Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

Changes of abdominal wall tension across various resistance exercises during maximal and submaximal loads in healthy adults: a cross-sectional study

R. Jurik, P. Stastny, D. Kolinger, T. Vetrovsky, J. Novak, A. Kobesova, M. Krzysztofik, A. Busch

. 2025 ; 17 (1) : 114. [pub] 20250505

Status not-indexed Language English Country England, Great Britain

Document type Journal Article

Grant support
484922 Grant Agency of Charles University
484922 Grant Agency of Charles University
484922 Grant Agency of Charles University
484922 Grant Agency of Charles University

INTRODUCTION: Resistance exercises are effective for maintaining health and activating stabilizing muscles, as they trigger abdominal wall tension responses. This study compared the effects of multi-joint and single-joint, upper-body and lower-body exercises (Lat pulldown, Rows, Peck deck, Chest press, Biceps curls, Triceps extensions, French-Press, Step up, Hip abduction/adduction, Squat, Leg press, Romanian deadlift, Hamstring curls) performed at maximal and submaximal intensities. METHODS: This cross-sectional study included 12 men and 18 women (age:47.8 ± 5.9 years, height:174.8 ± 10.2 cm, weight: 77.7 ± 15.4 kg, BMI:25.3 ± 3.6), who wore a noninvasive sensor Ohmbelt to measure abdominal wall tension performing exercises at 15 repetition maximum (RM), 10RM, 5RM, and 1RM. Differences across exercises and sex were compared by Friedman test with Durbin-Conover post-hoc, and intensities were analyzed by Wilcoxon test. RESULTS: The study found significant differences (p < 0.05) in abdominal wall tension changes based on the type of exercise and training intensity. Multi-joint lower-body exercises, such as the Romanian deadlift, dumbbell front squat, and leg press, led to the greatest increases in abdominal tension in both sexes in comparison to single-joint upper-body exercises. Males had higher abdominal wall tension changes than females (p < 0.05) at 1RM, 5RM, and 10RM. However, no significant difference was found at 15RM, indicating that lower intensities produce similar abdominal wall tension changes in both sexes. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that multi-joint lower-body exercises were found to produce greatest abdominal wall tension increases, especially compared to single-joint upper-body exercises. The abdominal wall tension was higher in males than females due to higher loads, emphasizing the need for exercise-specific approaches.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc25014425
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20250905141440.0
007      
ta
008      
250701s2025 enk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1186/s13102-025-01161-y $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)40325422
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a enk
100    1_
$a Jurik, Roman $u Department of Sport Games, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport, Charles University, José Martího 269, Prague, 16252, Czechia. roman.jurik@ftvs.cuni.cz
245    10
$a Changes of abdominal wall tension across various resistance exercises during maximal and submaximal loads in healthy adults: a cross-sectional study / $c R. Jurik, P. Stastny, D. Kolinger, T. Vetrovsky, J. Novak, A. Kobesova, M. Krzysztofik, A. Busch
520    9_
$a INTRODUCTION: Resistance exercises are effective for maintaining health and activating stabilizing muscles, as they trigger abdominal wall tension responses. This study compared the effects of multi-joint and single-joint, upper-body and lower-body exercises (Lat pulldown, Rows, Peck deck, Chest press, Biceps curls, Triceps extensions, French-Press, Step up, Hip abduction/adduction, Squat, Leg press, Romanian deadlift, Hamstring curls) performed at maximal and submaximal intensities. METHODS: This cross-sectional study included 12 men and 18 women (age:47.8 ± 5.9 years, height:174.8 ± 10.2 cm, weight: 77.7 ± 15.4 kg, BMI:25.3 ± 3.6), who wore a noninvasive sensor Ohmbelt to measure abdominal wall tension performing exercises at 15 repetition maximum (RM), 10RM, 5RM, and 1RM. Differences across exercises and sex were compared by Friedman test with Durbin-Conover post-hoc, and intensities were analyzed by Wilcoxon test. RESULTS: The study found significant differences (p < 0.05) in abdominal wall tension changes based on the type of exercise and training intensity. Multi-joint lower-body exercises, such as the Romanian deadlift, dumbbell front squat, and leg press, led to the greatest increases in abdominal tension in both sexes in comparison to single-joint upper-body exercises. Males had higher abdominal wall tension changes than females (p < 0.05) at 1RM, 5RM, and 10RM. However, no significant difference was found at 15RM, indicating that lower intensities produce similar abdominal wall tension changes in both sexes. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that multi-joint lower-body exercises were found to produce greatest abdominal wall tension increases, especially compared to single-joint upper-body exercises. The abdominal wall tension was higher in males than females due to higher loads, emphasizing the need for exercise-specific approaches.
590    __
$a NEINDEXOVÁNO
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Stastny, Petr $u Department of Sport Games, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport, Charles University, José Martího 269, Prague, 16252, Czechia
700    1_
$a Kolinger, Dominik $u Department of Sport Games, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport, Charles University, José Martího 269, Prague, 16252, Czechia
700    1_
$a Vetrovsky, Tomas $u Faculty of Physical Education and Sport, Charles University, Prague, 16252, Czechia
700    1_
$a Novak, Jakub $u Department of Rehabilitation and Sports Medicine, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and University Hospital Motol, Prague, Czechia
700    1_
$a Kobesova, Alena $u Department of Rehabilitation and Sports Medicine, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and University Hospital Motol, Prague, Czechia
700    1_
$a Krzysztofik, Michal $u The Jerzy Kukuczka Academy of Physical Education and Sport, Mikołowska 72A, 40-065, Katowice, Poland
700    1_
$a Busch, Andrew $u Department of Health and Human Kinetics, Ohio Wesleyan University, Delaware, USA
773    0_
$w MED00208616 $t BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation $x 2052-1847 $g Roč. 17, č. 1 (2025), s. 114
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40325422 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
990    __
$a 20250701 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20250905141427 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 2388079 $s 1251545
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-PubMed-not-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2025 $b 17 $c 1 $d 114 $e 20250505 $i 2052-1847 $m BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation $n BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil $x MED00208616
GRA    __
$a 484922 $p Grant Agency of Charles University
GRA    __
$a 484922 $p Grant Agency of Charles University
GRA    __
$a 484922 $p Grant Agency of Charles University
GRA    __
$a 484922 $p Grant Agency of Charles University
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20250701

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...