Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

Impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic on the management of acute peptic ulcer perforation: to be reconsidered(?)

L. Tulinský, I. Sengul, P. Ihnát, M. Mitták, D. Toman, A. Pelikán, L. Martínek, D. Sengul

. 2023 ; 69 (1) : 175-180. [pub] 20230109

Language English Country Brazil

Document type Journal Article

Persistent link   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc23004634

OBJECTIVE: Peptic ulcer perforation presents the most serious complication of ulcer disease with mortality that varies significantly depending on the age and conditions. The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic was effective worldwide in 2020 and continues to date. The aim of this study was to investigate the initial clinical parameters and short-term outcomes of patients with acute peptic ulcer perforation before and during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted in the Department of Surgery, University Hospital Ostrava, Czech Republic. The patients undergoing surgical modality of a simple suture of peptic ulcer perforation with/without omentoplasty in the post-coronavirus disease 2019 (January 1, 2020 to December 31, 2021) and the pre-coronavirus disease 2019 (January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2019) had been incorporated in this study. RESULTS: This study included a total of 46 cases (26 in the pre-coronavirus disease 2019, 20 in the post-coronavirus disease 2019). The age, body mass index, Boey score, duration of symptoms, surgery time, and length of hospital stay were comparable in both study subgroups. During the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, patients were admitted with a statistically significantly lower degree of perioperative risk according to the American Society of Anesthesiologists classification (p=0.013). Notably, 30-day postoperative morbidity was significantly higher in pre-coronavirus disease 2019 (73.1 vs. 55.0%, p=0.038). The mortality rate in the laparoscopic group was 13.6%, in the laparotomy group 41.4%, and the mortality rate was higher in pre-coronavirus disease 2019 than in post-coronavirus disease 2019 (34.6 vs. 20.0%, p=0.166). CONCLUSION: In fact, the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic had not significantly influenced therapeutic management and short-term outcomes of patients undergoing acute surgical repair of peptic ulcer perforation.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc23004634
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20230425171632.0
007      
ta
008      
230418s2023 bl f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1590/1806-9282.20221243 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)36629661
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a bl
100    1_
$a Tulinský, Lubomír $u Ostravská Univerzita, Department of General Surgery - Ostrava, Czech Republic $u Ostravská Univerzita, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Surgical Studies - Ostrava, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000331005990
245    10
$a Impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic on the management of acute peptic ulcer perforation: to be reconsidered(?) / $c L. Tulinský, I. Sengul, P. Ihnát, M. Mitták, D. Toman, A. Pelikán, L. Martínek, D. Sengul
520    9_
$a OBJECTIVE: Peptic ulcer perforation presents the most serious complication of ulcer disease with mortality that varies significantly depending on the age and conditions. The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic was effective worldwide in 2020 and continues to date. The aim of this study was to investigate the initial clinical parameters and short-term outcomes of patients with acute peptic ulcer perforation before and during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted in the Department of Surgery, University Hospital Ostrava, Czech Republic. The patients undergoing surgical modality of a simple suture of peptic ulcer perforation with/without omentoplasty in the post-coronavirus disease 2019 (January 1, 2020 to December 31, 2021) and the pre-coronavirus disease 2019 (January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2019) had been incorporated in this study. RESULTS: This study included a total of 46 cases (26 in the pre-coronavirus disease 2019, 20 in the post-coronavirus disease 2019). The age, body mass index, Boey score, duration of symptoms, surgery time, and length of hospital stay were comparable in both study subgroups. During the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, patients were admitted with a statistically significantly lower degree of perioperative risk according to the American Society of Anesthesiologists classification (p=0.013). Notably, 30-day postoperative morbidity was significantly higher in pre-coronavirus disease 2019 (73.1 vs. 55.0%, p=0.038). The mortality rate in the laparoscopic group was 13.6%, in the laparotomy group 41.4%, and the mortality rate was higher in pre-coronavirus disease 2019 than in post-coronavirus disease 2019 (34.6 vs. 20.0%, p=0.166). CONCLUSION: In fact, the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic had not significantly influenced therapeutic management and short-term outcomes of patients undergoing acute surgical repair of peptic ulcer perforation.
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    12
$a perforace peptického vředu $x diagnóza $x etiologie $x chirurgie $7 D010439
650    _2
$a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
650    _2
$a pooperační komplikace $x epidemiologie $7 D011183
650    _2
$a retrospektivní studie $7 D012189
650    _2
$a pandemie $7 D058873
650    12
$a COVID-19 $x komplikace $7 D000086382
650    12
$a laparoskopie $x škodlivé účinky $7 D010535
650    _2
$a akutní nemoc $7 D000208
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Sengul, Ilker $u Giresun University, Faculty of Medicine, Division of Endocrine Surgery - Giresun, Turkey $u Giresun University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Surgery - Giresun, Turkey $1 https://orcid.org/0000000152170755
700    1_
$a Ihnát, Peter $u Ostravská Univerzita, Department of General Surgery - Ostrava, Czech Republic $u Ostravská Univerzita, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Surgical Studies - Ostrava, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000163536257 $7 xx0211685
700    1_
$a Mitták, Marcel $u Ostravská Univerzita, Department of General Surgery - Ostrava, Czech Republic $u Ostravská Univerzita, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Surgical Studies - Ostrava, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000324682504 $7 xx0085126
700    1_
$a Toman, Daniel $u Ostravská Univerzita, Department of General Surgery - Ostrava, Czech Republic $u Ostravská Univerzita, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Surgical Studies - Ostrava, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000266273162
700    1_
$a Pelikán, Anton $u Ostravská Univerzita, Department of General Surgery - Ostrava, Czech Republic $u Ostravská Univerzita, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Surgical Studies - Ostrava, Czech Republic $u Univerzita Tomáše Bati ve Zlíně, Faculty of Humanities - Zlín, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000243029298 $7 nlk19990073678
700    1_
$a Martínek, Lubomír $u Ostravská Univerzita, Department of General Surgery - Ostrava, Czech Republic $u Ostravská Univerzita, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Surgical Studies - Ostrava, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000151865651 $7 mzk2006317944
700    1_
$a Sengul, Demet $u Giresun University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Pathology - Giresun, Turkey $1 https://orcid.org/0000000204160621
773    0_
$w MED00181663 $t Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992) $x 1806-9282 $g Roč. 69, č. 1 (2023), s. 175-180
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36629661 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20230418 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20230425171628 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1924992 $s 1190843
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2023 $b 69 $c 1 $d 175-180 $e 20230109 $i 1806-9282 $m Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira $n Rev Assoc Med Bras $x MED00181663
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20230418

Find record

Citation metrics

Archiving options