• This record comes from PubMed

A survey on distribution and toxigenicity of Aspergillus flavus from indoor and outdoor hospital environments

. 2011 Nov ; 56 (6) : 527-34. [epub] 20111115

Language English Country United States Media print-electronic

Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

In the present study, genetic diversity and mycotoxin profiles of Aspergillus flavus isolated from air (indoors and outdoors), levels (surfaces), and soils of five hospitals in Southwest Iran were examined. From a total of 146 Aspergillus colonies, 63 isolates were finally identified as A. flavus by a combination of colony morphology, microscopic criteria, and mycotoxin profiles. No Aspergillus parasiticus was isolated from examined samples. Chromatographic analyses of A. flavus isolates cultured on yeast extract-sucrose broth by tip culture method showed that approximately 10% and 45% of the isolates were able to produce aflatoxin B(1) (AFB(1)) and cyclopiazonic acid (CPA), respectively. Around 40% of the isolates produced sclerotia on Czapek-Dox agar. The isolates were classified into four chemotypes based on the ability to produce AF and CPA that majority of them (55.5%) belonged to chemotype IV comprising non-mycotoxigenic isolates. Random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) profiles generated by a combination of four selected primers were used to assess genetic relatedness of 16 selected toxigenic and non-toxigenic isolates. The resulting dendrogram demonstrated the formation of two separate clusters for the A. flavus comprised both mycotoxigenic and non-toxigenic isolates in a random distribution. The obtained results in this study showed that RAPD profiling is a promising and efficient tool to determine intra-specific genetic variation among A. flavus populations from hospital environments. A. flavus isolates, either toxigenic or non-toxigenic, should be considered as potential threats for hospitalized patients due to their obvious role in the etiology of nosocomial aspergillosis.

See more in PubMed

Clin Microbiol Infect. 2003 Dec;9(12):1191-202 PubMed

Clin Microbiol Infect. 2001;7 Suppl 2:38-45 PubMed

Folia Biol (Praha). 1999;45(3):97-9 PubMed

Mycopathologia. 2006 Mar;161(3):183-92 PubMed

Appl Environ Microbiol. 1999 Apr;65(4):1444-9 PubMed

Toxicol Ind Health. 2009 Oct-Nov;25(9-10):657-67 PubMed

Mycopathologia. 2009 Nov;168(5):257-68 PubMed

Int J Food Microbiol. 2007 Feb 15;113(3):330-8 PubMed

Appl Environ Microbiol. 1996 Aug;62(8):2947-52 PubMed

J Hosp Infect. 2006 Jul;63(3):246-54 PubMed

Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2007 Sep;102(6):687-92 PubMed

J Hosp Infect. 2002 Nov;52(3):185-91 PubMed

Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1999 Jul;34(3):221-7 PubMed

Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2007 Sep;71(9):2329-32 PubMed

J Gen Microbiol. 1963 Sep;32:397-402 PubMed

J Hosp Infect. 2004 Sep;58(1):59-62 PubMed

Am J Infect Control. 2009 Apr;37(3):189-94 PubMed

Appl Environ Microbiol. 1999 May;65(5):2264-6 PubMed

Mycopathologia. 2002;153(1):41-8 PubMed

Sci Total Environ. 2010 Sep 15;408(20):4285-95 PubMed

J Clin Microbiol. 2001 Sep;39(9):3360-1 PubMed

Mycologia. 2005 Mar-Apr;97(2):425-32 PubMed

Appl Environ Microbiol. 1983 Dec;46(6):1435-7 PubMed

Genet Mol Res. 2008 Aug 05;7(3):706-17 PubMed

Appl Environ Microbiol. 1988 Aug;54(8):2096-100 PubMed

Rev Iberoam Micol. 2001 Dec;18(4):156-62 PubMed

Fungal Genet Biol. 2003 Jul;39(2):103-17 PubMed

J Clin Microbiol. 1998 Jun;36(6):1494-500 PubMed

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...