Detail
Článek
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

The effect of postponement of first motherhood on permanent involuntary childlessness and total fertility rate in six European countries since the 1970s

E. te Velde, D. Habbema, H. Leridon, M. Eijkemans,

. 2012 ; 27 (4) : 1179-1183. [pub] 20120118

Jazyk angličtina Země Velká Británie

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc20014942

BACKGROUND: Postponement of childbearing since the 1970s has led to an increase in permanent involuntarily childlessness. We will address the magnitude of this trend, the effect of IVF/ICSI and the effect on total fertility rate (TFR an often used demographic measure for the level of fertility) in six EU countries. METHODS: Using a fertility micro-simulation model, we estimate the effect of postponement of first motherhood on permanent involuntary childlessness in six representative European countries since 1970/1985: Sweden, Austria, Czech Republic, The Netherlands, West Germany and Spain. To estimate the effect of IVF/ICSI on this trend, we use data on the results of all IVF/ICSI cycles performed in The Netherlands in 2003 and 2004. RESULTS: Permanent involuntary childlessness approximately doubled since 1970s and rose to ~4% in the Czech Republic and to ~7% in Spain with the other countries in between. If all couples entitled to have IVF/ICSI were to be treated, the effect of postponement would almost have been neutralized. However, only a limited proportion of eligible couple are being treated. Without postponement, TFRs would have been between 0.03 and 0.05 higher. CONCLUSIONS: The effect of postponement on permanent involuntary childlessness is considerable. So far IVF/ICSI only had a slight effect on this trend. The impact of postponement on TFRs is small compared with other demographic trends.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc20014942
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20200929120747.0
007      
ta
008      
200922s2012 xxk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1093/humrep/der455 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)22258662
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxk
100    1_
$a te Velde, Egbert $u Department of Public Health, Erasmus University MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. e.r.tevelde@ziggo.nl
245    14
$a The effect of postponement of first motherhood on permanent involuntary childlessness and total fertility rate in six European countries since the 1970s / $c E. te Velde, D. Habbema, H. Leridon, M. Eijkemans,
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: Postponement of childbearing since the 1970s has led to an increase in permanent involuntarily childlessness. We will address the magnitude of this trend, the effect of IVF/ICSI and the effect on total fertility rate (TFR an often used demographic measure for the level of fertility) in six EU countries. METHODS: Using a fertility micro-simulation model, we estimate the effect of postponement of first motherhood on permanent involuntary childlessness in six representative European countries since 1970/1985: Sweden, Austria, Czech Republic, The Netherlands, West Germany and Spain. To estimate the effect of IVF/ICSI on this trend, we use data on the results of all IVF/ICSI cycles performed in The Netherlands in 2003 and 2004. RESULTS: Permanent involuntary childlessness approximately doubled since 1970s and rose to ~4% in the Czech Republic and to ~7% in Spain with the other countries in between. If all couples entitled to have IVF/ICSI were to be treated, the effect of postponement would almost have been neutralized. However, only a limited proportion of eligible couple are being treated. Without postponement, TFRs would have been between 0.03 and 0.05 higher. CONCLUSIONS: The effect of postponement on permanent involuntary childlessness is considerable. So far IVF/ICSI only had a slight effect on this trend. The impact of postponement on TFRs is small compared with other demographic trends.
650    _2
$a dospělí $7 D000328
650    _2
$a porodnost $x trendy $7 D001723
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a fertilita $7 D005298
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a infertilita $7 D007246
650    12
$a věk matky $7 D008423
650    12
$a reprodukční chování $7 D043762
650    _2
$a asistovaná reprodukce $7 D027724
650    _2
$a socioekonomické faktory $7 D012959
651    _2
$a Rakousko $7 D001317
651    _2
$a Česká republika $7 D018153
651    _2
$a Německo západní $7 D005860
651    _2
$a Nizozemsko $7 D009426
651    _2
$a Španělsko $7 D013030
651    _2
$a Švédsko $7 D013548
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Habbema, Dik
700    1_
$a Leridon, Henri
700    1_
$a Eijkemans, Marinus
773    0_
$w MED00002081 $t Human reproduction (Oxford, England) $x 1460-2350 $g Roč. 27, č. 4 (2012), s. 1179-1183
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22258662 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20200922 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20200929120743 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1567799 $s 1105102
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2012 $b 27 $c 4 $d 1179-1183 $e 20120118 $i 1460-2350 $m Human reproduction $n Hum. reprod. (Oxf., Print) $x MED00002081
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20200922

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Pouze přihlášení uživatelé

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...