• This record comes from PubMed

Occupational skin diseases in Czech healthcare workers from 1997 to 2009

. 2013 Apr ; 86 (3) : 289-94. [epub] 20120331

Language English Country Germany Media print-electronic

Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

BACKGROUND: The healthcare sector ranked in second place among economic sectors in the Czech Republic, with about 11.4 % of all occupational diseases in 2009. Skin diseases constituted about 20 % of all occupational diseases. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to analyze the causes and trends in allergic and irritant-induced skin diseases in the healthcare sector. METHODS: The data concerning occupational skin diseases (Chapter IV of the Czech List of Occupational Diseases, non-infectious skin illnesses) in the healthcare sector were analyzed from the Czech National Registry of Occupational Diseases from 1997 until 2009. The trends in the total counts and most frequent causes were evaluated. RESULTS: During the past 13 years, a total of 545 skin diseases were acknowledged in healthcare workers. Allergic contact dermatitis was diagnosed in 464 (85 %), irritant contact dermatitis in 71 (13 %) and contact urticaria in 10 subjects (2 %). Ninety-five percent of the patients were females. The overall incidence in individual years varied between 1.0 and 2.9 cases per 10,000 full-time employees per year. Disinfectants were the most frequent chemical agents causing more than one third of all allergic skin diseases (38 %), followed by rubber components (32 %) and cleaning agents (10 %). CONCLUSION: A general downward trend of diagnosed cases of occupational skin diseases in heath care workers in the Czech Republic over the past 13 years was demonstrated.

See more in PubMed

Int Dent J. 2000 Feb;50(1):36-40 PubMed

Australas J Dermatol. 2000 May;41(2):63-9; quiz 70-1 PubMed

Br J Dermatol. 2001 Feb;144(2):347-50 PubMed

Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 1998;11(4):349-58 PubMed

Dermatology. 2000;201(2):127-31 PubMed

Cent Eur J Public Health. 2000 Nov;8(4):210-2 PubMed

Contact Dermatitis. 2004 Feb;50(2):77-82 PubMed

Contact Dermatitis. 2002 Feb;46(2):101-7 PubMed

Acta Derm Venereol. 1998 Sep;78(5):358-63 PubMed

J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2007 Jul;5(7):576-81 PubMed

Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2003 Jun;76(5):331-8 PubMed

Br J Dermatol. 2001 Sep;145(3):453-62 PubMed

Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2003 Jun;76(5):325-30 PubMed

Am J Contact Dermat. 2001 Jun;12(2):88-92 PubMed

Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 1999 Nov;72(8):496-506 PubMed

Contact Dermatitis. 2000 Oct;43(4):192-9 PubMed

Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 1997;69(2):79-82 PubMed

Contact Dermatitis. 2004 Apr;50(4):222-4 PubMed

Am J Clin Dermatol. 2002;3(4):283-9 PubMed

Ind Health. 2007 Oct;45(5):611-21 PubMed

Contact Dermatitis. 2000 Sep;43(3):150-6 PubMed

Am J Contact Dermat. 1998 Mar;9(1):29-33 PubMed

Contact Dermatitis. 2001 Aug;45(2):89-94 PubMed

Hautarzt. 1994 Dec;45(12):834-44 PubMed

Contact Dermatitis. 1996 Feb;34(2):125-33 PubMed

Contact Dermatitis. 2005 Sep;53(3):162-6 PubMed

Allergy. 2001 Oct;56(10):937-43 PubMed

Contact Dermatitis. 2002 Apr;46(4):207-10 PubMed

Contact Dermatitis. 2008 May;58(5):285-90 PubMed

Find record

Citation metrics

Logged in users only

Archiving options

Loading data ...