• This record comes from PubMed

Allosteric Effect of Adenosine Triphosphate on Peptide Recognition by 3'5'-Cyclic Adenosine Monophosphate Dependent Protein Kinase Catalytic Subunits

. 2016 Dec ; 35 (6) : 459-466.

Language English Country Netherlands Media print

Document type Journal Article

Links

PubMed 27848106
DOI 10.1007/s10930-016-9691-9
PII: 10.1007/s10930-016-9691-9
Knihovny.cz E-resources

The allosteric influence of adenosine triphosphate (ATP) on the binding effectiveness of a series of peptide inhibitors with the catalytic subunit of 3'5'-cyclic adenosine monophosphate dependent protein kinase was investigated, and the dependence of this effect on peptide structure was analyzed. The allosteric effect was calculated as ratio of peptide binding effectiveness with the enzyme-ATP complex and with the free enzyme, quantified by the competitive inhibition of the enzyme in the presence of ATP excess, and by the enzyme-peptide complex denaturation assay, respectively It was found that the principle "better binding-stronger allostery" holds for interactions of the studied peptides with the enzyme, indicating that allostery and peptide binding with the free enzyme are governed by the same specificity pattern. This means that the allosteric regulation does not include new ligand-protein interactions, but changes the intensity (strength) of the interatomic forces that govern the complex formation in the case of each individual ligand. We propose that the allosteric regulation can be explained by the alteration of the intrinsic dynamics of the protein by ligand binding, and that this phenomenon, in turn, modulates the ligand off-rate from its binding site as well as the binding affinity. The positive allostery could therefore be induced by a reduction in the enzyme's overall intrinsic dynamics.

See more in PubMed

Biochemistry. 1993 Dec 21;32(50):14015-22 PubMed

Pharmacol Res. 2015 Oct;100:1-23 PubMed

FEBS J. 2014 Jan;281(2):621-32 PubMed

J Biol Chem. 1997 Jan 17;272(3):1507-13 PubMed

Anal Biochem. 2013 Dec 1;443(1):52-7 PubMed

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Jan 15;105(2):506-11 PubMed

Biochem J. 2008 Jul 1;413(1):93-101 PubMed

Protein J. 2013 Oct;32(7):519-25 PubMed

Nat Chem Biol. 2012 Jan 15;8(3):246-52 PubMed

Eur Biophys J. 1984;11(2):103-9 PubMed

Nat Chem Biol. 2013 May;9(5):313-8 PubMed

J Biol Chem. 1973 Feb 25;248(4):1255-61 PubMed

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Apr 26;108(17):6969-74 PubMed

Biophys J. 1982 Oct;40(1):33-9 PubMed

Nature. 2007 Dec 13;450(7172):964-72 PubMed

Nat Chem Biol. 2010 Nov;6(11):821-8 PubMed

J Biol Chem. 1989 May 25;264(15):8802-10 PubMed

J Chem Inf Model. 2013 May 24;53(5):1223-8 PubMed

Nat Commun. 2014 Apr 24;5:3724 PubMed

J Biol Chem. 1983 Mar 25;258(6):3693-701 PubMed

J Biol Chem. 1975 Jun 10;250(11):4048-52 PubMed

Methods Enzymol. 2014;548:1-21 PubMed

Biochem J. 1985 Nov 1;231(3):655-61 PubMed

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...