• Something wrong with this record ?

The impact of lymphovascular invasion in patients treated with radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: An extensive updated systematic review and meta-analysis

J. Stangl-Kremser, G. Muto, AA. Grosso, A. Briganti, E. Comperat, F. Di Maida, R. Montironi, M. Remzi, B. Pradere, F. Soria, S. Albisinni, M. Roupret, SF. Shariat, A. Minervini, JY. Teoh, M. Moschini, A. Cimadamore, A. Mari, European Association...

. 2022 ; 40 (6) : 243-261. [pub] 20220228

Language English Country United States

Document type Journal Article, Meta-Analysis, Review, Systematic Review

Patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) often have a delayed diagnosis and by then, present with advanced disease which has been shown to be associated with lymphovascular invasion (LVI). It has been suggested to be involved in the metastatic cascade of the disease. In this review, we provide an extensive up-to-date summary of the current knowledge about the prognostic impact of LVI in patients undergoing radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). A systematic search of PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, EMBASE, and Web of Science for all reports published from 2010 through 2021 was performed. We performed pooled analyses of hazard ratios (HRs) and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of series that evaluated LVI as a prognostic factor in adults with UTUC who underwent RNU. The assessed oncological outcomes were disease recurrence, cancer-specific and overall survival. A meta-regression analysis was used to explore potential heterogeneity. A total of 58 series met the eligibility criteria for qualitative and quantitative synthesis. We included 29,829 patients, ranging from 101 to 2492 per study. All series were retrospective. LVI was present in 7,818 patients (26.2%). The median age of the patients was 69 years and the median follow-up was 40 months. In 40 of 58 studies (68.9%), adjuvant chemotherapy was given. The pooled HRs show that LVI predicts a greater risk of recurrence of the disease (pooled HR 1.43, 95% CI: 1.31-1.55, P = 0.000; I2 = 76.3%), and decreases cancer-specific survival (pooled HR 1.53, 95% CI: 1.41-1.66, P = 0.000; I2 = 72.3%) and overall survival (HR 1.56, 95% CI 1.45-1.69, P = 0.000; I2 = 62.9%). It can be concluded that LVI is a common histologic pattern in surgical specimen in patients undergoing RNU for UTUC. LVI predicts a greater risk of recurrence and mortality, thus it should be carefully assessed in clinical practice to determine prognosis, and for optimal decision-making within the concept of personalized therapies.

Department of Pathology University of Vienna Vienna Austria

Department of Urology 2nd Faculty of Medicine Charles University Prague Czech Republic

Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology URI Urological Research Institute IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute Milan Italy

Department of Urology University Clinics of Brussels Hôpital Erasme Université Libre de Bruxelles Brussels Belgium

Department of Urology University of Texas Southwestern Dallas TX

Department of Urology University of Vienna Vienna Austria

Department of Urology Weill Cornell Medical College New York NY

Division of Urology Department of Special Surgery Jordan University Hospital The University of Jordan Amman Jordan

Division of Urology Department of Surgical Sciences San Giovanni Battista Hospital University of Studies of Torino Turin Italy

European Association of Urology Research Foundation Arnhem Netherlands

Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health Sechenov University Moscow Russia

Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology Vienna Austria

Molecular Medicine and Cell Therapy Foundation Polytechnic University of the Marche Region Ancona Italy

S H Ho Urology Centre Department of Surgery Prince of Wales Hospital The Chinese University of Hong Kong Hong Kong China

Sorbonne University GRC 5 Predictive Onco Uro AP HP Urology Pitie Salpetriere Hospital Paris France

Unit of Oncologic Minimally Invasive Urology and Andrology Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine Careggi Hospital University of Florence Florence Italy

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc22018274
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20220804134652.0
007      
ta
008      
220720s2022 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1016/j.urolonc.2022.01.014 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)35241364
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Stangl-Kremser, Judith $u Department of Urology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. Electronic address: judithstangl@gmx.net
245    14
$a The impact of lymphovascular invasion in patients treated with radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: An extensive updated systematic review and meta-analysis / $c J. Stangl-Kremser, G. Muto, AA. Grosso, A. Briganti, E. Comperat, F. Di Maida, R. Montironi, M. Remzi, B. Pradere, F. Soria, S. Albisinni, M. Roupret, SF. Shariat, A. Minervini, JY. Teoh, M. Moschini, A. Cimadamore, A. Mari, European Association of Urology-Young Academic Urologists (EAU-YAU): Urothelial carcinoma working group
520    9_
$a Patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) often have a delayed diagnosis and by then, present with advanced disease which has been shown to be associated with lymphovascular invasion (LVI). It has been suggested to be involved in the metastatic cascade of the disease. In this review, we provide an extensive up-to-date summary of the current knowledge about the prognostic impact of LVI in patients undergoing radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). A systematic search of PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, EMBASE, and Web of Science for all reports published from 2010 through 2021 was performed. We performed pooled analyses of hazard ratios (HRs) and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of series that evaluated LVI as a prognostic factor in adults with UTUC who underwent RNU. The assessed oncological outcomes were disease recurrence, cancer-specific and overall survival. A meta-regression analysis was used to explore potential heterogeneity. A total of 58 series met the eligibility criteria for qualitative and quantitative synthesis. We included 29,829 patients, ranging from 101 to 2492 per study. All series were retrospective. LVI was present in 7,818 patients (26.2%). The median age of the patients was 69 years and the median follow-up was 40 months. In 40 of 58 studies (68.9%), adjuvant chemotherapy was given. The pooled HRs show that LVI predicts a greater risk of recurrence of the disease (pooled HR 1.43, 95% CI: 1.31-1.55, P = 0.000; I2 = 76.3%), and decreases cancer-specific survival (pooled HR 1.53, 95% CI: 1.41-1.66, P = 0.000; I2 = 72.3%) and overall survival (HR 1.56, 95% CI 1.45-1.69, P = 0.000; I2 = 62.9%). It can be concluded that LVI is a common histologic pattern in surgical specimen in patients undergoing RNU for UTUC. LVI predicts a greater risk of recurrence and mortality, thus it should be carefully assessed in clinical practice to determine prognosis, and for optimal decision-making within the concept of personalized therapies.
650    _2
$a senioři $7 D000368
650    12
$a karcinom z přechodných buněk $x patologie $7 D002295
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a lokální recidiva nádoru $x chirurgie $7 D009364
650    _2
$a nefroureterektomie $7 D000074682
650    _2
$a prognóza $7 D011379
650    _2
$a retrospektivní studie $7 D012189
650    12
$a nádory močovodu $x patologie $7 D014516
650    12
$a nádory močového měchýře $x chirurgie $7 D001749
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a metaanalýza $7 D017418
655    _2
$a přehledy $7 D016454
655    _2
$a systematický přehled $7 D000078182
700    1_
$a Muto, Gianluca $u Unit of Oncologic Minimally-Invasive Urology and Andrology, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
700    1_
$a Grosso, Antonio Andrea $u Unit of Oncologic Minimally-Invasive Urology and Andrology, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
700    1_
$a Briganti, Alberto $u Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
700    1_
$a Comperat, Eva $u Department of Pathology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
700    1_
$a Di Maida, Fabrizio $u Unit of Oncologic Minimally-Invasive Urology and Andrology, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
700    1_
$a Montironi, Rodolfo $u Molecular Medicine and Cell Therapy Foundation, Polytechnic University of the Marche Region, Ancona, Italy
700    1_
$a Remzi, Mesut $u Department of Urology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
700    1_
$a Pradere, Benjamin $u Department of Urology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
700    1_
$a Soria, Francesco $u Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, University of Studies of Torino, Turin, Italy
700    1_
$a Albisinni, Simone $u Department of Urology, University Clinics of Brussels, Hôpital Erasme Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
700    1_
$a Roupret, Morgan $u Sorbonne University, GRC 5 Predictive Onco-Uro, AP-HP, Urology, Pitie-Salpetriere Hospital, Paris, France
700    1_
$a Shariat, Shahrokh Francois $u Department of Urology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; European Association of Urology Research Foundation, Arnhem, Netherlands; Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria; Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia; Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX; Division of Urology, Department of Special Surgery, Jordan University Hospital, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan; Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Minervini, Andrea $u Unit of Oncologic Minimally-Invasive Urology and Andrology, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
700    1_
$a Teoh, Jeremy Yuen-Chun $u S.H. Ho Urology Centre, Department of Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
700    1_
$a Moschini, Marco $u Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
700    1_
$a Cimadamore, Alessia $u Molecular Medicine and Cell Therapy Foundation, Polytechnic University of the Marche Region, Ancona, Italy
700    1_
$a Mari, Andrea $u Unit of Oncologic Minimally-Invasive Urology and Andrology, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
710    2_
$a European Association of Urology-Young Academic Urologists (EAU-YAU): Urothelial carcinoma working group
773    0_
$w MED00008671 $t Urologic oncology $x 1873-2496 $g Roč. 40, č. 6 (2022), s. 243-261
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35241364 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20220720 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20220804134646 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1822056 $s 1169517
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2022 $b 40 $c 6 $d 243-261 $e 20220228 $i 1873-2496 $m Urologic oncology $n Urol Oncol $x MED00008671
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20220720

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...