Analysis of internal astigmatism and higher order aberrations in eyes implanted with a new diffractive multifocal toric intraocular lens

. 2013 Jan ; 251 (1) : 341-8. [epub] 20120517

Jazyk angličtina Země Německo Médium print-electronic

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/pmid22588290

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the intraocular lens (IOL) position by analyzing the postoperative axis of internal astigmatism as well as the higher-order aberration (HOA) profile after cataract surgery following the implantation of a diffractive multifocal toric IOL METHODS: Prospective study including 51 eyes with corneal astigmatism of 1.25D or higher of 29 patients with ages ranging between 20 and 61 years old. All cases underwent uneventful cataract surgery with implantation of the AT LISA 909 M toric IOL (Zeiss). Visual, refractive and corneal topograpy changes were evaluated during a 12-month follow-up. In addition, the axis of internal astigmatism as well as ocular, corneal, and internal HOA (5-mm pupil) were evaluated postoperatively by means of an integrated aberrometer (OPD Scan II, Nidek). RESULTS: A significant improvement in uncorrected distance and near visual acuities (p < 0.01) was found, which was consistent with a significant correction of manifest astigmatism (p < 0.01). No significant changes were observed in corneal astigmatism (p = 0.32). With regard to IOL alignment, the difference between the axes of postoperative internal and preoperative corneal astigmatisms was close to perpendicularity (12 months, 87.16° ± 7.14), without significant changes during the first 6 months (p ≥ 0.46). Small but significant changes were detected afterwards (p = 0.01). Additionally, this angular difference correlated with the postoperative magnitude of manifest cylinder (r = 0.31, p = 0.03). Minimal contribution of intraocular optics to the global magnitude of HOA was observed. CONCLUSIONS: The diffractive multifocal toric IOL evaluated is able to provide a predictable astigmatic correction with apparent excellent levels of optical quality during the first year after implantation.

Zobrazit více v PubMed

J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011 Jun;37(6):1038-49 PubMed

J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010 Feb;36(2):222-9 PubMed

J Refract Surg. 2009 Jan;25(1 Suppl):S104-9 PubMed

J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008 Apr;34(4):601-7 PubMed

J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008 Sep;34(9):1483-8 PubMed

J Refract Surg. 2008 Mar;24(3):280-6 PubMed

J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010 Jan;36(1):44-52 PubMed

J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011 Jul;37(7):1217-29 PubMed

J Refract Surg. 2012 Feb;28(2):93-9 PubMed

J Refract Surg. 2011 Aug;27(8):570-81 PubMed

J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009 Mar;35(3):451-8 PubMed

J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008 Nov;34(11):1842-7 PubMed

Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol. 2010 Jan;17(1):94-9 PubMed

J Refract Surg. 2009 Jan;25(1 Suppl):S110-5 PubMed

J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007 May;33(5):800-3 PubMed

J Refract Surg. 2011 Sep;27(9):648-57 PubMed

J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006 Sep;32(9):1492-8 PubMed

J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005 Mar;31(3):557-61 PubMed

J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 2006 Mar;23(3):544-9 PubMed

J Cataract Refract Surg. 2000 Jul;26(7):1022-7 PubMed

J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003 May;29(5):935-40 PubMed

J Cataract Refract Surg. 2000 Oct;26(10):1496-504 PubMed

J Cataract Refract Surg. 2002 Feb;28(2):295-301 PubMed

Ophthalmology. 2010 Nov;117(11):2104-11 PubMed

J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009 Mar;35(3):413-8 PubMed

J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011 Feb;37(2):251-7 PubMed

J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010 May;36(5):778-82 PubMed

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

    Možnosti archivace