• Something wrong with this record ?

Evaluation of survival and mortality in pelvic exenteration for gynecologic malignancies: a systematic review, meta-analyses, and meta-regression study

V. Di Donato, E. Kontopantelis, E. De Angelis, RM. Arseni, G. Santangelo, D. Cibula, R. Angioli, F. Plotti, L. Muzii, G. Vizzielli, R. Tozzi, V. Chiantera, G. Caruso, A. Giannini, G. Scambia, NR. Abu-Rustum, P. Benedetti Panici, G. Bogani, Pelvic...

. 2025 ; 35 (6) : 101829. [pub] 20250411

Language English Country United States

Document type Journal Article, Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE: Pelvic exenteration is a radical surgery for advanced or recurrent pelvic tumors, requiring careful patient selection and a multi-disciplinary approach. Despite advancements, it remains high-risk, with limited data on outcomes. The present meta-analysis evaluates survival, mortality, and trends to clarify its role in gynecologic oncology. METHODS: A systematic search was conducted in January 2025 to identify studies on pelvic exenteration outcomes for gynecologic malignancies. Studies with at least 10 patients reporting 5-year overall survival or 30-day mortality were included. Data extracted included patient and surgical characteristics, and a scoring system based on study design, sample size, and center volume was used to include high-quality studies (score ≥3). Poisson regression models were used to analyze the associations between predictors and outcomes, with results expressed as incidence rate ratios and a 95% CI. RESULTS: A total of 46 studies involving 4417 patients met the inclusion criteria. Most patients underwent pelvic exenteration for cervical cancer (N = 3183). Positive pelvic and aortic nodal involvement were key predictors of reduced 5-year overall survival, decreasing by 3.9% and 5.9% per 1% increase in nodal positivity, respectively. Pelvic wall involvement also significantly reduced survival by 15.9%. The 30-day mortality rate was 5.1%, with sepsis (27.2%) being the leading cause of death. Peri-operative mortality decreased significantly over time, with each year of publication associated with a 2.6% decrease in incidence rate. However, pelvic sidewall involvement and total exenteration increased 30-day mortality by 11.5% and 0.7%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Pelvic exenteration remains a viable but high-risk option for select patients with advanced gynecologic malignancies. Pre-operative assessment and multi-disciplinary planning are essential for optimizing outcomes.

Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Friuli Centrale University Hospital Santa Maria della Misericordia Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology Udine Italy

Charles University General University Hospital Prague 1st Faculty of Medicine Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Prague Czech Republic

Fondazione G Pascale IRCCS National Cancer Institute Unit of Gynecologic Oncology Naples Italy

Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori Gynecological Oncology Unit Milan Italy

IRCCS European Institute of Oncology Division of Gynecologic Oncology Milan Italy

IRCCS Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna Rome Italy

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center Department of Surgery Gynecology Service New York NY USA

Padova University Hospital Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics Division of Women's and Children Health Padova Italy

Sapienza University of Rome Department of Experimental Medicine Rome Italy

Sapienza University of Rome Sant'Andrea Hospital Department of Surgical and Medical Sciences and Translational Medicine Unit of Gynecology Rome Italy

Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore Dipartimento Scienze della Vita e Sanità Pubblica Rome Italy

University of Manchester Division of Informatics Imaging and Data Sciences Manchester UK

University of Palermo Department of Gynecologic Oncology Palermo Italy

University of Rome Campus Bio Medico Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Rome Italy

University of Udine Department of Medicine Udine Italy

University Sapienza of Roma Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Rome Italy

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc25015434
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20250731090955.0
007      
ta
008      
250708s2025 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1016/j.ijgc.2025.101829 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)40373347
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Di Donato, Violante $u University Sapienza of Roma, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Rome, Italy. Electronic address: violante.didonato@uniroma1.it
245    10
$a Evaluation of survival and mortality in pelvic exenteration for gynecologic malignancies: a systematic review, meta-analyses, and meta-regression study / $c V. Di Donato, E. Kontopantelis, E. De Angelis, RM. Arseni, G. Santangelo, D. Cibula, R. Angioli, F. Plotti, L. Muzii, G. Vizzielli, R. Tozzi, V. Chiantera, G. Caruso, A. Giannini, G. Scambia, NR. Abu-Rustum, P. Benedetti Panici, G. Bogani, Pelvic Exenteration Study Group
520    9_
$a OBJECTIVE: Pelvic exenteration is a radical surgery for advanced or recurrent pelvic tumors, requiring careful patient selection and a multi-disciplinary approach. Despite advancements, it remains high-risk, with limited data on outcomes. The present meta-analysis evaluates survival, mortality, and trends to clarify its role in gynecologic oncology. METHODS: A systematic search was conducted in January 2025 to identify studies on pelvic exenteration outcomes for gynecologic malignancies. Studies with at least 10 patients reporting 5-year overall survival or 30-day mortality were included. Data extracted included patient and surgical characteristics, and a scoring system based on study design, sample size, and center volume was used to include high-quality studies (score ≥3). Poisson regression models were used to analyze the associations between predictors and outcomes, with results expressed as incidence rate ratios and a 95% CI. RESULTS: A total of 46 studies involving 4417 patients met the inclusion criteria. Most patients underwent pelvic exenteration for cervical cancer (N = 3183). Positive pelvic and aortic nodal involvement were key predictors of reduced 5-year overall survival, decreasing by 3.9% and 5.9% per 1% increase in nodal positivity, respectively. Pelvic wall involvement also significantly reduced survival by 15.9%. The 30-day mortality rate was 5.1%, with sepsis (27.2%) being the leading cause of death. Peri-operative mortality decreased significantly over time, with each year of publication associated with a 2.6% decrease in incidence rate. However, pelvic sidewall involvement and total exenteration increased 30-day mortality by 11.5% and 0.7%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Pelvic exenteration remains a viable but high-risk option for select patients with advanced gynecologic malignancies. Pre-operative assessment and multi-disciplinary planning are essential for optimizing outcomes.
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    12
$a exenterace pánve $x mortalita $x metody $7 D010385
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    12
$a nádory ženských pohlavních orgánů $x chirurgie $x mortalita $7 D005833
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a systematický přehled $7 D000078182
655    _2
$a metaanalýza $7 D017418
700    1_
$a Kontopantelis, Evangelos $u University of Manchester, Division of Informatics, Imaging and Data Sciences, Manchester, UK
700    1_
$a De Angelis, Emanuele $u University Sapienza of Roma, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Rome, Italy
700    1_
$a Arseni, Roberta Maria $u University Sapienza of Roma, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Rome, Italy
700    1_
$a Santangelo, Giusi $u University Sapienza of Roma, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Rome, Italy
700    1_
$a Cibula, David $u Charles University, General University Hospital in Prague, First Faculty of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Angioli, Roberto $u University of Rome, Campus Bio-Medico, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Rome, Italy
700    1_
$a Plotti, Francesco $u University of Rome, Campus Bio-Medico, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Rome, Italy
700    1_
$a Muzii, Ludovico $u University Sapienza of Roma, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Rome, Italy
700    1_
$a Vizzielli, Giuseppe $u Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Friuli Centrale, University Hospital, "Santa Maria della Misericordia", Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Udine, Italy; University of Udine, Department of Medicine, Udine, Italy
700    1_
$a Tozzi, Roberto $u Padova University Hospital, Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Division of Women's and Children Health, Padova, Italy
700    1_
$a Chiantera, Vito $u University of Palermo, Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Palermo, Italy; Fondazione "G. Pascale", IRCCS, National Cancer Institute, Unit of Gynecologic Oncology, Naples, Italy
700    1_
$a Caruso, Giuseppe $u IRCCS, European Institute of Oncology (IEO), Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Milan, Italy; Sapienza University of Rome, Department of Experimental Medicine, Rome, Italy
700    1_
$a Giannini, Andrea $u Sapienza University of Rome, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Department of Surgical and Medical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Unit of Gynecology, Rome, Italy
700    1_
$a Scambia, Giovanni $u IRCCS, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, Rome, Italy; Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Dipartimento Scienze della Vita e Sanità Pubblica, Rome, Italy
700    1_
$a Abu-Rustum, Nadeem R $u Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Department of Surgery, Gynecology Service, New York, NY, USA
700    1_
$a Benedetti Panici, Pierluigi $u University Sapienza of Roma, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Rome, Italy
700    1_
$a Bogani, Giorgio $u Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Gynecological Oncology Unit, Milan, Italy
710    2_
$a Pelvic Exenteration Study Group
773    0_
$w MED00009896 $t International journal of gynecological cancer $x 1525-1438 $g Roč. 35, č. 6 (2025), s. 101829
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40373347 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
990    __
$a 20250708 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20250731090950 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 2366329 $s 1252559
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2025 $b 35 $c 6 $d 101829 $e 20250411 $i 1525-1438 $m International journal of gynecological cancer $n Int J Gynecol Cancer $x MED00009896
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20250708

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...