-
Something wrong with this record ?
SELECTION OF SUITABLE SAMPLING TOOL FOR RELIABLE SOIL SAMPLING NOT ONLY AFTER RADIOLOGICAL ACCIDENT
M. Setnička, T. Kroupa, A. Čtvrtečková, R. Marek,
Language English Country Great Britain
Document type Journal Article
PubMed
31711212
DOI
10.1093/rpd/ncz214
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Radiation Monitoring methods MeSH
- Specimen Handling standards MeSH
- Soil Pollutants, Radioactive analysis MeSH
- Radioactive Fallout analysis MeSH
- Quality Control MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
The objective of this research was to develop a sampling protocol for contaminated soils after a large radiological accident. One of the criteria for good sampling method is reproducibility and accuracy of large number of samples collected in short time. Members of the chemical laboratories of the Fire Rescue Service of the Czech Republic (FRS CR), which are included in Radiation Monitoring Network, tested four tools in different soil types. More than 100 samples were collected. Root auger and square soil sampler seem to be the best for reliable soil sampling. Modifications of the root auger decreased of relative error of sampling to 7.5%. The root auger is recommended as a first-choice sampling tool based on: (1) ease, (2) operator safety, (3) collection of a representative sample (4) applicability to most soil types and (5) enabling collection of depth-discrete samples.
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc20025367
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20201222153847.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 201125s2019 xxk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1093/rpd/ncz214 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)31711212
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxk
- 100 1_
- $a Setnička, Michal $u Population Protection Institute, Na Lužci 204, 53341 Lázně Bohdaneč, Czech Republic.
- 245 10
- $a SELECTION OF SUITABLE SAMPLING TOOL FOR RELIABLE SOIL SAMPLING NOT ONLY AFTER RADIOLOGICAL ACCIDENT / $c M. Setnička, T. Kroupa, A. Čtvrtečková, R. Marek,
- 520 9_
- $a The objective of this research was to develop a sampling protocol for contaminated soils after a large radiological accident. One of the criteria for good sampling method is reproducibility and accuracy of large number of samples collected in short time. Members of the chemical laboratories of the Fire Rescue Service of the Czech Republic (FRS CR), which are included in Radiation Monitoring Network, tested four tools in different soil types. More than 100 samples were collected. Root auger and square soil sampler seem to be the best for reliable soil sampling. Modifications of the root auger decreased of relative error of sampling to 7.5%. The root auger is recommended as a first-choice sampling tool based on: (1) ease, (2) operator safety, (3) collection of a representative sample (4) applicability to most soil types and (5) enabling collection of depth-discrete samples.
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a řízení kvality $7 D011786
- 650 _2
- $a monitorování radiace $x metody $7 D011834
- 650 _2
- $a radioaktivní spad $x analýza $7 D011847
- 650 _2
- $a radioaktivní látky znečišťující půdu $x analýza $7 D012990
- 650 _2
- $a odběr biologického vzorku $x normy $7 D013048
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Kroupa, Tomáš $u Population Protection Institute, Na Lužci 204, 53341 Lázně Bohdaneč, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Čtvrtečková, Alena $u Population Protection Institute, Na Lužci 204, 53341 Lázně Bohdaneč, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Marek, René $u Population Protection Institute, Na Lužci 204, 53341 Lázně Bohdaneč, Czech Republic.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00004029 $t Radiation protection dosimetry $x 1742-3406 $g Roč. 186, č. 2-3 (2019), s. 257-262
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31711212 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20201125 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20201222153843 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1599512 $s 1116053
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2019 $b 186 $c 2-3 $d 257-262 $e 2019Dec31 $i 1742-3406 $m Radiation protection dosimetry $n Radiat Prot Dosimetry $x MED00004029
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20201125
