• This record comes from PubMed

Percutaneous Epicardial Pacing using a Novel Insulated Multi-electrode Lead

. 2015 Aug ; 1 (4) : 273-283.

Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE Language English Country United States Media print

Document type Journal Article

Grant support
T32 HL007111 NHLBI NIH HHS - United States

INTRODUCTION: Epicardial cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) permits unrestricted electrode positioning. However, this requires surgical placement of device leads and the risk of unwanted phrenic nerve stimulation. We hypothesized that shielded electrodes can capture myocardium without extracardiac stimulation. METHODS: In 6 dog and 5 swine experiments, we used a percutaneous approach to access the epicardial surface of the heart, and deploy novel leads housing multiple electrodes with selective insulation. Bipolar pacing thresholds at prespecified sites were tested compare electrode threshold data both facing towards and away from the epicardial surface. RESULTS: In 151 paired electrode recordings (70 in 6 dogs; 81 in 5 swine), thresholds facing myocardium were lower than facing away (median [IQR] mA: dogs 0.9 [0.4-1.6] vs 4.6 [2.1 to >10], p<0.0001; swine 0.5 [0.2-1] vs 2.5 [0.5-6.8], p<0.0001). Myocardial capture was feasible without extracardiac stimulation at all tested sites, with mean ± SE threshold margin 3.6±0.7 mA at sites of high output extracardiac stimulation (p=0.004). CONCLUSION: Selective electrode insulation confers directional pacing to a multielectrode epicardial pacing lead. This device has the potential for a novel percutaneous epicardial resynchronization therapy that permits placement at an optimal pacing site, irrespective of the anatomy of the coronary veins or phrenic nerves.

See more in PubMed

Bradley DJ, Bradley EA, Baughman KL, et al. Cardiac resynchronization and death from progressive heart failure: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. JAMA: the journal of the American Medical Association. 2003;289:730–40. PubMed

Epstein AE, DiMarco JP, Ellenbogen KA, et al. 2012 ACCF/AHA/HRS focused update incorporated into the ACCF/AHA/HRS 2008 guidelines for device-based therapy of cardiac rhythm abnormalities: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2013;61:e6–75. PubMed

DeSimone CV, Friedman PA, Noheria A, et al. Stroke or transient ischemic attack in patients with transvenous pacemaker or defibrillator and echocardiographically detected patent foramen ovale. Circulation. 2013;128:1433–41. PubMed

McLeod CJ, Attenhofer Jost CH, Warnes CA, et al. Epicardial versus endocardial permanent pacing in adults with congenital heart disease. Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology: an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing. 2010;28:235–43. PubMed

Brignole M, Auricchio A, Baron-Esquivias G, et al. 2013 ESC Guidelines on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy: the Task Force on cardiac pacing and resynchronization therapy of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Developed in collaboration with the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) European heart journal. 2013;34:2281–329. PubMed

Sosa E, Scanavacca M, d’Avila A, Pilleggi F. A new technique to perform epicardial mapping in the electrophysiology laboratory. Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology. 1996;7:531–6. PubMed

Syed F, Lachman N, Christensen K, et al. The Pericardial Space: Obtaining Access and an Approach to Fluoroscopic Anatomy. Cardiac Electrophysiology Clinics. 2010;2:9–23. PubMed

Lachman N, Syed FF, Habib A, et al. Correlative anatomy for the electrophysiologist, Part I: the pericardial space, oblique sinus, transverse sinus. Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology. 2010;21:1421–6. PubMed

Zenati MA, Bonanomi G, Chin A, Schwartzman D. Left heart pacing lead implantation using subxiphoid videopericardioscopy. Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology. 2003;14:949–53. PubMed

Hsia TY, Bradley SM, LaPage MJ, et al. Novel minimally invasive, intrapericardial implantable cardioverter defibrillator coil system: a useful approach to arrhythmia therapy in children. The Annals of thoracic surgery. 2009;87:1234–8. discussion 1238–9. PubMed

Ota T, Schwartzman D, Zenati MA. Subxiphoid epicardial left ventricular pacing lead placement is feasible. The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery. 2010;139:1661–2. PubMed

Mizuno H, Maccabelli G, Della Bella P. The utility of manually controlled steerable sheath in epicardial mapping and ablation procedure in patients with ventricular tachycardia. Europace: European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology: journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology. 2012;14(Suppl 2):ii19–ii23. PubMed

Lachman N, Syed FF, Habib A, et al. Correlative anatomy for the electrophysiologist, part II: cardiac ganglia, phrenic nerve, coronary venous system. Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology. 2011;22:104–10. PubMed

Biffi M, Exner DV, Crossley GH, et al. Occurrence of phrenic nerve stimulation in cardiac resynchronization therapy patients: the role of left ventricular lead type and placement site. Europace: European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology: journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology. 2013;15:77–82. PubMed

Goetze S, Defaye P, Bauer A, et al. Phrenic nerve stimulation in CRT patients and benefits of electronic lead repositioning: the ERACE trial. Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology: an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing. 2013;38:1–9. PubMed

Biffi M, Boriani G. Phrenic stimulation management in CRT patients: are we there yet? Current opinion in cardiology. 2011;26:12–6. PubMed

Huizar JF, Kaszala K, Koneru JN, Thacker LR, Ellenbogen KA. Comparison of different pacing strategies to minimize phrenic nerve stimulation in cardiac resynchronization therapy. Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology. 2013;24:1008–14. PubMed PMC

Biffi M, Moschini C, Bertini M, et al. Phrenic stimulation: a challenge for cardiac resynchronization therapy. Circulation Arrhythmia and electrophysiology. 2009;2:402–10. PubMed

Biffi M, Bertini M, Ziacchi M, et al. Management of phrenic stimulation in CRT patients over the long term: still an unmet need ? Pacing and clinical electrophysiology: PACE. 2011;34:1201–8. PubMed

Sangaralingham SJ, Burnett JC, Jr, McKie PM, Schirger JA, Chen HH. Rationale and design of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy of B-type natriuretic Peptide for the preservation of left ventricular function after anterior myocardial infarction. Journal of cardiac failure. 2013;19:533–9. PubMed PMC

Biffi M, Zanon F, Bertaglia E, et al. Short-spaced dipole for managing phrenic nerve stimulation in patients with CRT: the “phrenic nerve mapping and stimulation EP” catheter study. Heart rhythm: the official journal of the Heart Rhythm Society. 2013;10:39–45. PubMed

Hjortshoj S, Heath F, Haugland M, et al. Long pacing Pulses Reduce Phrenic Nerve Stimulation in Left Ventricular Pacing. Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology. 2013 PubMed

Cha YM, Rea RF, Wang M, et al. Response to cardiac resynchronization therapy predicts survival in heart failure: a single-center experience. Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology. 2007;18:1015–9. PubMed

Chung ES, Leon AR, Tavazzi L, et al. Results of the Predictors of Response to CRT (PROSPECT) trial. Circulation. 2008;117:2608–16. PubMed

Ypenburg C, van Bommel RJ, Borleffs CJ, et al. Long-term prognosis after cardiac resynchronization therapy is related to the extent of left ventricular reverse remodeling at midterm follow-up. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2009;53:483–90. PubMed

Tse HF, Lee KL, Wan SH, et al. Area of left ventricular regional conduction delay and preserved myocardium predict responses to cardiac resynchronization therapy. Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology. 2005;16:690–5. PubMed

Singh JP, Fan D, Heist EK, et al. Left ventricular lead electrical delay predicts response to cardiac resynchronization therapy. Heart rhythm: the official journal of the Heart Rhythm Society. 2006;3:1285–92. PubMed

Delgado V, van Bommel RJ, Bertini M, et al. Relative merits of left ventricular dyssynchrony, left ventricular lead position, and myocardial scar to predict long-term survival of ischemic heart failure patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy. Circulation. 2011;123:70–8. PubMed

Abu Sham’a R, Buber J, Grupper A, et al. Effects of tricuspid valve regurgitation on clinical and echocardiographic outcome in patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy. Europace: European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology: journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology. 2013;15:266–72. PubMed

Killu AM, Grupper A, Friedman PA, et al. Predictors and outcomes of “super-response” to cardiac resynchronization therapy. Journal of cardiac failure. 2014;20:379–86. PubMed

Ploux S, Strik M, van Hunnik A, van Middendorp L, Kuiper M, Prinzen FW. Acute electrical and hemodynamic effects of multisite left ventricular pacing for cardiac resynchronization therapy in the dyssynchronous canine heart. Heart rhythm: the official journal of the Heart Rhythm Society. 2013 PubMed

DeSimone CV, Madhavan M, Venkatachalam KL, Knudson MB, Asirvatham SJ. Percutaneous autonomic neural modulation: a novel technique to treat cardiac arrhythmia. Cardiovascular revascularization medicine: including molecular interventions. 2013;14:144–8. PubMed

Kondo Y, Ueda M, Watanabe M, et al. Identification of left atrial ganglionated plexi by dense epicardial mapping as ablation targets for the treatment of concomitant atrial fibrillation. Pacing and clinical electrophysiology: PACE. 2013;36:1336–41. PubMed PMC

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...