-
Something wrong with this record ?
Changes of abdominal wall tension across various resistance exercises during maximal and submaximal loads in healthy adults: a cross-sectional study
R. Jurik, P. Stastny, D. Kolinger, T. Vetrovsky, J. Novak, A. Kobesova, M. Krzysztofik, A. Busch
Status not-indexed Language English Country England, Great Britain
Document type Journal Article
Grant support
484922
Grant Agency of Charles University
484922
Grant Agency of Charles University
484922
Grant Agency of Charles University
484922
Grant Agency of Charles University
NLK
BioMedCentral
from 2009-01-12
BioMedCentral Open Access
from 2009
Directory of Open Access Journals
from 2013
Free Medical Journals
from 2013
PubMed Central
from 2013
Europe PubMed Central
from 2013
ProQuest Central
from 2015-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
from 2013-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
from 2013-01-01
Nursing & Allied Health Database (ProQuest)
from 2015-01-01
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
from 2015-01-01
Health Management Database (ProQuest)
from 2015-01-01
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
from 2013
Springer Nature OA/Free Journals
from 2009-12-01
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
INTRODUCTION: Resistance exercises are effective for maintaining health and activating stabilizing muscles, as they trigger abdominal wall tension responses. This study compared the effects of multi-joint and single-joint, upper-body and lower-body exercises (Lat pulldown, Rows, Peck deck, Chest press, Biceps curls, Triceps extensions, French-Press, Step up, Hip abduction/adduction, Squat, Leg press, Romanian deadlift, Hamstring curls) performed at maximal and submaximal intensities. METHODS: This cross-sectional study included 12 men and 18 women (age:47.8 ± 5.9 years, height:174.8 ± 10.2 cm, weight: 77.7 ± 15.4 kg, BMI:25.3 ± 3.6), who wore a noninvasive sensor Ohmbelt to measure abdominal wall tension performing exercises at 15 repetition maximum (RM), 10RM, 5RM, and 1RM. Differences across exercises and sex were compared by Friedman test with Durbin-Conover post-hoc, and intensities were analyzed by Wilcoxon test. RESULTS: The study found significant differences (p < 0.05) in abdominal wall tension changes based on the type of exercise and training intensity. Multi-joint lower-body exercises, such as the Romanian deadlift, dumbbell front squat, and leg press, led to the greatest increases in abdominal tension in both sexes in comparison to single-joint upper-body exercises. Males had higher abdominal wall tension changes than females (p < 0.05) at 1RM, 5RM, and 10RM. However, no significant difference was found at 15RM, indicating that lower intensities produce similar abdominal wall tension changes in both sexes. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that multi-joint lower-body exercises were found to produce greatest abdominal wall tension increases, especially compared to single-joint upper-body exercises. The abdominal wall tension was higher in males than females due to higher loads, emphasizing the need for exercise-specific approaches.
Department of Health and Human Kinetics Ohio Wesleyan University Delaware USA
Faculty of Physical Education and Sport Charles University Prague 16252 Czechia
The Jerzy Kukuczka Academy of Physical Education and Sport Mikołowska 72A 40 065 Katowice Poland
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc25014425
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20250905141440.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 250701s2025 enk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1186/s13102-025-01161-y $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)40325422
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a enk
- 100 1_
- $a Jurik, Roman $u Department of Sport Games, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport, Charles University, José Martího 269, Prague, 16252, Czechia. roman.jurik@ftvs.cuni.cz
- 245 10
- $a Changes of abdominal wall tension across various resistance exercises during maximal and submaximal loads in healthy adults: a cross-sectional study / $c R. Jurik, P. Stastny, D. Kolinger, T. Vetrovsky, J. Novak, A. Kobesova, M. Krzysztofik, A. Busch
- 520 9_
- $a INTRODUCTION: Resistance exercises are effective for maintaining health and activating stabilizing muscles, as they trigger abdominal wall tension responses. This study compared the effects of multi-joint and single-joint, upper-body and lower-body exercises (Lat pulldown, Rows, Peck deck, Chest press, Biceps curls, Triceps extensions, French-Press, Step up, Hip abduction/adduction, Squat, Leg press, Romanian deadlift, Hamstring curls) performed at maximal and submaximal intensities. METHODS: This cross-sectional study included 12 men and 18 women (age:47.8 ± 5.9 years, height:174.8 ± 10.2 cm, weight: 77.7 ± 15.4 kg, BMI:25.3 ± 3.6), who wore a noninvasive sensor Ohmbelt to measure abdominal wall tension performing exercises at 15 repetition maximum (RM), 10RM, 5RM, and 1RM. Differences across exercises and sex were compared by Friedman test with Durbin-Conover post-hoc, and intensities were analyzed by Wilcoxon test. RESULTS: The study found significant differences (p < 0.05) in abdominal wall tension changes based on the type of exercise and training intensity. Multi-joint lower-body exercises, such as the Romanian deadlift, dumbbell front squat, and leg press, led to the greatest increases in abdominal tension in both sexes in comparison to single-joint upper-body exercises. Males had higher abdominal wall tension changes than females (p < 0.05) at 1RM, 5RM, and 10RM. However, no significant difference was found at 15RM, indicating that lower intensities produce similar abdominal wall tension changes in both sexes. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that multi-joint lower-body exercises were found to produce greatest abdominal wall tension increases, especially compared to single-joint upper-body exercises. The abdominal wall tension was higher in males than females due to higher loads, emphasizing the need for exercise-specific approaches.
- 590 __
- $a NEINDEXOVÁNO
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Stastny, Petr $u Department of Sport Games, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport, Charles University, José Martího 269, Prague, 16252, Czechia
- 700 1_
- $a Kolinger, Dominik $u Department of Sport Games, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport, Charles University, José Martího 269, Prague, 16252, Czechia
- 700 1_
- $a Vetrovsky, Tomas $u Faculty of Physical Education and Sport, Charles University, Prague, 16252, Czechia
- 700 1_
- $a Novak, Jakub $u Department of Rehabilitation and Sports Medicine, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and University Hospital Motol, Prague, Czechia
- 700 1_
- $a Kobesova, Alena $u Department of Rehabilitation and Sports Medicine, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and University Hospital Motol, Prague, Czechia
- 700 1_
- $a Krzysztofik, Michal $u The Jerzy Kukuczka Academy of Physical Education and Sport, Mikołowska 72A, 40-065, Katowice, Poland
- 700 1_
- $a Busch, Andrew $u Department of Health and Human Kinetics, Ohio Wesleyan University, Delaware, USA
- 773 0_
- $w MED00208616 $t BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation $x 2052-1847 $g Roč. 17, č. 1 (2025), s. 114
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40325422 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20250701 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20250905141427 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 2388079 $s 1251545
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC-PubMed-not-MEDLINE
- BMC __
- $a 2025 $b 17 $c 1 $d 114 $e 20250505 $i 2052-1847 $m BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation $n BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil $x MED00208616
- GRA __
- $a 484922 $p Grant Agency of Charles University
- GRA __
- $a 484922 $p Grant Agency of Charles University
- GRA __
- $a 484922 $p Grant Agency of Charles University
- GRA __
- $a 484922 $p Grant Agency of Charles University
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20250701