-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Variability of fluorescence intensity distribution measured by flow cytometry is influenced by cell size and cell cycle progression
R. Fedr, Z. Kahounová, J. Remšík, M. Reiterová, T. Kalina, K. Souček
Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
Grantová podpora
P30 CA008748
NCI NIH HHS - United States
NLK
Directory of Open Access Journals
od 2011
Free Medical Journals
od 2011
Nature Open Access
od 2011-12-01
PubMed Central
od 2011
Europe PubMed Central
od 2011
ProQuest Central
od 2011-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
od 2011-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
od 2011-01-01
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
od 2011-01-01
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
od 2011
Springer Nature OA/Free Journals
od 2011-12-01
- MeSH
- buněčné dělení MeSH
- buněčný cyklus fyziologie MeSH
- G2 fáze * MeSH
- průtoková cytometrie metody MeSH
- velikost buňky MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
The distribution of fluorescence signals measured with flow cytometry can be influenced by several factors, including qualitative and quantitative properties of the used fluorochromes, optical properties of the detection system, as well as the variability within the analyzed cell population itself. Most of the single cell samples prepared from in vitrocultures or clinical specimens contain a variable cell cycle component. Cell cycle, together with changes in the cell size, are two of the factors that alter the functional properties of analyzed cells and thus affect the interpretation of obtained results. Here, we describe the association between cell cycle status and cell size, and the variability in the distribution of fluorescence intensity as determined with flow cytometry, at population scale. We show that variability in the distribution of background and specific fluorescence signals is related to the cell cycle state of the selected population, with the 10% low fluorescence signal fraction enriched mainly in cells in their G0/G1 cell cycle phase, and the 10% high fraction containing cells mostly in the G2/M phase. Therefore we advise using caution and additional experimental validation when comparing populations defined by fractions at both ends of fluorescence signal distribution to avoid biases caused by the effect of cell cycle and cell size.
Department of Experimental Biology Faculty of Science Masaryk University Brno Czech Republic
Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center New York NY 10065 USA
International Clinical Research Center St Anne's University Hospital Brno Brno Czech Republic
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc23003748
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20230425140848.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 230418s2023 enk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1038/s41598-023-31990-1 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)36966193
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a enk
- 100 1_
- $a Fedr, Radek $u Department of Cytokinetics, Institute of Biophysics of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Královopolská 135, 612 00, Brno, Czech Republic $u International Clinical Research Center, St. Anne's University Hospital Brno, Brno, Czech Republic
- 245 10
- $a Variability of fluorescence intensity distribution measured by flow cytometry is influenced by cell size and cell cycle progression / $c R. Fedr, Z. Kahounová, J. Remšík, M. Reiterová, T. Kalina, K. Souček
- 520 9_
- $a The distribution of fluorescence signals measured with flow cytometry can be influenced by several factors, including qualitative and quantitative properties of the used fluorochromes, optical properties of the detection system, as well as the variability within the analyzed cell population itself. Most of the single cell samples prepared from in vitrocultures or clinical specimens contain a variable cell cycle component. Cell cycle, together with changes in the cell size, are two of the factors that alter the functional properties of analyzed cells and thus affect the interpretation of obtained results. Here, we describe the association between cell cycle status and cell size, and the variability in the distribution of fluorescence intensity as determined with flow cytometry, at population scale. We show that variability in the distribution of background and specific fluorescence signals is related to the cell cycle state of the selected population, with the 10% low fluorescence signal fraction enriched mainly in cells in their G0/G1 cell cycle phase, and the 10% high fraction containing cells mostly in the G2/M phase. Therefore we advise using caution and additional experimental validation when comparing populations defined by fractions at both ends of fluorescence signal distribution to avoid biases caused by the effect of cell cycle and cell size.
- 650 _2
- $a průtoková cytometrie $x metody $7 D005434
- 650 _2
- $a buněčné dělení $7 D002455
- 650 _2
- $a buněčný cyklus $x fyziologie $7 D002453
- 650 12
- $a G2 fáze $7 D016195
- 650 _2
- $a velikost buňky $7 D048429
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Kahounová, Zuzana $u Department of Cytokinetics, Institute of Biophysics of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Královopolská 135, 612 00, Brno, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Remšík, Ján $u Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10065, USA
- 700 1_
- $a Reiterová, Michaela $u CLIP - Childhood Leukaemia Investigation Prague, Department of Pediatric Haematology and Oncology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and University Hospital Motol, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Kalina, Tomáš $u CLIP - Childhood Leukaemia Investigation Prague, Department of Pediatric Haematology and Oncology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and University Hospital Motol, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Souček, Karel $u Department of Cytokinetics, Institute of Biophysics of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Královopolská 135, 612 00, Brno, Czech Republic. ksoucek@ibp.cz $u International Clinical Research Center, St. Anne's University Hospital Brno, Brno, Czech Republic. ksoucek@ibp.cz $u Department of Experimental Biology, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic. ksoucek@ibp.cz
- 773 0_
- $w MED00182195 $t Scientific reports $x 2045-2322 $g Roč. 13, č. 1 (2023), s. 4889
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36966193 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20230418 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20230425140845 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1924430 $s 1189957
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC-MEDLINE
- BMC __
- $a 2023 $b 13 $c 1 $d 4889 $e 20230325 $i 2045-2322 $m Scientific reports $n Sci Rep $x MED00182195
- GRA __
- $a P30 CA008748 $p NCI NIH HHS $2 United States
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20230418