Ferrate(VI)-prompted removal of metals in aqueous media: mechanistic delineation of enhanced efficiency via metal entrenchment in magnetic oxides
Language English Country United States Media print-electronic
Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
PubMed
25607569
DOI
10.1021/es5048683
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- MeSH
- Water Pollutants, Chemical chemistry isolation & purification MeSH
- Water Purification methods MeSH
- X-Ray Diffraction MeSH
- Photoelectron Spectroscopy MeSH
- Cations chemistry MeSH
- Hydrogen-Ion Concentration MeSH
- Magnetite Nanoparticles chemistry MeSH
- Potassium Compounds chemistry MeSH
- Iron Compounds chemistry MeSH
- Spectroscopy, Mossbauer MeSH
- Metals, Heavy chemistry isolation & purification MeSH
- Water MeSH
- Ferric Compounds chemistry MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
- Names of Substances
- Water Pollutants, Chemical MeSH
- ferric oxide MeSH Browser
- Cations MeSH
- Magnetite Nanoparticles MeSH
- potassium ferrate MeSH Browser
- Potassium Compounds MeSH
- Iron Compounds MeSH
- Metals, Heavy MeSH
- Water MeSH
- Ferric Compounds MeSH
The removal efficiency of heavy metal ions (cadmium(II), Cd(II); cobalt(II), Co(II); nickel(II), Ni(II); copper(II), Cu(II)) by potassium ferrate(VI) (K2FeO4, Fe(VI)) was studied as a function of added amount of Fe(VI) (or Fe) and varying pH. At pH = 6.6, the effective removal of Co(II), Ni(II), and Cu(II) from water was observed at a low Fe-to-heavy metal ion ratio (Fe/M(II) = 2:1) while a removal efficiency of 70% was seen for Cd(II) ions at a high Fe/Cd(II) weight ratio of 15:1. The role of ionic radius and metal valence state was explored by conducting similar removal experiments using Al(III) ions. The unique combination of X-ray diffraction (XRD), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), in-field Mössbauer spectroscopy, and magnetization measurements enabled the delineation of several distinct mechanisms for the Fe(VI)-prompted removal of metal ions. Under a Fe/M weight ratio of 5:1, Co(II), Ni(II), and Cu(II) were removed by the formation of MFe2O4 spinel phase and partially through their structural incorporation into octahedral positions of γ-Fe2O3 (maghemite) nanoparticles. In comparison, smaller sized Al(III) ions got incorporated easily into the tetrahedral positions of γ-Fe2O3 nanoparticles. In contrast, Cd(II) ions either did not form the spinel ferrite structure or were not incorporated into the lattic of iron(III) oxide phase due to the distinct electronic structure and ionic radius. Environmentally friendly removal of heavy metal ions at a much smaller dosage of Fe than those of commonly applied iron-containing coagulants and the formation of ferrimagnetic species preventing metal ions leaching back into the environment and allowing their magnetic separation are highlighted.
References provided by Crossref.org