-
Something wrong with this record ?
Evolution of clonal growth forms in angiosperms
T. Herben, J. Klimešová,
Language English Country Great Britain
Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
NLK
Free Medical Journals
from 1902 to 1 year ago
Wiley Free Content
from 1997 to 1 year ago
PubMed
31505049
DOI
10.1111/nph.16188
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- MeSH
- Biological Evolution * MeSH
- Clone Cells MeSH
- Phylogeny MeSH
- Magnoliopsida growth & development MeSH
- Organ Specificity MeSH
- Likelihood Functions MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
Clonal growth of plants is attained by a number of morphologically different organs (e.g. stolons, rhizomes, and roots), which are not functionally equivalent. Consequently, these clonal growth organ (CGO) types can determine functional traits that are associated with clonality, although little is known about their evolutionary flexibility or the constraining role they play on clonal traits. We investigated the rates of evolutionary change by which individual CGOs are acquired and lost using a set of 2652 species of Central European flora. Furthermore, we asked how these individual CGOs constrain functionally relevant clonal traits, such as lateral spread, number of offspring, and persistence of connections. We show that plants can easily switch in evolution among individual types of CGO and between clonal and nonclonal habits. However, not all these transitions are equally probable. Namely, stem-based clonal growth and root-based clonal growth constitute evolutionarily separate forms of clonal growth. Clonal traits are strongly constrained by individual CGO types. Specifically, fast lateral spread is attained by stolons or hypogeogenous rhizomes, and persistent connections are attained by all rhizome types. However, the ease with which clonal organs appear and disappear in evolution implies that plants can overcome these constraints by adjusting their morphologies.
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc20028671
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20210114154647.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 210105s2020 xxk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1111/nph.16188 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)31505049
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxk
- 100 1_
- $a Herben, Tomáš $u Institute of Botany, Czech Academy of Sciences, CZ-252 43, Průhonice, Czech Republic. Department of Botany, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Benátská 2, CZ-128 01, Praha 2, Czech Republic.
- 245 10
- $a Evolution of clonal growth forms in angiosperms / $c T. Herben, J. Klimešová,
- 520 9_
- $a Clonal growth of plants is attained by a number of morphologically different organs (e.g. stolons, rhizomes, and roots), which are not functionally equivalent. Consequently, these clonal growth organ (CGO) types can determine functional traits that are associated with clonality, although little is known about their evolutionary flexibility or the constraining role they play on clonal traits. We investigated the rates of evolutionary change by which individual CGOs are acquired and lost using a set of 2652 species of Central European flora. Furthermore, we asked how these individual CGOs constrain functionally relevant clonal traits, such as lateral spread, number of offspring, and persistence of connections. We show that plants can easily switch in evolution among individual types of CGO and between clonal and nonclonal habits. However, not all these transitions are equally probable. Namely, stem-based clonal growth and root-based clonal growth constitute evolutionarily separate forms of clonal growth. Clonal traits are strongly constrained by individual CGO types. Specifically, fast lateral spread is attained by stolons or hypogeogenous rhizomes, and persistent connections are attained by all rhizome types. However, the ease with which clonal organs appear and disappear in evolution implies that plants can overcome these constraints by adjusting their morphologies.
- 650 12
- $a biologická evoluce $7 D005075
- 650 _2
- $a buněčné klony $7 D002999
- 650 _2
- $a pravděpodobnostní funkce $7 D016013
- 650 _2
- $a Magnoliopsida $x růst a vývoj $7 D019684
- 650 _2
- $a orgánová specificita $7 D009928
- 650 _2
- $a fylogeneze $7 D010802
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Klimešová, Jitka $u Department of Botany, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Benátská 2, CZ-128 01, Praha 2, Czech Republic. Institute of Botany, Czech Academy of Sciences, CZ-379 82, Třeboň, Czech Republic.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00007692 $t The New phytologist $x 1469-8137 $g Roč. 225, č. 2 (2020), s. 999-1010
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31505049 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20210105 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20210114154644 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1609006 $s 1119851
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2020 $b 225 $c 2 $d 999-1010 $e 20191014 $i 1469-8137 $m New phytologist $n New Phytol $x MED00007692
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20210105