Acting appropriately within social contexts requires an ability to appreciate others' mental and emotional states. Indeed, some campaign programs designed to reduce anti-social behaviour seek to elicit empathy for the victims. The effectiveness of these campaigns can be evaluated according to the degree to which they induce such responses, but by applying neuroscientific techniques this can be done at the behavioural and neurophysiological level. Neuroimaging studies aimed at identifying the neural mechanisms behind such socio-cognitive and -emotional processes frequently reveal the role of the superior temporal sulcus (STS). We applied this knowledge to assess the effectiveness of traffic-awareness campaign adverts to induce empathic expression. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data were acquired from 20 healthy male volunteers as they watched these campaign videos consisting of a dramatic sequence of events and catastrophic endings, and control videos without such dramatic endings. Among other structures, a significantly greater neural response was observed within bilateral STS, particularly within the right hemisphere, during the observation of campaign relative to control videos. Furthermore, activation in these brain regions correlated with the subjects' empathic expression. Our results develop our understanding of the role of STS in social cognition. Moreover, our data demonstrate the utility of neuroscientific methods when evaluating the effectiveness of campaign videos in terms of their ability to elicit empathic responses. Our study also demonstrates the utility of these specific stimuli for future neuroscientific research.

Behavioral and Social Neuroscience Research Group CEITEC Central European Institute of Technology Masaryk University Brno Czech Republic

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Masten CL, Morelli SA, Eisenberger NI. An fMRI investigation of empathy for ‘social pain’ and subsequent prosocial behavior. Neuroimage. 2011;55:381–388. PubMed

Rameson LT, Morelli SA, Lieberman MD. The neural correlates of empathy: experience, automaticity, and prosocial behavior. J Cogn Neurosci. 2012;24:235–245. PubMed

Eisenberg N, Eggum ND, Di Giunta L. Empathy‒related responding: associations with prosocial behavior, aggression, and intergroup relations. Soc Issues Policy Rev. 2010;4:143–180. PubMed PMC

Feshbach ND, Feshbach S. In: The Social Neuroscience of Empathy. Decety J, Ickes W, editor. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press; 2009. Empathy and Education.

Gallagher HL, Frith CD. Functional imaging of ‘theory of mind’. Trends Cogn Sci. 2003;7:77–83. PubMed

Krämer UM, Mohammadi B, Doñamayor N, Samii A, Münte TF. Emotional and cognitive aspects of empathy and their relation to social cognition–an fMRI-study. Brain Res. 2010;1311:110–120. PubMed

Peelen MV, Atkinson AP, Vuilleumier P. Supramodal representations of perceived emotions in the human brain. J Neurosci. 2010;30:10127–10134. PubMed PMC

Lamm C, Decety J, Singer T. Meta-analytic evidence for common and distinct neural networks associated with directly experienced pain and empathy for pain. Neuroimage. 2011;54:2492–2502. PubMed

Dziobek I, Preissler S, Grozdanovic Z, Heuser I, Heekeren HR, Roepke S. Neuronal correlates of altered empathy and social cognition in borderline personality disorder. Neuroimage. 2011;57:539–548. PubMed

Pennebaker JW. The Secret Life of Pronouns: What Our Words Say About Us. New York: Bloomsbury Press; 2011.

Bzdok D, Langner R, Hoffstaedter F, Turetsky BI, Zilles K, Eickhoff SB. The modular neuroarchitecture of social judgments on faces. Cereb Cortex. 2012;22:951–961. PubMed PMC

Moll J, de Oliveira-Souza R, Garrido GJ, Bramati IE, Caparelli-Daquer EMA, Paiva ML, Zahn R, Grafman J. The self as a moral agent: Linking the neural bases of social agency and moral sensitivity. Soc Neurosci. 2007;2:336–352. PubMed

Wang Y, Ramsey R, de Hamilton AF. The control of mimicry by eye contact is mediated by medial prefrontal cortex. J Neurosci. 2011;31:12001–12010. PubMed PMC

Winston JS, Strange BA, O’Doherty J, Dolan RJ. Automatic and intentional brain responses during evaluation of trustworthiness of faces. Nat Neurosci. 2002;5:277–283. PubMed

Pelphrey KA, Morris JP, McCarthy G. Neural basis of eye gaze processing deficits in autism. Brain. 2005;128:1038–1048. PubMed

Suda M, Takei Y, Aoyama Y, Narita K, Sakurai N, Fukuda M, Mikuni M. Autistic traits and brain activation during face-to-face conversations in typically developed adults. PLoS One. 2011;6:e20021. PubMed PMC

Müller JL, Gänssbauer S, Sommer M, Döhnel K, Weber T, Schmidt-Wilcke T, Hajak G. Gray matter changes in right superior temporal gyrus in criminal psychopaths. Evidence from voxel-based morphometry. Psychiatry Res. 2008;163:213–222. PubMed

Tamura M, Moriguchi Y, Higuchi S, Hida A, Enomoto M, Umezawa J, Mishima K. Neural network development in late adolescents during observation of risk-taking action. PLoS One. 2012;7:e39527. PubMed PMC

Andersen RA. Inferior parietal lobule function in spatial perception and visuomotor integration. Compr Physiol. 2011;Supplement 5:483–518. Handbook of Physiology, The Nervous System, Higher Functions of the Brain.

Calder AJ, Beaver JD, Winston JS, Dolan RJ, Jenkins R, Eger E, Henson RN. Separate coding of different gaze directions in the superior temporal sulcus and inferior parietal lobule. Curr Biol. 2007;17:20–25. PubMed PMC

Decety J. The neuroevolution of empathy. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2011;1231:35–45. PubMed

Decety J, Michalska KJ, Akitsuki Y, Lahey B. Atypical empathic responses in adolescents with aggressive conduct disorder: a functional MRI investigation. Biol Psychol. 2009;80:203–211. PubMed PMC

Klimecki OM, Leiberg S, Lamm C, Singer T. Functional neural plasticity and associated changes in positive affect after compassion training. Cereb Cortex. 2013;23:1552–1561. PubMed

Shirtcliff EA, Vitacco MJ, Graf AR, Gostisha AJ, Merz JL, Zahn-Waxler C. Neurobiology of empathy and callousness: implications for the development of antisocial behavior. Behav Sci Law. 2009;27:137–171. PubMed PMC

Hadjikhani N, Hoge R, Snyder J, de Gelder B. Pointing with the eyes: the role of gaze in communicating danger. Brain Cogn. 2008;68:1–8. PubMed PMC

Grèzes J, Pichon S, de Gelder B. Perceiving fear in dynamic body expressions. Neuroimage. 2007;35:959–967. PubMed

Lahnakoski JM, Glerean E, Salmi J, Jääskeläinen IP, Sams M, Hari R, Nummenmaa L. Naturalistic FMRI mapping reveals superior temporal sulcus as the hub for the distributed brain network for social perception. Front Hum Neurosci. 2012;6:1–14. PubMed PMC

Zaki J, Ochsner K. The neuroscience of empathy: progress, pitfalls and promise. Nat Neurosci. 2012;15:675–680. PubMed

Kriegeskorte N, Simmons WK, Bellgowan PS, Baker CI. Circular analysis in systems neuroscience: the dangers of double dipping. Nat Neurosci. 2009;12:535–540. PubMed PMC

Kriegeskorte N, Lindquist MA, Nichols TE, Poldrack RA, Vul E. Everything you never wanted to know about circular analysis, but were afraid to ask. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2010;30:1551–1557. PubMed PMC

Vul E, Harris C, Winkielman P, Pashler H. Puzzlingly high correlations in fMRI studies of emotion, personality, and social cognition. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2009;4:274–290. PubMed

Turner C, McClure R. Age and gender differences in risk-taking behaviour as an explanation for high incidence of motor vehicle crashes as a driver in young males. Inj Control Saf Promot. 2003;10:123–130. PubMed

Waylen AE, McKenna FP. Risky attitudes towards road use in pre-drivers. Accid Anal Prev. 2008;40:905–911. PubMed

A neuroscientific evaluation of driver rehabilitation: Functional neuroimaging demonstrates the effectiveness of empathy induction in altering brain responses during social information processing