Effect of different factors on proliferation of antler cells, cultured in vitro

. 2011 Mar 28 ; 6 (3) : e18053. [epub] 20110328

Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium electronic

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/pmid21464927

Antlers as a potential model for bone growth and development have become an object of rising interest. To elucidate processes explaining how antler growth is regulated, in vitro cultures have been established. However, until now, there has been no standard method to cultivate antler cells and in vitro results are often opposite to those reported in vivo. In addition, many factors which are often not taken into account under in vitro conditions may play an important role in the development of antler cells. In this study we investigated the effects of the antler growth stage, the male individuality, passaged versus primary cultures and the effect of foetal calf serum concentrations on proliferative potential of mixed antler cell cultures in vitro, derived from regenerating antlers of red deer males (Cervus elaphus). The proliferation potential of antler cells was measured by incorporation of (3)H thymidine. Our results demonstrate that there is no significant effect of the antler growth stage, whereas male individuality and all other examined factors significantly affected antler cell proliferation. Furthermore, our results suggest that primary cultures may better represent in vivo conditions and processes occurring in regenerating antlers. In conclusion, before all main factors affecting antler cell proliferation in vitro will be satisfactorily investigated, results of in vitro studies focused on hormonal regulation of antler growth should be taken with extreme caution.

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Price J, Faucheux C, Allen S. Deer antlers as a model of mammalian regeneration. Curr Top Dev Biol. 2005;67:1–48. PubMed

Muir P, Sykes A, Barrell G. Growth and mineralisation of antlers in red deer (Cervus elaphus). New Zeal J Agr Res. 1987;30:305–315.

Rolf HJ, Kierdorf U, Kierdorf H, Schulz J, Seymour N, et al. Localization and characterization of STRO-1 cells in the deer pedicle and regenerating antler. PloS One 3: e2064. 2008;5 Available: http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0002064. Accessed 2008 May. PubMed DOI PMC

Li C, Littlejohn RP, Suttie JM. Effects of insulin-like growth factor 1 and testosterone on the proliferation of antlerogenic cells in vitro. J Exp Zool. 1999;284:82–90. PubMed

Li C, Wang W, Manley T, Suttie JM. No direct mitogenic effect of sex hormones on antlerogenic cells detected in vitro. Gen Comp Endocrinol. 2001;124:75–81. PubMed

Bartoš L, Schams D, Kierdorf U, Fischer K, Bubenik GA, et al. Cyproterone acetate reduced antler growth in surgically castrated fallow deer. J Endocrinol. 2000;164:87–95. PubMed

Bartoš L, Bubenik GA, Tománek M. The role of adrenal androgens in antler growth of castrated fallow deer (Dama dama): Possible stimulation of adrenal secretion of testosterone by stress. In: Suttie JM, Haines SR, Li C, editors. Advances in Antler Science and Product Technology. AgResearch, Invermay Agricultural Centre; 2004. pp. 45–53.

Bartoš L, Schams D, Bubenik GA. Testosterone, but not IGF-1, LH, prolactin or cortisol, may serve as antler-stimulating hormone in red deer stags (Cervus elaphus). Bone. 2009;44:691–698. PubMed

Sadighi M, Haines SR, Skottner A, Harris AJ, Suttie M. Effects of insulin-like growth factor-I (lGF-1) and ICF-II on the growth of antler cells in vitro. J Endocrinol. 1994;143:461–469. PubMed

Sadighi M, Li C, Littlejohn RP, Suttie JM. Effects of testosterone either alone or with IGF-I on growth of cells derived from the proliferation zone of regenerating antlers in vitro. Growth Horm IGF Res. 2001;11:240–246. PubMed

Rolf HJ, Wiese KG, Siggelkow H, Schliephake H, Bubenik GA. In vitro-studies with antler bone cells: Structure forming capacity, osteocalcin production and influence of sex steroids. Osteology. 2006;15:245–257.

Lutz MB, Rössner S. Factors influencing the generation of murine dendritic cells from bone marrow: the special role of fetal calf serum. Immunobiology. 2007;212:855–862. PubMed

Rhodes NP, Srivastava JK, Smith RF, Longinotti C. Heterogeneity in proliferative potential of ovine mesenchymal stem cell colonies. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2004;15:397–402. PubMed

Ciba P, Sturmheit TM, Petschnik a E, Kruse C, Danner S. In vitro cultures of human pancreatic stem cells: gene and protein expression of designated markers varies with passage. Ann Anat. 2009;191:94–103. PubMed

Thibeault S, Li W, Gray SD, Chen Z. Instablity of extracellular matrix gene expression in primary cell culture of fibroblasts from human vocal fold lamina propria and tracheal scar. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2002;111:8–14. PubMed

Uchida K, Urabe K, Naruse K, Ujihira M, Mabuchi K, et al. Comparison of the cytokine-induced migratory response between primary and subcultured populations of rat mesenchymal bone marrow cells. J Orthop Sci. 2007;12:484–492. PubMed

Patel M, Smith AJ, Sloan AJ, Smith G, Cooper PR. Phenotype and behaviour of dental pulp cells during expansion culture. Arch Oral Biol. 2009;54:898–908. PubMed

Itaya T, Kagami H, Okada K, Yamawaki a, Narita Y, et al. Characteristic changes of periodontal ligament-derived cells during passage. J Periodontal Res. 2009;44:425–433. PubMed

Pradel W, Mai R, Gedrange T, Lauer G. Cell passage and composition of culture medium effects proliferation and differentiation of human osteoblast-like cells from facial bone. J Physiol Pharmacol. 2008;59(Suppl 5):47–58. PubMed

Solchaga LA, Johnstone B, Yoo JU, Goldberg VM, Caplan AI. High variability in rabbit bone marrow-derived mesenchymal cell preparations. Cell Transplant. 1999;8:511–519. PubMed

Werren C, Diaz-Romero J, Brehm W, Nesic D. Influence of culture conditions on expansion and re-differentiation of chondrocytes from horses of different ages. Pferdeheilkunde. 2008;24:193–202.

Kužmová E, Kotrba R, Rolf HJ, Bartoš L, Wiese KG, et al. Anim Prod Sci. In press; 2011. Factors affecting the number of STRO-1+ stem cells derived from regenerating antler and pedicle cells of red and fallow deer.

Faucheux C, Nesbitt S, Horton M, Price JS. Cells in regenerating deer antler cartilage provide a microenvironment that supports osteoclast differentiation. J Exp Biol. 2001;204:443–455. PubMed

Bartoš L, Losos S. Response of antler growth to changing rank of fallow deer buck during the velvet period. Can J Zool. 1997;75:1934–1939.

Bartoš L, Perner V, Prochazka B. On the relationship between social rank during the velvet period and antler parameters in a growing red deer stag. Acta Theriol. 1987;32:403–412.

Ciapetti G, Ambrosio L, Marletta G, Baldini N, Giunti a. Human bone marrow stromal cells: In vitro expansion and differentiation for bone engineering. Biomaterials. 2006;27:6150–6160. PubMed

Riekstina U, Muceniece R, Cakstina I, Muiznieks I, Ancans J. Characterization of human skin-derived mesenchymal stem cell proliferation rate in different growth conditions. Cytotechnology. 2008;58:153–162. PubMed PMC

Matich J, Basford Nicholson LF, Barling PM. Mitotic activity in the growing red deer antler. Cell Biol Int. 2003;27:625–632. PubMed

Colitti M, Allen SP, Price JS. Programmed cell death in the regenerating deer antler. J Anat. 2005;207:339–351. PubMed PMC

Allen S, Maden M, Price J. A role for retinoic acid in regulating the regeneration of deer antlers. Dev Biol. 2002;251:409–423. PubMed

Vacková I, Engelová M, Marinov I, Tománek M. Cell cycle synchronization of porcine granulosa cells in G1 stage with mimosine. Anim Reprod Sci. 2003;77:235–245. PubMed

Li C, Mackintosh CG, Martin SK, Clark DE. Identification of key tissue type for antler regeneration through pedicle periosteum deletion. Cell Tissue Res. 2007;328:65–75. PubMed

Li C, Suttie J. Deer antlerogenic periosteum: a piece of postnatally retained embryonic tissue? Anat Embryol. 2001;204:375–388. PubMed

Kierdorf U, Li C, Price JS. Improbable appendages: Deer antler renewal as a unique case of mammalian regeneration. Sem Cell Dev Biol. 2009;20:535–542. PubMed

Kierdorf U, Kierdorf H, Szuwart T. Deer Antler Regeneration: Cells, Concepts, and Controversies. J Morphol. 2007;738:726–738. PubMed

Cegielski M, Calkosinski I, Dziegiel P, Gebarowski T, Podhorska-Okolow M, et al. Search for stem cells in the growing antler stag (Cervus elaphus). Bull Vet Inst Pulawy. 2006;50:247–251.

Le Blanc K, Pittenger M. Mesenchymal stem cells: progress toward promise. Cytotherapy. 2005;7:36–45. PubMed

Beales MP, Funderburgh JL, Jester JV, Hassell JR. Proteoglycan synthesis by bovine keratocytes and corneal fibroblasts: maintenance of the keratocyte phenotype in culture. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1999;40:1658–1663. PubMed

Berg DK, Li C, Asher G, Wells DN, Oback B. Red deer cloned from antler stem cells and their differentiated progeny. Biol Reprod. 2007;77:384–394. PubMed

Pochampally RR, Smith JR, Ylostalo J, Prockop DJ. Serum deprivation of human marrow stromal cells (hMSCs) selects for a subpopulation of early progenitor cells with enhanced expression of OCT-4 and other embryonic genes. Blood. 2004;103:1647–1652. PubMed

Yokoyama M, Miwa H, Maeda S, Wakitani S, Takagi M. Influence of fetal calf serum on differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells to chondrocytes during expansion. Journal of bioscience and bioengineering. 2008;106:46–50. PubMed

Price JS, Allen S, Faucheux C, Althnaian T, Mount JG. Deer antlers: a zoological curiosity or the key to understanding organ regeneration in mammals? J Anat. 2005;207:603–618. PubMed PMC

Hiorns LR, Bradshaw TD, Skelton L a, Yu Q, Kelland LR, et al. Variation in RNA expression and genomic DNA content acquired during cell culture. Br J Cancer. 2004;90:476–482. PubMed PMC

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...