Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

Contrast Tempo of Movement and Its Effect on Power Output and Bar Velocity During Resistance Exercise

M. Wilk, J. Jarosz, M. Krzysztofik, A. Filip-Stachnik, M. Bialas, A. Rzeszutko-Belzowska, A. Zajac, P. Stastny

. 2020 ; 11 (-) : 629199. [pub] 20210120

Language English Country Switzerland

Document type Journal Article

In this study, we examined the impact of contrast movement tempo (fast vs. slow) on power output and bar velocity during the bench press exercise. Ten healthy men (age = 26.9 ± 4.1 years; body mass = 90.5 ± 10.3 kg; bench press 1RM = 136.8 ± 27.7 kg) with significant experience in resistance training (9.4 ± 5.6 years) performed the bench press exercise under three conditions: with an explosive tempo of movement in each of three repetitions (E/E/E = explosive, explosive, explosive); with a slow tempo of movement in the first repetition and an explosive tempo in the next two repetitions (S/E/E = slow, explosive, explosive); and with a slow tempo of movement in the first two repetitions and an explosive tempo in the last repetition (S/S/E = slow, slow, explosive). The slow repetitions were performed with a 5/0/5/0 (eccentric/isometric/concentric/isometric) movement tempo, while the explosive repetitions were performed with an X/0/X/0 (X- maximal speed of movement) movement tempo. During each experimental session, the participants performed one set of three repetitions at 60%1RM. The two-way repeated measures ANOVA showed a statistically significant interaction effect for peak power output (PP; p = 0.03; η2 = 0.26) and for peak bar velocity (PV; p = 0.04; η2 = 0.24). Futhermore there was a statistically significant main effect of condition for PP (p = 0.04; η2 = 0.30) and PV (p = 0.02; η2 = 0.35). The post hoc analysis for interaction revealed that PP was significantly higher in the 2nd and 3rd repetition for E/E/E compared with the S/S/E (p < 0.01 for both) and significantly higher in the 2nd repetition for the S/E/E compared with S/S/E (p < 0.01). The post hoc analysis for interaction revealed that PV was significantly higher in the 2nd and 3rd repetition for E/E/E compared with the S/S/E (p < 0.01 for both), and significantly higher in the 2nd repetition for the S/E/E compared with the S/S/E (p < 0.01). The post hoc analysis for main effect of condition revealed that PP and PV was significantly higher for the E/E/E compared to the S/S/E (p = 0.04; p = 0.02; respectively). The main finding of this study was that different distribution of movement tempo during a set has a significant impact on power output and bar velocity in the bench press exercise at 60%1RM. However, the use of one slow repetition at the beginning of a set does not decrease the level of power output in the third repetition of that set.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc21010641
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20210610134152.0
007      
ta
008      
210413s2020 sz f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.3389/fphys.2020.629199 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)33551848
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a sz
100    1_
$a Wilk, Michal $u Institute of Sport Sciences, Jerzy Kukuczka Academy of Physical Education in Katowice, Katowice, Poland
245    10
$a Contrast Tempo of Movement and Its Effect on Power Output and Bar Velocity During Resistance Exercise / $c M. Wilk, J. Jarosz, M. Krzysztofik, A. Filip-Stachnik, M. Bialas, A. Rzeszutko-Belzowska, A. Zajac, P. Stastny
520    9_
$a In this study, we examined the impact of contrast movement tempo (fast vs. slow) on power output and bar velocity during the bench press exercise. Ten healthy men (age = 26.9 ± 4.1 years; body mass = 90.5 ± 10.3 kg; bench press 1RM = 136.8 ± 27.7 kg) with significant experience in resistance training (9.4 ± 5.6 years) performed the bench press exercise under three conditions: with an explosive tempo of movement in each of three repetitions (E/E/E = explosive, explosive, explosive); with a slow tempo of movement in the first repetition and an explosive tempo in the next two repetitions (S/E/E = slow, explosive, explosive); and with a slow tempo of movement in the first two repetitions and an explosive tempo in the last repetition (S/S/E = slow, slow, explosive). The slow repetitions were performed with a 5/0/5/0 (eccentric/isometric/concentric/isometric) movement tempo, while the explosive repetitions were performed with an X/0/X/0 (X- maximal speed of movement) movement tempo. During each experimental session, the participants performed one set of three repetitions at 60%1RM. The two-way repeated measures ANOVA showed a statistically significant interaction effect for peak power output (PP; p = 0.03; η2 = 0.26) and for peak bar velocity (PV; p = 0.04; η2 = 0.24). Futhermore there was a statistically significant main effect of condition for PP (p = 0.04; η2 = 0.30) and PV (p = 0.02; η2 = 0.35). The post hoc analysis for interaction revealed that PP was significantly higher in the 2nd and 3rd repetition for E/E/E compared with the S/S/E (p < 0.01 for both) and significantly higher in the 2nd repetition for the S/E/E compared with S/S/E (p < 0.01). The post hoc analysis for interaction revealed that PV was significantly higher in the 2nd and 3rd repetition for E/E/E compared with the S/S/E (p < 0.01 for both), and significantly higher in the 2nd repetition for the S/E/E compared with the S/S/E (p < 0.01). The post hoc analysis for main effect of condition revealed that PP and PV was significantly higher for the E/E/E compared to the S/S/E (p = 0.04; p = 0.02; respectively). The main finding of this study was that different distribution of movement tempo during a set has a significant impact on power output and bar velocity in the bench press exercise at 60%1RM. However, the use of one slow repetition at the beginning of a set does not decrease the level of power output in the third repetition of that set.
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Jarosz, Jakub $u Institute of Sport Sciences, Jerzy Kukuczka Academy of Physical Education in Katowice, Katowice, Poland
700    1_
$a Krzysztofik, Michal $u Institute of Sport Sciences, Jerzy Kukuczka Academy of Physical Education in Katowice, Katowice, Poland
700    1_
$a Filip-Stachnik, Aleksandra $u Institute of Sport Sciences, Jerzy Kukuczka Academy of Physical Education in Katowice, Katowice, Poland
700    1_
$a Bialas, Marcin $u Faculty of Physical Education, Gdańsk University of Physical Education and Sport, Gdańsk, Poland
700    1_
$a Rzeszutko-Belzowska, Agata $u College of Medical Sciences, Institute of Physical Culture Studies, University of Rzeszów, Rzeszów, Poland
700    1_
$a Zajac, Adam $u Institute of Sport Sciences, Jerzy Kukuczka Academy of Physical Education in Katowice, Katowice, Poland
700    1_
$a Stastny, Petr $u Department of Sport Games, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport, Charles University, Prague, Czechia
773    0_
$w MED00174601 $t Frontiers in physiology $x 1664-042X $g Roč. 11, č. - (2020), s. 629199
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33551848 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
990    __
$a 20210413 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20210610134152 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ind $b bmc $g 1649890 $s 1131017
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2020 $b 11 $c - $d 629199 $e 20210120 $i 1664-042X $m Frontiers in physiology $n Front. physiol. $x MED00174601
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20210413

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...