-
Something wrong with this record ?
Right ventrolateral and left dorsolateral 10 Hz transcranial magnetic stimulation as an add-on treatment for bipolar I and II depression: a double-blind, randomised, three-arm, sham-controlled study
T. Novák, L. Kostýlková, M. Bareš, V. Renková, M. Hejzlar, J. Renka, S. Baumann, O. Laskov, M. Klírová
Language English Country England, Great Britain
Document type Journal Article, Randomized Controlled Trial
- MeSH
- Bipolar Disorder * therapy MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Double-Blind Method MeSH
- Combined Modality Therapy MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Psychiatric Status Rating Scales MeSH
- Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation * MeSH
- Treatment Outcome MeSH
- Check Tag
- Adult MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Randomized Controlled Trial MeSH
OBJECTIVES: Despite the clinical importance of bipolar depression (BDE), effective treatment options are still limited. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) has proven of moderate efficacy in major depression, but the evidence remains inconclusive for BDE. METHODS: A 4-week, double-blind, randomised, parallel-group, sham-controlled study (trial ID ISRCTN77188420) explored the benefits of 10 Hz MRI-guided right ventrolateral (RVL) rTMS and left dorsolateral (LDL) rTMS as add-on treatments for BDE. Outcome measures included changes in the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) score, self-assessment, response and remission rates, and side effects. RESULTS: Sixty patients were randomly assigned to study groups, and forty-six completed the double-blind phase. The mean change from baseline to Week 4 in MADRS was greater in both active groups compared to the sham, yet differences did not achieve significance (RVL vs sham: -4.50, 95%CI -10.63 to 1.64, p = 0.3; LDL vs sham: -4.07, 95%CI -10.24 to 2.10, p = 0.4). None of the other outcome measures yielded significant results. CONCLUSIONS: While not demonstrating the superiority of either 10 Hz rTMS over sham, with the limited sample size, we can not rule out a moderate yet clinically meaningful effect. Further well-powered studies are essential to elucidate the role of rTMS in managing BDE.
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc24013620
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20240905134135.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 240725s2024 enk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1080/15622975.2024.2357110 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)38785073
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a enk
- 100 1_
- $a Novák, Tomáš $u National Institute of Mental Health, Klecany, Czech Republic $u Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000191569654 $7 xx0079061
- 245 10
- $a Right ventrolateral and left dorsolateral 10 Hz transcranial magnetic stimulation as an add-on treatment for bipolar I and II depression: a double-blind, randomised, three-arm, sham-controlled study / $c T. Novák, L. Kostýlková, M. Bareš, V. Renková, M. Hejzlar, J. Renka, S. Baumann, O. Laskov, M. Klírová
- 520 9_
- $a OBJECTIVES: Despite the clinical importance of bipolar depression (BDE), effective treatment options are still limited. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) has proven of moderate efficacy in major depression, but the evidence remains inconclusive for BDE. METHODS: A 4-week, double-blind, randomised, parallel-group, sham-controlled study (trial ID ISRCTN77188420) explored the benefits of 10 Hz MRI-guided right ventrolateral (RVL) rTMS and left dorsolateral (LDL) rTMS as add-on treatments for BDE. Outcome measures included changes in the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) score, self-assessment, response and remission rates, and side effects. RESULTS: Sixty patients were randomly assigned to study groups, and forty-six completed the double-blind phase. The mean change from baseline to Week 4 in MADRS was greater in both active groups compared to the sham, yet differences did not achieve significance (RVL vs sham: -4.50, 95%CI -10.63 to 1.64, p = 0.3; LDL vs sham: -4.07, 95%CI -10.24 to 2.10, p = 0.4). None of the other outcome measures yielded significant results. CONCLUSIONS: While not demonstrating the superiority of either 10 Hz rTMS over sham, with the limited sample size, we can not rule out a moderate yet clinically meaningful effect. Further well-powered studies are essential to elucidate the role of rTMS in managing BDE.
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a dvojitá slepá metoda $7 D004311
- 650 12
- $a transkraniální magnetická stimulace $7 D050781
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 12
- $a bipolární porucha $x terapie $7 D001714
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a dospělí $7 D000328
- 650 _2
- $a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
- 650 _2
- $a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
- 650 _2
- $a kombinovaná terapie $7 D003131
- 650 _2
- $a psychiatrické posuzovací škály $7 D011569
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a randomizované kontrolované studie $7 D016449
- 700 1_
- $a Kostýlková, Lenka $u National Institute of Mental Health, Klecany, Czech Republic $u Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000288336937
- 700 1_
- $a Bareš, Martin $u National Institute of Mental Health, Klecany, Czech Republic $u Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000301816311 $7 xx0071354
- 700 1_
- $a Renková, Veronika $u National Institute of Mental Health, Klecany, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000338957070
- 700 1_
- $a Hejzlar, Martin $u National Institute of Mental Health, Klecany, Czech Republic $u Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000347856036 $7 xx0234960
- 700 1_
- $a Renka, Jiří $u National Institute of Mental Health, Klecany, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Baumann, Silvie $u National Institute of Mental Health, Klecany, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Laskov, Olga $u National Institute of Mental Health, Klecany, Czech Republic $u Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000228561024
- 700 1_
- $a Klírová, Monika $u National Institute of Mental Health, Klecany, Czech Republic $u Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000280929586 $7 xx0107681
- 773 0_
- $w MED00176986 $t The world journal of biological psychiatry $x 1814-1412 $g Roč. 25, č. 5 (2024), s. 304-316
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38785073 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20240725 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20240905134129 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 2143423 $s 1225486
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC-MEDLINE
- BMC __
- $a 2024 $b 25 $c 5 $d 304-316 $e 20240525 $i 1814-1412 $m The world journal of biological psychiatry $n World J Biol Psychiatry $x MED00176986
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20240725