-
Something wrong with this record ?
The large genome size variation in the Hesperis clade was shaped by the prevalent proliferation of DNA repeats and rarer genome downsizing
P. Hloušková, T. Mandáková, M. Pouch, P. Trávníček, MA. Lysak,
Language English Country Great Britain
Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
NLK
PubMed Central
from 1995 to 1 year ago
Europe PubMed Central
from 1995 to 1 year ago
Open Access Digital Library
from 1993-01-01
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost)
from 1996-01-01 to 1 year ago
PubMed
31220201
DOI
10.1093/aob/mcz036
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- MeSH
- Brassicaceae * MeSH
- Genome Size MeSH
- Phylogeny MeSH
- Genome, Plant * MeSH
- In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence MeSH
- Evolution, Molecular MeSH
- Cell Proliferation MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Most crucifer species (Brassicaceae) have small nuclear genomes (mean 1C-value 617 Mb). The species with the largest genomes occur within the monophyletic Hesperis clade (Mandáková et al., Plant Physiology174: 2062-2071; also known as Clade E or Lineage III). Whereas most chromosome numbers in the clade are 6 or 7, monoploid genome sizes vary 16-fold (256-4264 Mb). To get an insight into genome size evolution in the Hesperis clade (~350 species in ~48 genera), we aimed to identify, quantify and localize in situ the repeats from which these genomes are built. We analysed nuclear repeatomes in seven species, covering the phylogenetic and genome size breadth of the clade, by low-pass whole-genome sequencing. METHODS: Genome size was estimated by flow cytometry. Genomic DNA was sequenced on an Illumina sequencer and DNA repeats were identified and quantified using RepeatExplorer; the most abundant repeats were localized on chromosomes by fluorescence in situ hybridization. To evaluate the feasibility of bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC)-based comparative chromosome painting in Hesperis-clade species, BACs of arabidopsis were used as painting probes. KEY RESULTS: Most biennial and perennial species of the Hesperis clade possess unusually large nuclear genomes due to the proliferation of long terminal repeat retrotransposons. The prevalent genome expansion was rarely, but repeatedly, counteracted by purging of transposable elements in ephemeral and annual species. CONCLUSIONS: The most common ancestor of the Hesperis clade has experienced genome upsizing due to transposable element amplification. Further genome size increases, dominating diversification of all Hesperis-clade tribes, contrast with the overall stability of chromosome numbers. In some subclades and species genome downsizing occurred, presumably as an adaptive transition to an annual life cycle. The amplification versus purging of transposable elements and tandem repeats impacted the chromosomal architecture of the Hesperis-clade species.
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc20006231
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20200518132439.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 200511s2019 xxk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1093/aob/mcz036 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)31220201
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxk
- 100 1_
- $a Hloušková, Petra $u CEITEC - Central European Institute of Technology, and Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Kamenice, Brno, Czech Republic.
- 245 14
- $a The large genome size variation in the Hesperis clade was shaped by the prevalent proliferation of DNA repeats and rarer genome downsizing / $c P. Hloušková, T. Mandáková, M. Pouch, P. Trávníček, MA. Lysak,
- 520 9_
- $a BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Most crucifer species (Brassicaceae) have small nuclear genomes (mean 1C-value 617 Mb). The species with the largest genomes occur within the monophyletic Hesperis clade (Mandáková et al., Plant Physiology174: 2062-2071; also known as Clade E or Lineage III). Whereas most chromosome numbers in the clade are 6 or 7, monoploid genome sizes vary 16-fold (256-4264 Mb). To get an insight into genome size evolution in the Hesperis clade (~350 species in ~48 genera), we aimed to identify, quantify and localize in situ the repeats from which these genomes are built. We analysed nuclear repeatomes in seven species, covering the phylogenetic and genome size breadth of the clade, by low-pass whole-genome sequencing. METHODS: Genome size was estimated by flow cytometry. Genomic DNA was sequenced on an Illumina sequencer and DNA repeats were identified and quantified using RepeatExplorer; the most abundant repeats were localized on chromosomes by fluorescence in situ hybridization. To evaluate the feasibility of bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC)-based comparative chromosome painting in Hesperis-clade species, BACs of arabidopsis were used as painting probes. KEY RESULTS: Most biennial and perennial species of the Hesperis clade possess unusually large nuclear genomes due to the proliferation of long terminal repeat retrotransposons. The prevalent genome expansion was rarely, but repeatedly, counteracted by purging of transposable elements in ephemeral and annual species. CONCLUSIONS: The most common ancestor of the Hesperis clade has experienced genome upsizing due to transposable element amplification. Further genome size increases, dominating diversification of all Hesperis-clade tribes, contrast with the overall stability of chromosome numbers. In some subclades and species genome downsizing occurred, presumably as an adaptive transition to an annual life cycle. The amplification versus purging of transposable elements and tandem repeats impacted the chromosomal architecture of the Hesperis-clade species.
- 650 12
- $a Brassicaceae $7 D019607
- 650 _2
- $a proliferace buněk $7 D049109
- 650 _2
- $a molekulární evoluce $7 D019143
- 650 _2
- $a délka genomu $7 D059646
- 650 12
- $a genom rostlinný $7 D018745
- 650 _2
- $a hybridizace in situ fluorescenční $7 D017404
- 650 _2
- $a fylogeneze $7 D010802
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Mandáková, Terezie $u CEITEC - Central European Institute of Technology, and Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Kamenice, Brno, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Pouch, Milan $u CEITEC - Central European Institute of Technology, and Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Kamenice, Brno, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Trávníček, Pavel $u Institute of Botany, Czech Academy of Sciences, Zámek 1, 252 43 Průhonice, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Lysak, Martin A $u CEITEC - Central European Institute of Technology, and Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Kamenice, Brno, Czech Republic.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00000419 $t Annals of botany $x 1095-8290 $g Roč. 124, č. 1 (2019), s. 103-120
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31220201 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20200511 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20200518132439 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1525089 $s 1096287
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2019 $b 124 $c 1 $d 103-120 $e 20190802 $i 1095-8290 $m Annals of botany $n Ann. bot. (Print) $x MED00000419
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20200511