Valuation of mortality risk attributable to climate change: investigating the effect of survey administration modes on a VSL
Jazyk angličtina Země Švýcarsko Médium electronic
Typ dokumentu hodnotící studie, časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
PubMed
23249861
PubMed Central
PMC3546789
DOI
10.3390/ijerph9124760
PII: ijerph9124760
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- chování snižující riziko MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- hodnota života ekonomika MeSH
- internet MeSH
- klimatické změny ekonomika MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- postoj MeSH
- předčasná smrt * MeSH
- průzkumy a dotazníky normy MeSH
- sběr dat metody MeSH
- výběrové chování MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- hodnotící studie MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- Geografické názvy
- Česká republika MeSH
The health impact attributable to climate change has been identified as one of the priority areas for impact assessment. The main goal of this paper is to estimate the monetary value of one key health effect, which is premature mortality. Specifically, our goal is to derive the value of a statistical life from people's willingness to pay for avoiding the risk of dying in one post-transition country in Europe, i.e., the Czech Republic. We carried out a series of conjoint choice experiments in order to value mortality risk reductions. We found the responses to the conjoint choice questions to be reasonable and consistent with the economic paradigm. The VSL is about EUR 2.4 million, and our estimate is comparable with the value of preventing a fatality as used in one of the integrated assessment models. To investigate whether carrying out the survey through the internet may violate the welfare estimate, we administered our questionnaire to two independent samples of respondents using two different modes of survey administration. The results show that the VSLs for the two groups of respondents are €2.25 and €2.55 million, and these figures are statistically indistinguishable. However, the key parameters of indirect utility between the two modes of survey administration are statistically different when specific subgroups of population, such as older respondents, are concerned. Based on this evidence, we conclude that properly designed and administered on-line surveys are a reliable method for administering questionnaires, even when the latter are cognitively challenging. However, attention should be paid to sampling and choice regarding the mode of survey administration if the preference of specific segments of the population is elicited.
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Watkiss P., Horrocks L., Pye S., Searl A., Hunt A. Impacts of Climate Change in Human Health in Europe. PESETA—Human Health Study. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities; Luxembourg, Luxembourg: 2009.
Campbell-Lendrum D., Woodruff R. In: Climate Change: Quantifying the Health Impact at National and Local Levels. Prüss-Üstün A., Corvalán C., editors. World Health Organization; Geneva, Switzerland: 2007.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Working Group II. Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaption and Vulnerability. Cambridge University Press; Cambridge, UK: 2007. [(accessed on 28 March 2010)]. Available online: www.ipcc.ch/publications_and_data/ar4/wg2/en/contents.html.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Costs of Inaction on Key Environmental Challenges. OECD Publishing; Paris, France: 2008.
Trærup S.L.M., Ortiz R.A., Markandya A. The costs of climate change: A study of Cholera in Tanzania. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2011;8:4386–4405. doi: 10.3390/ijerph8124386. PubMed DOI PMC
Desaigues B., Ami D., Bartczak A., Braun-Kohlová M., Chilton S., Czajkowski M., Farreras V., Hunt A., Hutchison M., Jeanrenaud C., Kaderjak P., Máca V., Markiewicz O., Markowska A., Metcalf H., Navrud S., Nielsen J.S., Ortiz R., Pellegrini S., Rabl A., Riera R., Scasny M., Stoeckel M.-E., Szántó R., Urban J. Economic valuation of air pollution mortality: A 9-country contingent valuation survey of value of a life year (VOLY) Ecol. Indic. 2011;11:902–910. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2010.12.006. DOI
Berrens R.P., Bohara A.K., Jenkins-Smith H.C., Silva C.L., Weimer D.L. Information and effort in contingent valuation surveys: Application to global climate change using national internet samples. J. Environ. Econ. Manage. 2004;47:331–363. doi: 10.1016/S0095-0696(03)00094-9. DOI
Alberini A., Cropper M., Krupnick A., Simon N.B. Does the value of a statistical life vary with age and health status? Evidence from the US and Canada. J. Environ. Econ. Manage. 2004;48:769–792. doi: 10.1016/j.jeem.2003.10.005. DOI
Alberini A., Cropper M., Krupnick A., Simon N.B. Willingness to pay for mortality risk reductions: Does latency matter? J. Risk Uncertainty. 2006;32:231–245. doi: 10.1007/s11166-006-9521-0. DOI
Adamowicz W., Dupont D., Krupnick A., Zhang J. Valuation of cancer and microbial disease risk reductions in municipal drinking water: An analysis of risk context using multiple valuation methods. J. Environ. Econ. Manage. 2001;61:213–226.
Bosworth R., Cameron T.A., DeShazo J.R. Demand for environmental policies to improve health: Evaluating community-level policy scenarios. J. Environ. Econ. Manage. 2009;57:293–308. doi: 10.1016/j.jeem.2008.07.009. DOI
Bulte E., Gerking S., List J.A., de Zeeuw A. The effect of varying the causes of environmental problems on stated WTP values: Evidence from a field study. J. Environ. Econ. Manage. 2005;49:330–342. doi: 10.1016/j.jeem.2004.06.001. DOI
Lindhjem H., Navrud S. Using Internet in stated preference surveys: A review and comparison of survey modes. Int. Rev. Environ. Resour. Econ. 2011;5:309–351. doi: 10.1561/101.00000045. DOI
World Health Organization. Guidelines for Safe Recreational Water Environments. World Health Organization; Geneva, Switzerland: 2003. Coastal and Fresh Waters.
McMichael A.J., Campbell-Lendrum D., Kovats S., Edwards S., Wilkinson P., Wilson T., Nicholls R., Hales S., Tanser F., le Sueur D., Schlesinger M., Andronova N. Global Climate Change. In: Ezzati M., Lopez A., Roders A., Murray C.J.L., editors. Comparative Quantification of Health Risks, Global and Regional Burden of Disease Attributable to Selected Major Risk Factors. World Health Organization; Geneva, Switzerland: 2004. pp. 1543–1650.
Kovats R.S., Edwards S.J., Hajat S., Armstrong B.G., Ebi K.L., Menne B. The effect of temperature on food poisoning: A time-series analysis of salmonellosis in ten European countries. Epidemiol. Infect. 2004;132:443–453. doi: 10.1017/S0950268804001992. PubMed DOI PMC
Keim M.E. Building human resilience: The role of public health preparedness and response as an adaptation to climate change. Amer. J. Prev. Med. 2008;35:508–516. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2008.08.022. PubMed DOI
Ebi K.L. Resilience to the health risks of extreme weather events in a changing climate in the United States. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2011;8:4582–4595. doi: 10.3390/ijerph8124582. PubMed DOI PMC
European Environment Agency. The European Environment: State and Outlook 2010: Air Pollution. Publications Office of the European Union; Luxembourg, Luxembourg: 2010.
Alberini A., Gans W., Alhassan M. Individual and public-program adaptation: Coping with heat waves in five cities in Canada. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2011;8:4679–4701. doi: 10.3390/ijerph8124679. PubMed DOI PMC
European Environment Agency. Urban Adaptation to Climate Change in Europe: Challenges And Opportunities for Cities together with Supportive National and European Policies. Office for Official Publications of the European Union; Luxembourg, Luxembourg: 2012.
D’Ippoliti D., Michelozzi P., Marino C., de’Donato F., Menne B., Katsouyanni K., Kirchmayer U., Analitis A., Medina-Ramón M., Paldy A., Atkinson R., Kovats S., Bisanti L., Schneider A., Lefranc A., Iñiguez C., Perucci C.A. The impact of heat waves on mortality in 9 European cities: Results from the EuroHEAT project. Environ. Health. 2010;9:37. doi: 10.1186/1476-069X-9-37. PubMed DOI PMC
Barriopedro D., Fischer E.M., Luterbacher J., Trigo R.M., Garcia-Herrera R. The Hot summer of 2010: Redrawing the temperature record map of Europe. Science. 2011;332:220–224. doi: 10.1126/science.1201224. PubMed DOI
Bell M.L., Dominici F., Samet J.M. A meta-analysis of time-series studies of ozone and mortality with comparison to the national morbidity, mortality, and air pollution study. Epidemiology. 2005;16:436–445. doi: 10.1097/01.ede.0000165817.40152.85. PubMed DOI PMC
Medina-Ramón M., Zanobetti A., Cavanagh D.P., Schwartz J. Extreme temperatures and mortality: Assessing effect modification by personal characteristics and specific cause of death in a multi-city case-only analysis. Environ. Health Perspect. 2006;114:1331–1336. doi: 10.1289/ehp.9074. PubMed DOI PMC
Holland M., Amann M., Heyes C., Rafaj P., Schöpp W., Hunt A., Watkiss P. The Reduction in Air Quality Impacts and Associated Economic Benefits of Mitigation Policy: Summary of Results from the EC RTD ClimateCost Project. Technical Policy Briefing Note 6: Ancillary Air Quality Benefits. Stockholm Environment Institute; Stockholm, Sweden: 2011.
Kiulia O., Markandya A., Ščasný M., Menkyna Tsuchimoto F. The economic and environmental effects of taxing air pollutants and CO2: Lessons from a study of the Czech Republic. Rev. Environ. Econ. Policy. under review.
World Health Organization. The World Health Report 2002. World Health Organization; Geneva, Switzerland: 2002.
Patz J.A., Campbell-Lendrum D., Holloway T., Foley J.A. Impact of regional climate change on human health. Nature. 2005;438:310–317. PubMed
Tol R.S.J. The economic effects of climate change. J. Econ. Perspect. 2009;23:29–51. doi: 10.1257/jep.23.2.29. DOI
Nordhaus W.D. Estimates of the social cost of carbon: Background and results from the rice—2011 model. SSRN Electron. J. 2011
Anthoff D., Toll S.J.R. Climate Framework for Uncertainty, Negotiation and Distribution: Technical Description, Version 3.5. 2010. [(accessed on 3 September 2012)]. Available online: www.fund-model.org/versions.
Nordhaus W.D., Boyer J. Warming the World: Economic Models of Global Warming. MIT Press; Cambridge, MA, USA: 2000. Chapter 4.
Murray C.J.L., Lopez A.D. The Global Burden of Disease. Harvard University Press; Cambridge, MA, USA: 1996.
Cline W.R. The Economics of Global Warming. Institute for International Economics; Washington, DC, USA: 1992.
Navrud S. Valuing health impacts from air pollution in Europe. Environ. Resour. Econ. 2001;20:305–329. doi: 10.1023/A:1013099120078. DOI
Tolley G.S., Kenkel D.S., Fabian R.G. Valuing Health for Policy: An Economic Approach. University of Chicago Press; Chicago, IL, USA: 1994.
Viscusi W.K. The value of risks to life and health. J. Econ. Lit. 1993;31:1912–1946.
Robinson L.A. Policy monitor: How US government agencies value mortality risk reductions. Rev. Environ. Econ. Policy. 2007;1:283–299. doi: 10.1093/reep/rem018. DOI
Viscusi W.K., Aldy J.E. The value of a statistical life: A critical review of market estimates throughout the world. J. Risk Uncertainty. 2003;27:5–76. doi: 10.1023/A:1025598106257. DOI
Melichar J., Ščasný M., Urban J. Hodnocení smrtelných rizik na trhu práce: Studie hédonické mzdy pro Českou Republiku. (The valuation of risks in the labour market: Hedonic wage study in Czech Republic) Politická ekonomie. 2010;5:657–674.
Alberini A., Bateman I., Loomes G. Valuation of Environment—Related Health Risks for Children. OECD Publishing; Paris, France: 2010.
Alberini A., Ščasný M. Context and the VSL: Evidence from a stated preference study in Italy and the Czech Republic. Environ. Resour. Econ. 2011;49:511–538. doi: 10.1007/s10640-010-9444-8. DOI
Viscusi W.K. Fatal Tradeoffs: Public and Private Responsibilities for Risk. Oxford University Press; New York, NY, USA: 1992.
Kochi I., Hubbell B., Kramer R. An empirical Bayes approach to combining and comparing estimates of the value of a statistical life for environmental policy analysis. Environ. Resour. Econ. 2006;34:385–406. doi: 10.1007/s10640-006-9000-8. DOI
Mrozek J.R., Taylor L.O. What determines the value of life? A meta-analysis. J. Policy Anal. Manage. 2002;21:253–270. doi: 10.1002/pam.10026. DOI
de Blaeij A., Florax R.J.G.M., Rietveld P., Verhoef E. The value of statistical life in road safety: A meta-analysis. Accid. Anal. Prev. 2003;35:973–986. doi: 10.1016/S0001-4575(02)00105-7. PubMed DOI
Dekker T., Brouwer R., Hofkes M., Moeltner K. The effect of risk context on the value of a statistical life: A bayesian meta-model. Environ. Resour. Econ. 2011;49:597–624. doi: 10.1007/s10640-011-9456-z. DOI
Lindhjem H.V., Navrud S., Braathen N.A. Meta-Analysis of Stated Preference VSL Studies: Further Model Sensitivity and Benefit Transfer Issues. PIMAVE Technical Report. OECD; Paris, France: 2010.
Braathen N.A., Lindhjem H., Navrud S. Valuing Lives Saved from Environmental, Transport and Health Policies: A Meta-Analysis of Stated Preference Studies. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development; Paris, France: 2010.
Bateman I.J., Carson R.T., Day B., Hanemann M., Hanley N., Hett T., Jones-Lee M., Loomes G., Mourato S., Özdemiroglu E., Pearce D.W., Sugden R., Swanson J. Economic Valuation with Stated Preference Techniques: A Manual. Edward Elgar Publishing; Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA, USA: 2002.
Carson R.T., Louviere J.J. A common nomenclature for stated preference elicitation approaches. Environ. Resour. Econ. 2011;49:539–559. doi: 10.1007/s10640-010-9450-x. DOI
Alriksson S., Oberg T. Conjoint analysis for environmental evaluation—A review of methods and applications. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2008;15:244–257. doi: 10.1065/espr2008.02.479. PubMed DOI
Hanley N., Mourato S., Wright R.E. Choice modelling approaches: A superior alternative for environmental valuation? J. Econ. Surv. 2001;15:435–62.
Alberini A., Longo A., Veronesi M. Basic Statistical Models for Conjoint Choice Experiments. In: Kanninen B., editor. Valuing Environmental Amenities using Choice Experiments: A Common Sense Guide to Theory and Practice. Springer; Darmstadt, Germany: 2007.
Lusk J.L., Norwood F.B. Effect of experimental design on choice-based conjoint valuation estimates. Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 2005;87:771–785. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8276.2005.00761.x. DOI
Alberini A., Tonin S., Turvani M., Chiabai A. Paying for permanence: Public preferences for contaminated site cleanup. J. Risk Uncertainty. 2007;34:155–178. doi: 10.1007/s11166-007-9007-8. DOI
Swait J. Advanced Choice Models. In: Kanninen B., editor. Valuing Environmental Amenities using Choice Experiments: A Common Sense Guide to Theory and Practice. Springer; Darmstadt, Germany: 2007.
Tsuge T., Kishimoto A., Takeuchi K. A choice experiment approach to the valuation of mortality. J. Risk Uncertainty. 2005;31:73–95. doi: 10.1007/s11166-005-2931-6. DOI
Itaoka K., Saito A., Krupnick A., Adamowicz W., Taniguchi T. The effect of risk characteristics on the willingness to pay for mortality risk reductions from electric power generation. Environ. Resour. Econ. 2006;33:371–398. doi: 10.1007/s10640-005-3605-1. DOI
Alberini A., Ščasný M., Guignet D., Tonin S. Cancer values of prevented fatalities (VPFs), one size does not fit all: The benefits of contaminated site cleanups in Italy. J. AirWaste Manage. Assoc. 2012;62:783–798. doi: 10.1080/10962247.2012.676594. PubMed DOI
Tonin S., Alberini A., Turvani M. The Value of Reducing cancer Risks at Contaminated Sites: Are More Heavily Exposed People Willing to Pay More? Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei; Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei: 2009. [(accessed on 13 September 2012)]. Available online: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1445377.
Campbell D., Hutchinson W.G., Scarpa R. Incorporating discontinuous preferences into the analysis of discrete choice experiments. Environ. Resour. Econ. 2008;41:401–417. doi: 10.1007/s10640-008-9198-8. DOI
Moore M.J., Viscusi W.K. The quantity-adjusted value of life. Econ. Inq. 1988;26:369–388.
Desaigues B., Ami D., Hutchison M., Rabl A., Chilton S., Metcalf H., Hunt A., Ortiz R., Navrud S., Kaderjak P., Szántó R., Seested Nielsen J., Jeanrenaud C., Pellegrini S., Braun Kohlová M., Ščasný M., Vojtěch M., Urban J., Stoeckel M., Bartczak A., Markiewicz O., Riera P., Farreras V. 2007. Deliverable D6.7—Final Report on the Monetary Valuation of Mortality and Morbidity Risks from Air Pollution. Sixth Framework Programme of DG Research European Commission (Project No 502687 “New Energy Externalities Developments for Sustainability” [NEEDS])
Alberini A., Ščasný M., Braun Kohlová M., Melichar J. The Value of a Statistical Life in the Czech Republic: Evidence from a Contingent Valuation Study. In: Menne B., Ebi K.L., editors. Climate Change Adaptation Strategies for Europe. Springer; Darmstadt, Germany: 2006.
Giergiczny M. Value of a statistical life—The case of Poland. Environ. Resour. Econ. 2008;41:209–221. doi: 10.1007/s10640-007-9188-2. DOI
asný M., Urban J. Application of the Hedonic Wage Model: Value of Statistical Life Derived from Employee’s Choice in the Czech Labor Marke. In: Ščasný M., Braun Kohlová M., editors. Modelling of Consumer Behaviour and Wealth Distribution. Matfyzpress; Praha, Czech Republic: 2008. pp. 125–145.