Oxygen tolerance in anaerobic pathogenic bacteria
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
- MeSH
- anaerobióza MeSH
- anaerobní bakterie metabolismus MeSH
- Bacteroides fragilis metabolismus MeSH
- Clostridioides difficile metabolismus MeSH
- Clostridium perfringens metabolismus MeSH
- klostridiové infekce mikrobiologie MeSH
- kyslík metabolismus MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- Názvy látek
- kyslík MeSH
A prerequisite for successful identification of anaerobic pathogenic bacteria from samples of clinical material is the method of cultivation. Currently, several methods of cultivation in anaerobic environment are used: cultivation in anaerobic box, anaerobic jar, and in nonrecurring cultivation system. Here, we determined the suitability of the above methods of cultivation using the estimation of the growth (diameters of colony size) of commonly isolated anaerobic pathogens (Bacteroides fragilis, Clostridium difficile, and Clostridium perfringens). The tested bacterial strains were exposed to atmospheric oxygen for various time periods and then they were cultivated using different anaerobic cultivation systems. Maximum growth differed, depending on the type of cultivation and the strain used. Thus, largest zone diameters, in the majority of measurements, were achieved in the anaerobic box. However, nonrecurring cultivation system seemed better in several cases; this applied to the cultivation of C. perfringens after 15, 30, and 60 min exposure to atmospheric oxygen as well as the cultivation of B. fragilis after 30 and 60 min of oxygen exposure. The cultivation in anaerobic box was the most convenient method for growth of C. difficile. In almost all cases, higher growth was observed in nonrecurring cultivation system than in the system of anaerobic jar. On the other hand, no significant differences were observed among these anaerobic cultivation systems which confirmed their applicability (taking into account some individual features concerning the optimization of cultivations) for identification of pathogenic anaerobes.
Zobrazit více v PubMed
J Clin Microbiol. 1997 Aug;35(8):2170-3 PubMed
Folia Microbiol (Praha). 2009;54(4):353-8 PubMed
Korean J Intern Med. 2009 Mar;24(1):13-8 PubMed
Anaerobe. 1999 Feb;5(1):5-9 PubMed
Med Princ Pract. 2003 Apr-Jun;12(2):81-6 PubMed
J Clin Microbiol. 1982 Dec;16(6):1152-4 PubMed
J Clin Microbiol. 1996 Jul;34(7):1646-8 PubMed
J Clin Microbiol. 1995 Sep;33(9):2388-91 PubMed
Clin Lab Med. 1995 Jun;15(2):333-64 PubMed
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2004 Apr;23(4):310-6 PubMed
Microbiology (Reading). 2004 Jun;150(Pt 6):1649-1659 PubMed
Am J Clin Nutr. 1977 Nov;30(11):1762-9 PubMed
Clin Infect Dis. 1997 Sep;25 Suppl 2:S137-8 PubMed