Detail
Článek
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Ventricular activation pattern assessment during right ventricular pacing: Ultra-high-frequency ECG study

K. Curila, P. Jurak, J. Halamek, F. Prinzen, P. Waldauf, J. Karch, P. Stros, F. Plesinger, J. Mizner, M. Susankova, R. Prochazkova, O. Sussenbek, I. Viscor, V. Vondra, R. Smisek, P. Leinveber, P. Osmancik

. 2021 ; 32 (5) : 1385-1394. [pub] 20210311

Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc21025793

BACKGROUND: Right ventricular (RV) pacing causes delayed activation of remote ventricular segments. We used the ultra-high-frequency ECG (UHF-ECG) to describe ventricular depolarization when pacing different RV locations. METHODS: In 51 patients, temporary pacing was performed at the RV septum (mSp); further subclassified as right ventricular inflow tract (RVIT) and right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) for septal inflow and outflow positions (below or above the plane of His bundle in right anterior oblique), apex, anterior lateral wall, and at the basal RV septum with nonselective His bundle or RBB capture (nsHBorRBBp). The timings of UHF-ECG electrical activations were quantified as left ventricular lateral wall delay (LVLWd; V8 activation delay) and RV lateral wall delay (RVLWd; V1 activation delay). RESULTS: The LVLWd was shortest for nsHBorRBBp (11 ms [95% confidence interval = 5-17]), followed by the RVIT (19 ms [11-26]) and the RVOT (33 ms [27-40]; p < .01 between all of them), although the QRSd for the latter two were the same (153 ms (148-158) vs. 153 ms (148-158); p = .99). RV apical capture not only had a longer LVLWd (34 ms (26-43) compared to mSp (27 ms (20-34), p < .05), but its RVLWd (17 ms (9-25) was also the longest compared to other RV pacing sites (mean values for nsHBorRBBp, mSp, anterior and lateral wall captures being below 6 ms), p < .001 compared to each of them. CONCLUSION: RVIT pacing produces better ventricular synchrony compared to other RV pacing locations with myocardial capture. However, UHF-ECG ventricular dysynchrony seen during RVIT pacing is increased compared to concomitant capture of basal septal myocytes and His bundle or proximal right bundle branch.

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc21025793
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20220606132643.0
007      
ta
008      
211013s2021 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1111/jce.14985 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)33682277
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Curila, Karol $u Cardiocenter, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Prague, Czech Republic
245    10
$a Ventricular activation pattern assessment during right ventricular pacing: Ultra-high-frequency ECG study / $c K. Curila, P. Jurak, J. Halamek, F. Prinzen, P. Waldauf, J. Karch, P. Stros, F. Plesinger, J. Mizner, M. Susankova, R. Prochazkova, O. Sussenbek, I. Viscor, V. Vondra, R. Smisek, P. Leinveber, P. Osmancik
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: Right ventricular (RV) pacing causes delayed activation of remote ventricular segments. We used the ultra-high-frequency ECG (UHF-ECG) to describe ventricular depolarization when pacing different RV locations. METHODS: In 51 patients, temporary pacing was performed at the RV septum (mSp); further subclassified as right ventricular inflow tract (RVIT) and right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) for septal inflow and outflow positions (below or above the plane of His bundle in right anterior oblique), apex, anterior lateral wall, and at the basal RV septum with nonselective His bundle or RBB capture (nsHBorRBBp). The timings of UHF-ECG electrical activations were quantified as left ventricular lateral wall delay (LVLWd; V8 activation delay) and RV lateral wall delay (RVLWd; V1 activation delay). RESULTS: The LVLWd was shortest for nsHBorRBBp (11 ms [95% confidence interval = 5-17]), followed by the RVIT (19 ms [11-26]) and the RVOT (33 ms [27-40]; p < .01 between all of them), although the QRSd for the latter two were the same (153 ms (148-158) vs. 153 ms (148-158); p = .99). RV apical capture not only had a longer LVLWd (34 ms (26-43) compared to mSp (27 ms (20-34), p < .05), but its RVLWd (17 ms (9-25) was also the longest compared to other RV pacing sites (mean values for nsHBorRBBp, mSp, anterior and lateral wall captures being below 6 ms), p < .001 compared to each of them. CONCLUSION: RVIT pacing produces better ventricular synchrony compared to other RV pacing locations with myocardial capture. However, UHF-ECG ventricular dysynchrony seen during RVIT pacing is increased compared to concomitant capture of basal septal myocytes and His bundle or proximal right bundle branch.
650    _2
$a Hisův svazek $7 D002036
650    _2
$a kardiostimulace umělá $7 D002304
650    _2
$a elektrokardiografie $7 D004562
650    12
$a srdeční komory $x diagnostické zobrazování $7 D006352
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a kontrakce myokardu $7 D009200
650    12
$a mezikomorová přepážka $x diagnostické zobrazování $7 D054088
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Jurak, Pavel $u Institute of Scientific Instruments, Czech Academy of Sciences, Brno, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Halamek, Josef $u Institute of Scientific Instruments, Czech Academy of Sciences, Brno, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Prinzen, Frits $u Department of Physiology, Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht, Maastricht, the Netherlands
700    1_
$a Waldauf, Petr $u Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Charles University and University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Karch, Jakub $u Cardiocenter, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Prague, Czech Republic $7 xx0273614
700    1_
$a Stros, Petr $u Cardiocenter, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Plesinger, Filip $u Institute of Scientific Instruments, Czech Academy of Sciences, Brno, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Mizner, Jan $u Cardiocenter, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Prague, Czech Republic $7 xx0273613
700    1_
$a Sušánková, Markéta $u Cardiocenter, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Prague, Czech Republic $7 xx0273623
700    1_
$a Prochazkova, Radka $u Cardiocenter, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Sussenbek, Ondrej $u Cardiocenter, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Viscor, Ivo $u Institute of Scientific Instruments, Czech Academy of Sciences, Brno, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Vondra, Vlastimil $u Institute of Scientific Instruments, Czech Academy of Sciences, Brno, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Smisek, Radovan $u Institute of Scientific Instruments, Czech Academy of Sciences, Brno, Czech Republic $u Department of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Communication, Brno University of Technology, Brno, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Leinveber, Pavel $u International Clinical Research Center, St. Anne's University Hospital, Brno, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Osmancik, Pavel $u Cardiocenter, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Prague, Czech Republic
773    0_
$w MED00002569 $t Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology $x 1540-8167 $g Roč. 32, č. 5 (2021), s. 1385-1394
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33682277 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20211013 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20220606132641 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1714715 $s 1146300
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2021 $b 32 $c 5 $d 1385-1394 $e 20210311 $i 1540-8167 $m Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology $n J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol $x MED00002569
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20211013

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat...