-
Something wrong with this record ?
Use of Standardized and Non-Standardized Tools for Measuring the Risk of Falls and Independence in Clinical Practice
J. Neugebauer, V. Tóthová, J. Doležalová
Language English Country Switzerland
Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
NLK
Free Medical Journals
from 2004
PubMed Central
from 2005
Europe PubMed Central
from 2005
ProQuest Central
from 2009-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
from 2004-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
from 2005-01-01
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost)
from 2008-12-01
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
from 2009-01-01
Public Health Database (ProQuest)
from 2009-01-01
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
from 2004
- MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Surveys and Questionnaires MeSH
- Risk Factors MeSH
- Accidental Falls * MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
- Geographicals
- Czech Republic MeSH
(1) Background: The use of standardized tools is regarded as the basis for an evidence-based assessment. The tools enable monitoring of complex events and the effectiveness of adopted interventions. Some healthcare facilities use standardized tools such as the Morse Fall Scale, but many use non-standardized tools created based on patient needs. Our study question was, why are non-standardized tools used when standardized tools are more beneficial and can be statistically evaluated and compared to other results; (2) Methods: We used a quantitative, non-standardized questionnaire to survey 1200 nurses, which was representative sample for the entire Czech Republic. All questionnaires were assessed in two phases (a) the frequency evaluation and descriptive analysis, and (b) hypotheses testing and correlation analyses; (3) Results: We found that the Conley Scale, Barthel test, and IADL test were preferred by many nurses. Furthermore, we found that nurses using standardized assessment scales noticed risk factors significantly more frequently but regarded the increased complexity of care to be psychologically demanding. (4) Conclusions: In patients with physical disabilities, both types of tools (internal non-standardized and standardized) are used to assess the risk of falls and independence; nurses generally welcomed the increase use of standardized tools in their facilities.
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc21019023
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20210830100555.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 210728s2021 sz f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.3390/ijerph18063226 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)33804715
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a sz
- 100 1_
- $a Neugebauer, Jan $u Institute of Nursing Midwifery and Social Sciences, Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, University of South Bohemia in Ceske Budejovice, 370 11 Ceske Budejovice, Czech Republic
- 245 10
- $a Use of Standardized and Non-Standardized Tools for Measuring the Risk of Falls and Independence in Clinical Practice / $c J. Neugebauer, V. Tóthová, J. Doležalová
- 520 9_
- $a (1) Background: The use of standardized tools is regarded as the basis for an evidence-based assessment. The tools enable monitoring of complex events and the effectiveness of adopted interventions. Some healthcare facilities use standardized tools such as the Morse Fall Scale, but many use non-standardized tools created based on patient needs. Our study question was, why are non-standardized tools used when standardized tools are more beneficial and can be statistically evaluated and compared to other results; (2) Methods: We used a quantitative, non-standardized questionnaire to survey 1200 nurses, which was representative sample for the entire Czech Republic. All questionnaires were assessed in two phases (a) the frequency evaluation and descriptive analysis, and (b) hypotheses testing and correlation analyses; (3) Results: We found that the Conley Scale, Barthel test, and IADL test were preferred by many nurses. Furthermore, we found that nurses using standardized assessment scales noticed risk factors significantly more frequently but regarded the increased complexity of care to be psychologically demanding. (4) Conclusions: In patients with physical disabilities, both types of tools (internal non-standardized and standardized) are used to assess the risk of falls and independence; nurses generally welcomed the increase use of standardized tools in their facilities.
- 650 12
- $a úrazy pádem $7 D000058
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a rizikové faktory $7 D012307
- 650 _2
- $a průzkumy a dotazníky $7 D011795
- 651 _2
- $a Česká republika $7 D018153
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Tóthová, Valérie $u Institute of Nursing Midwifery and Social Sciences, Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, University of South Bohemia in Ceske Budejovice, 370 11 Ceske Budejovice, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Doležalová, Jitka $u Institute of Nursing Midwifery and Social Sciences, Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, University of South Bohemia in Ceske Budejovice, 370 11 Ceske Budejovice, Czech Republic
- 773 0_
- $w MED00176090 $t International journal of environmental research and public health $x 1660-4601 $g Roč. 18, č. 6 (2021)
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33804715 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20210728 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20210830100555 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1689949 $s 1139469
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2021 $b 18 $c 6 $e 20210320 $i 1660-4601 $m International journal of environmental research and public health $n Int. j. environ. res. public health $x MED00176090
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20210728