OBJECTIVE: Verification of the possibility to predict diabetes in the neonates of mothers and fathers with Type 1 diabetes. DESIGN: Prospective clinical study. SETTING: Mother and Child Care Institute, Prague. Paediatric Clinic of the 2nd Faculty of Medicine at the Charles University, Prague. METHODS: In 31 neonates of mothers and fathers with Type 1 diabetes, the long-term and short-term risk of the occurrence of Type 1 diabetes was established. The genotypification of HLA, DQB1, HLA DQA1 and DRB1 *04 was carried out by using the PCR method to establish the long-term risk and according to the result of the examination, the examined child was included into one of the five categories of genetic risk. In all the monitored persons, the levels of antibodies against GAD65, IA-2 and IRA insulin were repeatedly identified by means of the methods, which are the markers of autoimmune insulitis and show the short-term risk of the occurrence of diabetes. The function-related examination of secretion of beta cells was carried out by using the intravenous glucose tolerance test (i.v. GTT) in children with significant titres of one or more antibodies. RESULTS: A very high risk of the occurrence of Type 1 diabetes was identified in 1 child with the genotype DQA1*03-DQB1*0201/DQA1*05-DQB1*0302 (3.23%); an increased risk was identified in 12 children (38.71%); a medium risk was identified in 11 children (35.48%); a relatively low risk was identified in 3 child (9,68%) and a low risk was identified in 4 children (12,90%). In 4 children (12.9%), a strongly protective alelle DQB1*0602 was found. In 4 children, positivity for one of the antibodies was identified. In 1 child of a diabetic father with an increased genetic risk, there was a decrease in the titre of antibodies in the case of repeated check and function-related examination of the insulin secretion (FPIR) will be carried out. In another child, disappearance of antibodies was identified when samples were taken for verification; function-related examination of insulin secretion produced normal results, and the child has remained without clinical manifestation of diabetes. In a third child, the positivity of the antibodies from the umbilical blood was only temporary and was probably caused by a passive transfer from the mother; now, when repeated checks were made, the antibodies have remained negative. In a fourth child, the parents refused further examinations after antibody positivity was observed; the child has been without clinical manifestation of diabetes up until now. CONCLUSION: This scheme for predicting diabetes by means of immunogenetic and immunological examination of risk individuals is a rational measure aimed at timely identification of autoimmune insulitis, which precedes the occurrence of Type 1 diabetes, and it should become a standard part of diabetological care.

Ustav pro péci o matku a díte Praha