Efficacy of reovirus therapy combined with cyclophosphamide and gene-modified cell vaccines on tumors induced in mice by HPV16-transformed cells
Language English Country Greece Media print
Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
PubMed
18636165
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- MeSH
- Cyclophosphamide administration & dosage MeSH
- Neoplasms, Experimental therapy virology MeSH
- Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor genetics MeSH
- Genetic Therapy methods MeSH
- Interleukin-12 genetics MeSH
- Interleukin-2 genetics MeSH
- Combined Modality Therapy MeSH
- Human papillomavirus 16 MeSH
- Mice, Inbred C57BL MeSH
- Mice MeSH
- Oncolytic Virotherapy methods MeSH
- Antineoplastic Agents administration & dosage MeSH
- Cancer Vaccines administration & dosage MeSH
- Mammalian orthoreovirus 3 MeSH
- Animals MeSH
- Check Tag
- Mice MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Animals MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
- Names of Substances
- Cyclophosphamide MeSH
- Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor MeSH
- Interleukin-12 MeSH
- Interleukin-2 MeSH
- Antineoplastic Agents MeSH
- Cancer Vaccines MeSH
Oncolytic virotherapy is a novel approach to cancer treatment. In the present study we tested the ability of reovirus type 3, strain Dearing, to suppress the growth of tumors induced in mice by HPV16-transformed TC-1 cells. In vitro, these cells are highly susceptible to the virus. In repeated in vivo tests the intratumoral inoculation of the virus resulted in only a minor slow-down of tumor growth, never in a complete cure. The effect of the treatment was not enhanced by the simultaneous administration of non-oncogenic, genetically modified TC-1 cells expressing either IL-2, IL-12 or GM-CSF, and, in fact, the oncolytic effect of the virus was even less expressed in some instances. When cyclophosphamide was used in combination with the viral treatment, a synergistic effect resulting in tumor suppression was observed. In most instances the tumor regression was transitory, however, and was followed by tumor progression. The outcome of these experiments was dependent on the timing of the two treatments.