Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

Multivariate analyses of Aurignacian and Gravettian personal ornaments support cultural continuity in the Early Upper Palaeolithic

F. d'Errico, J. Baker, D. Pereira, E. Álvarez-Fernández, M. Lázničková-Galetová, S. Rigaud

. 2025 ; 20 (6) : e0323148. [pub] 20250604

Language English Country United States

Document type Journal Article, Historical Article

Persistent link   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc25015370

Traditionally, lithic artefacts have served as the principal proxy for the definition of archaeological cultures in the Upper Paleolithic. However, the culture-historical framework in use, constructed unsystematically and shaped by regional research traditions, features a number of widely acknowledged drawbacks. Here we use personal ornaments to explore the nature of Early Upper Paleolithic cultural entities and establish to what extent they represent distinct or evolving cultural adaptations. We present an analysis of an updated georeferenced dataset composed of personal ornaments coming from two key successive Upper Paleolithic technocomplexes, the Aurignacian (42-34,000 years ago) and the Gravettian (34-24,000 years ago). Using a range of multivariate statistics, we demonstrate that, at both European and regional scales, people belonging to these technocomplexes wore similar personal ornaments, though fully-shaped personal ornaments appear more different between technocomplexes. We additionally show that the variability of the Aurignacian ornaments suggests more fragmented cultural clusters compared to the Gravettian, implying more extensive symbolic networks in the latter. Despite a long-standing consensus based on other archaeological proxies, which emphasises the dissimilarity between these cultural entities, our results demonstrate the complex nature of Upper Paleolithic cultures which are characterised by discontinuities in economic and technical systems and continuity in the culturalisation of the body.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc25015370
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20250731090933.0
007      
ta
008      
250708s2025 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1371/journal.pone.0323148 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)40465694
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a d'Errico, Francesco $u CNRS UMR 5199 De la Préhistoire à l'Actuel: Culture, Environnement, et Anthropologie (PACEA), Université Bordeaux, Talence, France $u SFF Centre for Early Sapiens Behaviour (SapienCE), University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway $1 https://orcid.org/0000000224223079 $7 utb2012679271
245    10
$a Multivariate analyses of Aurignacian and Gravettian personal ornaments support cultural continuity in the Early Upper Palaeolithic / $c F. d'Errico, J. Baker, D. Pereira, E. Álvarez-Fernández, M. Lázničková-Galetová, S. Rigaud
520    9_
$a Traditionally, lithic artefacts have served as the principal proxy for the definition of archaeological cultures in the Upper Paleolithic. However, the culture-historical framework in use, constructed unsystematically and shaped by regional research traditions, features a number of widely acknowledged drawbacks. Here we use personal ornaments to explore the nature of Early Upper Paleolithic cultural entities and establish to what extent they represent distinct or evolving cultural adaptations. We present an analysis of an updated georeferenced dataset composed of personal ornaments coming from two key successive Upper Paleolithic technocomplexes, the Aurignacian (42-34,000 years ago) and the Gravettian (34-24,000 years ago). Using a range of multivariate statistics, we demonstrate that, at both European and regional scales, people belonging to these technocomplexes wore similar personal ornaments, though fully-shaped personal ornaments appear more different between technocomplexes. We additionally show that the variability of the Aurignacian ornaments suggests more fragmented cultural clusters compared to the Gravettian, implying more extensive symbolic networks in the latter. Despite a long-standing consensus based on other archaeological proxies, which emphasises the dissimilarity between these cultural entities, our results demonstrate the complex nature of Upper Paleolithic cultures which are characterised by discontinuities in economic and technical systems and continuity in the culturalisation of the body.
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    12
$a archeologie $7 D001106
650    _2
$a multivariační analýza $7 D015999
650    12
$a kultura $7 D003469
650    12
$a kulturní evoluce $7 D003468
650    _2
$a dějiny starověku $7 D049690
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a historické články $7 D016456
700    1_
$a Baker, Jack $u CNRS UMR 5199 De la Préhistoire à l'Actuel: Culture, Environnement, et Anthropologie (PACEA), Université Bordeaux, Talence, France $1 https://orcid.org/0009000757974390
700    1_
$a Pereira, Daniel $u CNRS UMR 5199 De la Préhistoire à l'Actuel: Culture, Environnement, et Anthropologie (PACEA), Université Bordeaux, Talence, France $u BonesLab, Dipartimento di Beni Culturali, Università di Bologna, Ravenna, Italy $1 https://orcid.org/0000000333966402
700    1_
$a Álvarez-Fernández, Esteban $u GIR Prehusal, Dpto. de Prehistoria, Historia Antigua y Arqueología, Facultad de Geografía e Historia, Universidad de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain $1 https://orcid.org/0000000278953421
700    1_
$a Lázničková-Galetová, Martina $u Moravian Museum, Brno, Czech Republic $u UMR 7194 HNHP, Equipe NOMADE, CNRS/ Muséum national d'histoire naturelle (MNHN)/ UPVD Institut de Paléontologie Humaine, Paris, France
700    1_
$a Rigaud, Solange $u CNRS UMR 5199 De la Préhistoire à l'Actuel: Culture, Environnement, et Anthropologie (PACEA), Université Bordeaux, Talence, France
773    0_
$w MED00180950 $t PloS one $x 1932-6203 $g Roč. 20, č. 6 (2025), s. e0323148
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40465694 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
990    __
$a 20250708 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20250731090928 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 2366297 $s 1252495
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2025 $b 20 $c 6 $d e0323148 $e 20250604 $i 1932-6203 $m PloS one $n PLoS One $x MED00180950
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20250708
Back

Find record

Citation metrics

Archiving options