Cell lineage of primary and secondary enamel knots
Language English Country United States Media print
Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Grant support
Wellcome Trust - United Kingdom
PubMed
15861403
DOI
10.1002/dvdy.20396
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- MeSH
- Cell Lineage * MeSH
- Carbocyanines MeSH
- Mice MeSH
- Tissue Culture Techniques MeSH
- Dental Enamel cytology embryology MeSH
- Tooth Germ cytology embryology MeSH
- Animals MeSH
- Check Tag
- Mice MeSH
- Animals MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
- Names of Substances
- 3,3'-dihexadecylindocarbocyanine MeSH Browser
- Carbocyanines MeSH
Recent research indicates that control of cusp morphology involves a signalling center at the heart of the developing tooth germ, known as the enamel knot. The primary enamel knot forms in both incisors and molar tooth germs at the cap stage of tooth development. Secondary and tertiary enamel knots only develop in molar tooth germs. These sit at the sites of future cusp tips from the early bell stage of tooth development. In studies describing the relationship between the primary and secondary enamel knots, it is often assumed that there is a cellular continuity between these structures, such that cells from the primary enamel knot physically contribute to the secondary enamel knots. We have devised a method whereby the developing tooth germ can be cultured in frontal slices with the enamel knot visible. The fate of the primary enamel knot cells can then be followed by 1,1', di-octadecyl-3,3,3',3',-tetramethylindo-carbocyanine perchlorate (DiI) labeling. Using this method, no cells of the primary enamel knot were seen to move toward the developing secondary enamel knots. Thus, although the primary and secondary enamel knots have a close molecular and functional relationship in molar development, they are not actually derived from the same cells.
References provided by Crossref.org