Comparison of the cellular composition of two different chondrocyte-seeded biomaterials and the results of their transplantation in humans
Language English Country Czech Republic Media print
Document type Comparative Study, Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
PubMed
24594051
DOI
10.14712/fb2014060010001
PII: file/5997/fb2014a0001.pdf
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- MeSH
- Actins metabolism MeSH
- Arthroscopy MeSH
- Biocompatible Materials chemistry MeSH
- Biopsy MeSH
- Cell Differentiation MeSH
- Chondrocytes cytology transplantation MeSH
- Cartilage pathology MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Femur pathology MeSH
- Fibroblasts cytology MeSH
- Cohort Studies MeSH
- Knee pathology MeSH
- Hyaluronic Acid analogs & derivatives chemistry MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- S100 Proteins metabolism MeSH
- Tissue Engineering methods MeSH
- Cell Transplantation methods MeSH
- Check Tag
- Adult MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
- Comparative Study MeSH
- Names of Substances
- ACTA2 protein, human MeSH Browser
- Actins MeSH
- Biocompatible Materials MeSH
- hyaluronic acid benzyl ester MeSH Browser
- Hyaluronic Acid MeSH
- S100 Proteins MeSH
- S100A1 protein MeSH Browser
Our study compares the histological and immunohistochemical cellular composition of two different chondrocyte-seeded biomaterials and the results of their transplantation. Our study cohort included 21 patients, comprising 19 men and two women with a mean age of 32 years, who were affected by single chondral lesions of the femoral condyles. These patients were enrolled in our study and treated with arthroscopic implantation of the tissue Hyalograft C and/or Brno culture. Brno culture bioengineered with a fibrin-based scaffold contains round cells showing features of differentiated chondrocytes expressing S-100 protein and α-smooth muscle actin. In contrast, in the case of Hyalograft C, the scaffold was made up of a fibrillar network composed of biomaterial fibres of the esters of hyaluronic acid and cells resembling fibroblasts and myofibroblasts and expressing only α-smooth muscle actin. The average size of the defects was 2.5 cm2. Patients were evaluated using the standardized guidelines of the International Knee Documentation Committee. During the comparison of bioptic samples obtained from both patient cohorts, we did not observe any important differences in the histological makeup of the newly formed cartilage. The histological analysis of these two groups of homogeneous patients shows that this bioengineered approach, under proper indications, may offer favourable and stable clinical results over time, in spite of the different matrix and cellular composition of the two transplants used.
Department of Orthopedics Teaching Hospital Na Bulovce Prague Czech Republic
Department of Orthopedics University Hospital Motol Prague Czech Republic
Department of Otorhinolaryngology General University Hospital Prague Czech Republic
Department of Radiology Homolka Hospital Prague Czech Republic
Tissue Bank University Hospital Bohunice Brno Czech Republic
References provided by Crossref.org