• Something wrong with this record ?

Developing the better and effective nursing education for improving transcultural nursing skills cultural competence and cultural sensitivity assessment tool (BENEFITS-CCCSAT)

A. Yava, B. Tosun, K. Papp, V. Tóthová, E. Şahin, EB. Yılmaz, E. Dirgar, V. Hellerová, S. Tricas-Sauras, M. Prosen, S. Ličen, I. Karnjus, MDB. Tamayo, JM. Leyva-Moral

. 2023 ; 22 (1) : 331. [pub] 20230927

Status not-indexed Language English Country England, Great Britain

Document type Journal Article

Grant support
2019-1-TR01-KA203- 076879 Erasmus+

BACKGROUND: A clear need for the development of new comprehensive, reliable, sensitive and valid measurement tools to adequately asses the cultural competence and cultural sensitivity of nursing students exists. This study aimed to develop a new measurement tool to assess the nursing students' cultural competence and sensitivity. METHODS: This cross-sectional, instrument development study's first phase included postgraduate nursing students (n = 60) for the piloting study, and the second one included undergraduate nursing students (n = 459) for the main survey. This study used two data collection forms: The Student Descriptive Information Form and the Better and Effective Nursing Education for Improving Transcultural Nursing Skills Cultural Competence and Cultural Sensitivity Assessment Tool (BENEFITS-CCCSAT) draft. The content validity index was calculated using the Davis method. Cronbach's α coefficient and the item total correlation were calculated during the reliability analysis. The Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) coefficient test, Bartlett significance test, and explanatory factor analysis (EFA) were used to evaluate the validity of the assessment tool. RESULTS: Scale validity and reliability analyses showed that the BENEFITS-CCCSAT included 26 items and five sub-dimensions: respect for cultural diversity; culturally sensitive communication; achieving cultural competence; challenges and barriers in providing culturally competent care; and perceived meaning of cultural care. CONCLUSION: The BENEFITS-CCCSAT appears to be a valid and reliable instrument for measuring the cultural sensitivity and cultural competence of nursing students. This can be of great use, especially before attending clinical areas, and can offer both students and faculty reliable information to promote reflective and critical thinking, especially in areas where improvement is needed.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc23015229
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20231020093434.0
007      
ta
008      
231010s2023 enk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1186/s12912-023-01476-6 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)37752481
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a enk
100    1_
$a Yava, Ayla $u Faculty of Health Sciences, Nursing Department, Hasan Kalyoncu University, Gaziantep, Turkey
245    10
$a Developing the better and effective nursing education for improving transcultural nursing skills cultural competence and cultural sensitivity assessment tool (BENEFITS-CCCSAT) / $c A. Yava, B. Tosun, K. Papp, V. Tóthová, E. Şahin, EB. Yılmaz, E. Dirgar, V. Hellerová, S. Tricas-Sauras, M. Prosen, S. Ličen, I. Karnjus, MDB. Tamayo, JM. Leyva-Moral
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: A clear need for the development of new comprehensive, reliable, sensitive and valid measurement tools to adequately asses the cultural competence and cultural sensitivity of nursing students exists. This study aimed to develop a new measurement tool to assess the nursing students' cultural competence and sensitivity. METHODS: This cross-sectional, instrument development study's first phase included postgraduate nursing students (n = 60) for the piloting study, and the second one included undergraduate nursing students (n = 459) for the main survey. This study used two data collection forms: The Student Descriptive Information Form and the Better and Effective Nursing Education for Improving Transcultural Nursing Skills Cultural Competence and Cultural Sensitivity Assessment Tool (BENEFITS-CCCSAT) draft. The content validity index was calculated using the Davis method. Cronbach's α coefficient and the item total correlation were calculated during the reliability analysis. The Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) coefficient test, Bartlett significance test, and explanatory factor analysis (EFA) were used to evaluate the validity of the assessment tool. RESULTS: Scale validity and reliability analyses showed that the BENEFITS-CCCSAT included 26 items and five sub-dimensions: respect for cultural diversity; culturally sensitive communication; achieving cultural competence; challenges and barriers in providing culturally competent care; and perceived meaning of cultural care. CONCLUSION: The BENEFITS-CCCSAT appears to be a valid and reliable instrument for measuring the cultural sensitivity and cultural competence of nursing students. This can be of great use, especially before attending clinical areas, and can offer both students and faculty reliable information to promote reflective and critical thinking, especially in areas where improvement is needed.
590    __
$a NEINDEXOVÁNO
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Tosun, Betül $u Faculty of Health Sciences, Nursing Department, Hasan Kalyoncu University, Gaziantep, Turkey. tosunbetul@gmail.com $1 https://orcid.org/0000000245055887
700    1_
$a Papp, Katalin $u Nursing Department, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Debrecen, Nyíregyháza, Hungary
700    1_
$a Tóthová, Valérie $u Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, Institute of Nursing, Midwifery and Emergency Care, University of South Bohemia, České Budějovice, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Şahin, Eda $u Faculty of Health Sciences, Nursing Department, Giresun University, Giresun, Turkey
700    1_
$a Yılmaz, Emel Bahadir $u Faculty of Health Sciences, Nursing Department, Giresun University, Giresun, Turkey
700    1_
$a Dirgar, Ezgi $u Gaziantep University, Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Midwifery, Gaziantep, Turkey
700    1_
$a Hellerová, Věra $u Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, Institute of Nursing, Midwifery and Emergency Care, University of South Bohemia, České Budějovice, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Tricas-Sauras, Sandra $u Department of Healthcare, Design and Technology, Erasmus Hogeschool Brussel, Brussels, Belgium $u Social Approaches to Health Research Centre, School of Public Health, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium
700    1_
$a Prosen, Mirko $u Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Nursing, University of Primorska, Polje 42, Izola, 6310, Slovenia
700    1_
$a Ličen, Sabina $u Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Nursing, University of Primorska, Polje 42, Izola, 6310, Slovenia
700    1_
$a Karnjus, Igor $u Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Nursing, University of Primorska, Polje 42, Izola, 6310, Slovenia
700    1_
$a Tamayo, M Dolors Bernabeu $u Faculty of Medicine, Nursing Department, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
700    1_
$a Leyva-Moral, Juan M $u Faculty of Medicine, Nursing Department, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
773    0_
$w MED00008198 $t BMC nursing $x 1472-6955 $g Roč. 22, č. 1 (2023), s. 331
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37752481 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
990    __
$a 20231010 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20231020093427 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1997056 $s 1201591
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-PubMed-not-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2023 $b 22 $c 1 $d 331 $e 20230927 $i 1472-6955 $m BMC nursing $n BMC Nurs $x MED00008198
GRA    __
$a 2019-1-TR01-KA203- 076879 $p Erasmus+
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20231010

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...