INTRODUCTION: In spite of the progress in diagnosis and therapeutic options, esophageal perforation resulting in mediastinitis is a very serious condition with a high morbidity. AIM: To evaluate the use of esophageal stents for the treatment of patients suffering from mediastinitis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective (2008-2012) analysis of a group of patients requiring surgical treatment. The evaluation was focused on the cause of perforation, stent type and its parameters, the surgical method used, duration of stenting and total length of treatment. RESULTS: In total, 16 patients were treated by stenting. All patients were treated with the stent being placed across the defect in the esophagus. Mediastinitis was accessed and drained with the aid of a thoracotomy or thoracolaparotomy (8 cases), or using a combination of a laparotomy/laparostomy and pleural drainage (5 cases). The most basic interventions were either pleural or external cervical drainage (3 and 1 cases, respectively). One patient, in whom a stricture had developed at the healed perforation, was subjected to esophageal resection. Four patients died. The average period that the stent was left in situ was 53.7 days. The average period of hospitalization of those patients who survived was 53.4 days. CONCLUSIONS: Using stents in therapy neither increased survival (mortality of 25%), nor decreased the length of therapy of patients once mediastinitis had developed. The main advantage of stenting is the preservation of the native esophagus and the reduced extent of surgical mediastinal drainage.

Department of Surgery Charles University Teaching Hospital Plzen Czech Republic

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Brinster CJ, Singhal S, Lee L, et al. Evolving options in the management of esophageal perforation. Ann Thorac Surg. 2004;77:1475–83. PubMed

Port JL, Kent MS, Korst RJ, et al. Thoracic esophageal perforations: a decade of experience. Ann Thorac Surg. 2003;75:1071–4. PubMed

Vogel SB, Rout WR, Martin TD, Abbitt PL. Esophageal perforation in adults. Aggressive conservative treatment lowers morbidity and mortality. Ann Surg. 2005;241:1016–23. PubMed PMC

Vallböhmer D, Hölscher AH, Hölscher M, et al. Options in the management of esophageal perforation: analysis over a 12-year period. Dis Esophagus. 2010;23:185–90. PubMed

Mai C, Nagel M, Saeger HD. Surgical therapy of esophageal perforation. A determination of current status based on 4 personal cases and the literature. Chirurg. 1997;68:389–94. PubMed

Hermann J, Kościński T, Malinger S, et al. Strangulation of the stomach and the transverse colon following laparoscopic esophageal hiatal hernia repair. Videosurgery Miniinv. 2012;7:311–4. PubMed PMC

Griffith EA, Yap N, Poulter J, et al. Thirty-four cases of esophageal perforation: the experience of a district general hospital in the UK. Dis Esophagus. 2009;22:616–25. PubMed

Jougon J, Mc Bride T, Delcambre F, et al. Primary esophageal repair for Boerhaave's syndrome whatever the free interval between perforation and treatment. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2004;25:475–9. PubMed

Abbas G, Schuchert MJ, Pettiford BL, et al. Contemporaneous management of esophageal perforation. Surgery. 2009;146:749–55. PubMed

Gupta NM, Kaman L. Personal management of 57 consecutive patients with esophageal perforation. Am J Surg. 2004;187:58–63. PubMed

Castelguidone E, Merola S, Pinto A, et al. Esophageal injuries: spectrum of multidetector row CT findings. Eur J Radiol. 2006;59:344–8. PubMed

Minnich DJ, Yu P, Bryant AS, et al. Management of thoracic esophageal perforations. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2011;40:931–7. PubMed

Shields TW. Esophageal trauma. In: Shields TW, Licicero J III, Reed CE, Feins RH, editors. General thoracic surgery. 7th edition. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2009. pp. 2101–20.

Whyte RI, Iannettoni MD, Orringer MB. Intrathoracic esophageal perforation: the merit of primary repair. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1995;109:140–6. PubMed

Grillo HC, Wilkins EW., Jr Esophageal repair following late diagnosis of intrathoracic perforation. Ann Thorac Surg. 1975;20:387–99. PubMed

Eroglu A, Turkyilmaz A, Aydin Y, et al. Current management of esophageal perforation: 20 years experience. Dis Esophagus. 2009;22:374–80. PubMed

Wright CD, Mathisen DJ, Wain JC, et al. Reinforced primary repair of thoracic esophageal perforation. Ann Thorac Surg. 1995;60:245–9. PubMed

Wang N, Razzouk AJ, Safavi A, et al. Delayed primary repair of intrathoracic esophageal perforation: is it safe? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1996;111:114–22. PubMed

Richardson JD. Management of esophageal perforations: the value of aggressive treatment. Am J Surg. 2005;190:161–5. PubMed

Salminen P, Gullichsen R, Laine S. Use of self-expandable metal stents for the treatment of esophageal perforations and anastomotic leaks. Surg Endosc. 2009;23:1526–30. PubMed

Fischer A, Thomusch O, Benz S, et al. Nonoperative treatment of 15 benign esophageal perforations with self-expandable covered metal stents. Ann Thorac Surg. 2006;81:467–72. PubMed

Gelbmann CM, Ratiu NL, Rath HC, et al. Use of sef-expandable plastic stents for the treatment of esophageal perforations and symtomatic anastomotic leaks. Endoscopy. 2004;36:695–9. PubMed

Morgan RA, Ellul JP, Denton ER, et al. Malignant esophageal fistulas and perforations: management with plastic-covered metallic endoprotheses. Radiology. 1997;204:527–32. PubMed

Duda M, Adamcik L, Czudek S, et al. Miniinvazivní resení komplikaci v jicnové chirurgii. Slovenská Chirurgia. 2010;7:21–4.