. Some traits, such as reduced parental care in males and more cryptic plumage in females, might even be responses to, rather than causes of, variation in female promiscuity. Hence, the high variation in female promiscuity among Passerides species remains enigmatic. Female promiscuity seems to be a rapidly evolving trait that often diverges between species with similar ecologies and breeding systems. A future challenge is therefore to understand what drives within-lineage variation in female promiscuity over microevolutionary time scales.
Natural History Museum University of Oslo P O Box 1172 Blindern NO 0318 Oslo Norway
Norwegian Institute for Nature Research P O Box 5685 Torgarden NO 7485 Trondheim Norway
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc19044581
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20200113101326.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 200109s2019 xxk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1186/s12862-019-1493-1 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)31412767
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxk
- 100 1_
- $a Lifjeld, Jan T $u Natural History Museum, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1172, Blindern, NO-0318, Oslo, Norway. j.t.lifjeld@nhm.uio.no.
- 245 10
- $a Evolution of female promiscuity in Passerides songbirds / $c JT. Lifjeld, J. Gohli, T. Albrecht, E. Garcia-Del-Rey, LE. Johannessen, O. Kleven, PZ. Marki, TC. Omotoriogun, M. Rowe, A. Johnsen,
- 520 9_
- $a BACKGROUND: Female promiscuity is highly variable among birds, and particularly among songbirds. Comparative work has identified several patterns of covariation with social, sexual, ecological and life history traits. However, it is unclear whether these patterns reflect causes or consequences of female promiscuity, or if they are byproducts of some unknown evolutionary drivers. Moreover, factors that explain promiscuity at the deep nodes in the phylogenetic tree may be different from those important at the tips, i.e. among closely related species. Here we examine the relationships between female promiscuity and a broad set of predictor variables in a comprehensive data set (N = 202 species) of Passerides songbirds, which is a highly diversified infraorder of the Passeriformes exhibiting significant variation in female promiscuity. RESULTS: Female promiscuity was highly variable in all major clades of the Passerides phylogeny and also among closely related species. We found several significant associations with female promiscuity, albeit with fairly small effect sizes (all R2 ≤ 0.08). More promiscuous species had: 1) less male parental care, particularly during the early stages of the nesting cycle (nest building and incubation), 2) more short-term pair bonds, 3) greater degree of sexual dichromatism, primarily because females were drabber, 4) more migratory behaviour, and 5) stronger pre-mating sexual selection. In a multivariate model, however, the effect of sexual selection disappeared, while the other four variables showed additive effects and together explained about 16% of the total variance in female promiscuity. Female promiscuity showed no relationship with body size, life history variation, latitude or cooperative breeding. CONCLUSIONS: We found that multiple traits were associated with female promiscuity, but these associations were generally weak. Some traits, such as reduced parental care in males and more cryptic plumage in females, might even be responses to, rather than causes of, variation in female promiscuity. Hence, the high variation in female promiscuity among Passerides species remains enigmatic. Female promiscuity seems to be a rapidly evolving trait that often diverges between species with similar ecologies and breeding systems. A future challenge is therefore to understand what drives within-lineage variation in female promiscuity over microevolutionary time scales.
- 650 _2
- $a zvířata $7 D000818
- 650 12
- $a biologická evoluce $7 D005075
- 650 _2
- $a velikost těla $7 D049628
- 650 _2
- $a chov $7 D001947
- 650 _2
- $a ekologie $7 D004463
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a párová vazba $7 D010152
- 650 _2
- $a fylogeneze $7 D010802
- 650 12
- $a sexuální chování zvířat $7 D012726
- 650 _2
- $a zpěvní ptáci $x genetika $x fyziologie $7 D020308
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Gohli, Jostein $u Natural History Museum, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1172, Blindern, NO-0318, Oslo, Norway.
- 700 1_
- $a Albrecht, Tomáš $u Institute of Vertebrate Biology, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, v.v.i., Květná 8, CZ-67502, Brno, Czech Republic. Department of Zoology, Charles University in Prague, Viničná 7, CZ-12844, Prague, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Garcia-Del-Rey, Eduardo $u Macaronesian Institute of Field Ornithology, C/ Elias Ramos Gonzalez 5, 3-H, 38001, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Canary Islands, Spain.
- 700 1_
- $a Johannessen, Lars Erik $u Natural History Museum, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1172, Blindern, NO-0318, Oslo, Norway.
- 700 1_
- $a Kleven, Oddmund $u Norwegian Institute for Nature Research, P.O. Box 5685, Torgarden, NO-7485, Trondheim, Norway.
- 700 1_
- $a Marki, Petter Z $u Natural History Museum, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1172, Blindern, NO-0318, Oslo, Norway. Center for Macroecology, Evolution and Climate, Natural History Museum of Denmark, University of Copenhagen, Universitetsparken 15, DK-2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.
- 700 1_
- $a Omotoriogun, Taiwo C $u Natural History Museum, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1172, Blindern, NO-0318, Oslo, Norway. A.P. Leventis Ornithological Research Institute, University of Jos, Jos, Nigeria. Biotechnology Unit, Department of Biological Sciences, Elizade University, P.M.B. 002, Ilara-Mokin, Ondo State, Nigeria.
- 700 1_
- $a Rowe, Melissah $u Natural History Museum, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1172, Blindern, NO-0318, Oslo, Norway. Centre for Ecological and Evolutionary Synthesis, Department of Biosciences, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1066, Blindern, NO-0316, Oslo, Norway.
- 700 1_
- $a Johnsen, Arild $u Natural History Museum, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1172, Blindern, NO-0318, Oslo, Norway.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00006797 $t BMC evolutionary biology $x 1471-2148 $g Roč. 19, č. 1 (2019), s. 169
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31412767 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20200109 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20200113101658 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1482850 $s 1083254
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2019 $b 19 $c 1 $d 169 $e 20190814 $i 1471-2148 $m BMC evolutionary biology $n BMC Evol Biol $x MED00006797
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20200109