Flecainide versus digoxin for fetal supraventricular tachycardia: Comparison of two drug treatment protocols
Language English Country United States Media print
Document type Comparative Study, Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
PubMed
27554948
DOI
10.1016/j.hrthm.2016.03.023
PII: S1547-5271(16)30043-1
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- Keywords
- Fetal supraventricular tachycardia, Fetal ultrasound, Prenatal treatment,
- MeSH
- Anti-Arrhythmia Agents administration & dosage blood MeSH
- Administration, Oral MeSH
- Digoxin administration & dosage blood MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Echocardiography MeSH
- Edema complications MeSH
- Flecainide administration & dosage blood MeSH
- Administration, Intravenous MeSH
- Clinical Protocols MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Young Adult MeSH
- Fetal Diseases diagnostic imaging drug therapy MeSH
- Retrospective Studies MeSH
- Tachycardia, Supraventricular classification complications diagnostic imaging drug therapy MeSH
- Pregnancy MeSH
- Fetal Therapies methods MeSH
- Ultrasonography, Prenatal MeSH
- Check Tag
- Adult MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Young Adult MeSH
- Pregnancy MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
- Comparative Study MeSH
- Names of Substances
- Anti-Arrhythmia Agents MeSH
- Digoxin MeSH
- Flecainide MeSH
BACKGROUND: The optimal treatment for fetal supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) with 1:1 atrioventricular relationship is unclear. OBJECTIVE: We compared the effectiveness of transplacental treatment protocols used in 2 centers. METHODS: Pharmacologic treatment was used in 84 fetuses. Maternal oral flecainide was the primary therapy in center 1 (n = 34) and intravenous maternal digoxin in center 2 (n = 50). SVT mechanism was classified by mechanical ventriculoatrial (VA) time intervals as short VA or long VA. Treatment success was defined as conversion to sinus rhythm (SR), or rate control, defined as >15% rate reduction. RESULTS: Short VA interval occurred in 67 fetuses (80%) and long VA in 17 (20%). Hydrops was present 28 of 84 (33%). For short VA SVT, conversion to SR was 29 of 42 (69%) for digoxin and 24 of 25 (96%) for flecainide (P = .01). For long VA SVT, conversion to SR and rate control was 4 of 8 (50%) and 0 of 8, respectively, for digoxin, and 6 of 9 (67%) and 2 of 9 (cumulative 89%) for flecainide (P = .13). In nonhydropic fetuses, digoxin was successful in 23 of 29 (79%) and flecainide in 26 of 27 (96%) (P = .10). In hydrops, digoxin was successful in 8 of 21 (38%), flecainide alone in 6 of 7 (86%, P = .07 vs digoxin), and flecainide ± amiodarone in 7 of 7 (100%) (P = .01). Intrauterine or neonatal death occurred in 9 of 21 hydropic fetuses treated with digoxin (43%), compared to 0 of 7 (P = .06) treated with flecainide. CONCLUSIONS: Flecainide was more effective than digoxin, especially when hydrops was present. No adverse fetal outcomes were attributed to flecainide.
References provided by Crossref.org