Effects of two types of restraint stress on spontaneous behavior of Sprague-Dawley and Lewis rats
Language English Country Poland Media print
Document type Comparative Study, Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
PubMed
17440228
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- MeSH
- Time Factors MeSH
- Behavior, Animal * MeSH
- Species Specificity MeSH
- Restraint, Physical adverse effects MeSH
- Rats MeSH
- Locomotion * MeSH
- Cold Temperature adverse effects MeSH
- Exploratory Behavior * MeSH
- Rats, Inbred Lew MeSH
- Rats, Sprague-Dawley MeSH
- Stress, Psychological etiology physiopathology MeSH
- Animals MeSH
- Check Tag
- Rats MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Animals MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
- Comparative Study MeSH
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the action of two types of stressors in Sprague-Dawley (S-D) and Lewis (LEW) rats differing in their hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis activity on locomotion and rearing in an open space. Exposure to restraint immobilization alone (IMO) or this immobilization combined with cold water (22 degrees C) immersion (IMO+C) lasted for 1 h and started 2 or 5 h before the test. To evaluate the acute and persisting effects of both stressors, four trials were performed in one-week intervals; rats were exposed to the stressors in trial 1 and 3. While in LEW rats both acute stressors produced reduction of locomotion and rearing in all stressed groups, S-D rats responded with a decrease of both parameters only after IMO+C presented 2 h before testing. Neither strain displayed a changed performance one week after the first stress exposure. One week after the second stress exposure rats of both strains exhibited a tendency to an increase of both parameters reaching the significance in several experimental groups. The findings indicate: a) the IMO+C produced stronger behavioral alteration than IMO alone; b) the behavioral responses to stressors were more pronounced in LEW compared to S-D strain; c) change from the reduction of activity to its increase may be interpreted as bi-directional manifestation of long-term effects of immobilization stress.