Massive allografts in tumour surgery
Language English Country Germany Media print-electronic
Document type Journal Article
PubMed
17013642
PubMed Central
PMC3172739
DOI
10.1007/s00264-006-0223-7
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Fractures, Bone MeSH
- Transplantation, Homologous adverse effects methods MeSH
- Leg Bones transplantation MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Bone Neoplasms surgery MeSH
- Follow-Up Studies MeSH
- Retrospective Studies MeSH
- Bone Transplantation * adverse effects methods MeSH
- Limb Salvage adverse effects methods MeSH
- Check Tag
- Adult MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
We offer our personal experience of the use of massive bone allografts after tumour resection. We demonstrate the long-term results from 71 patients (72 allografts) operated on between 1961 and 1990. The long-term survival rate in osteoarticular and intercalary grafts is around 60%. Fractures of the graft can be salvaged in most cases. Infection leads to the removal of the graft in almost all cases. Factors influencing the survival, remodelling and complications of the grafts are discussed. The regime of cryopreservation, fixation and loading of the graft influence these factors, as do the use of autologous bone chips around the allograft-host junction and the application of chemotherapy or radiation. Fracture of the graft can be salvaged in most cases, as opposed to infection which remains the most severe complication and can occur at any time. Even with the improvement of tumour endoprostheses, the use of allografts remains an option, especially in young patients.
Les auteurs rapportent leur expérience de l’utilisation des allogreffes massives après résection tumorale. Les résultats à long terme de 71 patients (73 allogreffes) opérés entre 1961 et 1990 sont rapportés avec un taux de survie dans les greffes articulaires et intercalaires voisin de 60%. Les fractures de greffes peuvent être rattrapées dans de nombreux cas, mais l’infection conduit à retirer la greffe dans la plupart des cas. Les facteurs influençant le remodelage et les complications des allogreffes sont discutés. Le régime de cryopréservation, la fixation et la remise en contrainte des greffes influencent ces facteurs ainsi que la disposition de lamelles d’autogreffe à la jonction hôte-allogreffe et l’aexistence de radio ou chimiothérapie. La rupture de la greffe peut être récupérée dans la plupart des cas, contrairement à l’infection qui demeure la complication la plus grave qui peut se produire à tout moment. Même avec le développement des prothèses massives pour tumeur l’utilisation des allogreffes reste une option interessante spécialement chez les patients jeunes.
See more in PubMed
Asada N, Tsuchiya H, Kitaoka K, Mori Y, Tomita K. Massive autoclaved allografts and autografts for limb salvage surgery: a 1–8 years follow up of 23 patients. Acta Orthop Scand. 1997;68:392–395. doi: 10.3109/17453679708996184. PubMed DOI
Beadel GP, McLaughlin CE, Wunder JS, Griffin AM, Ferguson PC, Bell RS. Outcome in two groups of patients with allograft-prosthetic reconstruction of pelvic tumor defects. Clin Orthop. 2005;438:30–35. PubMed
Enneking WF, Campanacci DA. Retrieved human allografts—a clinicopathological study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001;83-A:971–986. PubMed
Exner GU, Min K, Malinin TI, Schreiber A. Reconstruction of segmental bone defects using massive osseous and osteocartilaginous allograft. Schweiz Rundsch Med Prax. 1994;83:300–307. PubMed
Friedlaender GE. Bone allografts: the biological consequences of immunological events. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1991;73-A:1119–1122. PubMed
Kohler R, Lorge F, Brunat P, Mentigny M, Noyer D, Patricot L. Massive bone allografts in children. Int Orthop. 1990;14:249–253. doi: 10.1007/BF00178754. PubMed DOI
Koskinen EVS. Wide resection of primary tumors of bone and replacement with massive bone grafts. Clin Orthop. 1978;134:302–319. PubMed
Loty B, Tomeno B, Evrard J, Postel M. Infection in massive bone allografts sterilized by radiation. Int Orthop. 1994;18:164–171. doi: 10.1007/BF00192473. PubMed DOI
Mankin HJ, Fogelson FS, Thrasher AZ, Jaffer E. Massive resection and allograft replacement in the treatment of malignant bone tumors. N Engl J Med. 1976;294:1247–1255. PubMed
Mankin HJ, Hornicek FJ, Raskin KA. Infection in massive bone allografts. Clin Orthop. 2005;432:210–216. PubMed
Matejovsky Z. Bone and joint transplantation after tumor resection. In: Chao E, Ivins J, editors. Tumor prostheses for bone and joint reconstruction—the design and application. New York: Thieme-Stratton; 1983. pp. 47–53.
Moore DR, Halpern JL, Schwartz HS. Allograft ankle arthrodesis. A limb salvage technique for distal tibial tumors. Clin Orthop. 2005;440:213–221. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000176449.77149.81. PubMed DOI
Poitout DG. Future of bone allografts in massive bone resection for tumors. Presse Med 30. 1996;25:527–530. PubMed
Poitout D, Novakovitch G. Use of allografts in oncology and traumatology. Int Orthop. 1987;11:169–178. doi: 10.1007/BF00271443. PubMed DOI
Poitout D, Gaujoux G, Lempidakis M. Total or partial iliac reconstruction using allografts from bone bank. Int Orthop. 1990;14:111–119. doi: 10.1007/BF00180114. PubMed DOI
Julian M, Canadell J. Fractures of allografts used in limb preserving operations. Int Orthop. 1998;22:32–36. doi: 10.1007/s002640050203. PubMed DOI PMC
San Julian M, Leyes M, Mora G, Canadell J. Consolidation of massive bone allografts in limb preserving operations for bone tumors. Int Orthop. 1995;19:377–382. PubMed
Stryhal F, Matejovsky Z. Indication of homotransplatation in hip arthroplasty. In: Chapchal G, editor. Arthroplasty of the hip. Stuttgart: Thieme; 1973. pp. 56–61.