-
Something wrong with this record ?
Impacts of different anesthetic agents on left ventricular systolic function in mice assessed by echocardiography
C. Li, J. Dai, F. Wu, H. Zhang
Language English Country Czech Republic
Document type Journal Article
NLK
Directory of Open Access Journals
from 1991
Free Medical Journals
from 1998
ProQuest Central
from 2005-01-01
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost)
from 2006-01-01
Nursing & Allied Health Database (ProQuest)
from 2005-01-01
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
from 2005-01-01
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
from 1998
- MeSH
- Anesthetics toxicity MeSH
- Ventricular Dysfunction, Left chemically induced diagnostic imaging physiopathology MeSH
- Echocardiography drug effects methods MeSH
- Ventricular Function, Left drug effects physiology MeSH
- Mice, Inbred C57BL MeSH
- Mice MeSH
- Random Allocation MeSH
- Heart Rate drug effects physiology MeSH
- Systole drug effects physiology MeSH
- Stroke Volume drug effects physiology MeSH
- Animals MeSH
- Check Tag
- Male MeSH
- Mice MeSH
- Animals MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
The present experiments were performed to study the effects and time trends of different anesthetic agents on the left ventricular (LV) systolic function and heart rate by high-resolution echocardiography in mice. Ten male C57BL/6J mice were submitted to echocardiography imaging separated by 72-hour intervals under the following conditions: 1) conscious mice, 2) mice anesthetized with isoflurane (ISO, inhaled), 3) mice anesthetized with tribromoethanol (TBE, intraperitoneal), 4) mice anesthetized with chloral hydrate (CH, intraperitoneal), and 5) mice anesthetized with pentobarbital sodium (PS, intraperitoneal). The effect of ISO, TBE, CH, and PS on LV systolic function was measured at 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, and 10 min after anesthesia. The results showed that LV systolic function and heart rate (HR) of anesthetized mice were reduced significantly (P<0.05), compared with results in the same mice studied in the conscious state. In addition, the results indicated that the anesthetic with the least effect on LV function was CH, and followed by TBE, PS, ISO. We conclude that different anesthetic agents always depressed the HR and LV systolic function of mice, and, furthermore, the effects and time trends of different anesthetics on LV function are different. In echocardiographic experiments, we should choose proper anesthetic agents according to the experimental requirements.
Department of Clinical Diagnostics Hebei Medical University Shijiazhuang Hebei China
School of Basic Medical Sciences Hebei Medical University Shijiazhuang Hebei China
References provided by Crossref.org
Literatura
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc19046493
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20200122093305.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 200107s2019 xr d f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.33549/physiolres.933940 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)30904003
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xr
- 100 1_
- $a Li, C. $u Department of Physiology, Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China and School of Basic Medical Sciences, Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China
- 245 10
- $a Impacts of different anesthetic agents on left ventricular systolic function in mice assessed by echocardiography / $c C. Li, J. Dai, F. Wu, H. Zhang
- 504 __
- $a Literatura
- 520 9_
- $a The present experiments were performed to study the effects and time trends of different anesthetic agents on the left ventricular (LV) systolic function and heart rate by high-resolution echocardiography in mice. Ten male C57BL/6J mice were submitted to echocardiography imaging separated by 72-hour intervals under the following conditions: 1) conscious mice, 2) mice anesthetized with isoflurane (ISO, inhaled), 3) mice anesthetized with tribromoethanol (TBE, intraperitoneal), 4) mice anesthetized with chloral hydrate (CH, intraperitoneal), and 5) mice anesthetized with pentobarbital sodium (PS, intraperitoneal). The effect of ISO, TBE, CH, and PS on LV systolic function was measured at 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, and 10 min after anesthesia. The results showed that LV systolic function and heart rate (HR) of anesthetized mice were reduced significantly (P<0.05), compared with results in the same mice studied in the conscious state. In addition, the results indicated that the anesthetic with the least effect on LV function was CH, and followed by TBE, PS, ISO. We conclude that different anesthetic agents always depressed the HR and LV systolic function of mice, and, furthermore, the effects and time trends of different anesthetics on LV function are different. In echocardiographic experiments, we should choose proper anesthetic agents according to the experimental requirements.
- 650 _2
- $a anestetika $x toxicita $7 D000777
- 650 _2
- $a zvířata $7 D000818
- 650 _2
- $a echokardiografie $x účinky léků $x metody $7 D004452
- 650 _2
- $a srdeční frekvence $x účinky léků $x fyziologie $7 D006339
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a myši $7 D051379
- 650 _2
- $a myši inbrední C57BL $7 D008810
- 650 _2
- $a náhodné rozdělení $7 D011897
- 650 _2
- $a tepový objem $x účinky léků $x fyziologie $7 D013318
- 650 _2
- $a systola $x účinky léků $x fyziologie $7 D013599
- 650 _2
- $a dysfunkce levé srdeční komory $x chemicky indukované $x diagnostické zobrazování $x patofyziologie $7 D018487
- 650 _2
- $a funkce levé komory srdeční $x účinky léků $x fyziologie $7 D016277
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Dai, J. $u Department of Clinical Diagnostics, Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China
- 700 1_
- $a Wu, F. $u Department of Physiology, Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China and School of Basic Medical Sciences, Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China
- 700 1_
- $a Zhang, H. $u School of Basic Medical Sciences, Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China
- 773 0_
- $w MED00003824 $t Physiological research $x 1802-9973 $g Roč. 68, č. 3 (2019), s. 365-374
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30904003 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b A 4120 $c 266 $y p $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20200107 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20200122093643 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1485095 $s 1082450
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2019 $b 68 $c 3 $d 365-374 $e 20190322 $i 1802-9973 $m Physiological research $n Physiol. Res. (Print) $x MED00003824
- LZP __
- $b NLK118 $a Pubmed-20200107