The absence of effect of ganglionated plexi ablation on heart rate variability parameters in patients after thoracoscopic ablation for atrial fibrillation
Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE Jazyk angličtina Země Čína Médium print
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
PubMed
29312704
PubMed Central
PMC5757033
DOI
10.21037/jtd.2017.11.119
PII: jtd-09-12-4997
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- Ganglionated plexi (GP), atrial fibrillation (AF), heart rate variability (HRV), hybrid ablation,
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
BACKGROUND: Hybrid ablation [thoracoscopic ablation (TA) of atrial fibrillation (AF) followed by catheter ablation (CA)] is an increasingly common method of the treatment for patients with AF. The aim of this study was to assess the response to ganglionated plexi (GP) ablation in patients with a previous TA (i.e., to assess whether TA had resulted in damage to the GP. Heart rate variability (HRV) was used as a marker of the autonomic response. METHODS: Twenty AF patients underwent pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) plus GP ablation (GP group) and 18 AF patients underwent CA including GP ablation as a part of hybrid ablation (i.e., all patients had undergone a previous TA; Hybrid group). In each group, a 5 min electrocardiogram (ECG) obtained before and after the CA were analyzed. Time and frequency domain parameters were evaluated. RESULTS: Vagal responses (VR) during CA were observed in 12 (60%) patients in the GP group; however, in the Hybrid group, VR was not observed in any of the patients during CA. The change in normalized power in the low frequency (LF) component and the ratio between the LF and high frequency (LF/HF ratio) components of the HRV spectra, before and after ablation, were statistically significant in the GP group (3.3±2.6 before vs. 1.8±1.9 after ablation) but unchanged, before or after CA, in the Hybrid group. CONCLUSIONS: GP ablation in patients subsequent to TA has a little influence on HRV parameters, which could be explained by GP damage during the preceding TA.
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Wilber DJ, Pappone C, Augello G, et al. Comparison of antiarrhythmic drug therapy and radiofrequency catheter ablation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: A randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2010;303:333-40. 10.1001/jama.2009.2029 PubMed DOI
Jaïs P, Cauchemez B, Macle L, et al. Catheter ablation versus antiarrhythmic drugs for atrial fibrillation: the A4 study. Circulation 2008;118:2498-505. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.772582 PubMed DOI
January CT, Wann LS, Alpert JS, et al. 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS guideline for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society. J Am Coll Cardiol 2014;64:2246-80. 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.03.021 PubMed DOI
Katritsis DG, Pokushalov E, Romanov A, et al. Autonomic denervation added to pulmonary vein isolation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation a randomized clinical trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013;62:2318-25. 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.06.053 PubMed DOI
Armour JA, Murphy DA, Yuan BX, et al. Gross and microscopic anatomy of the human intrinsic cardiac nervous system. Anat Rec 1997;247:289-98. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0185(199702)247:2<289::AID-AR15>3.0.CO;2-L PubMed DOI
Takahashi K, Okumura Y, Watanabe I, et al. Anatomical proximity between ganglionated plexi and epicardial adipose tissue in the left atrium: implication for 3D reconstructed epicardial adipose tissue-based ablation. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 2016;47:203-12. 10.1007/s10840-016-0130-9 PubMed DOI
Pokushalov E, Romanov A, Katritsis DG, et al. Ganglionated plexus ablation vs linear ablation in patients undergoing pulmonary vein isolation for persistent/long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation: a randomized comparison. Heart Rhythm 2013;10:1280-6. 10.1016/j.hrthm.2013.04.016 PubMed DOI
Pokushalov E, Romanov A, Artyomenko S, et al. Ganglionated plexi ablation for longstanding persistent atrial fibrillation. Europace 2010;12:342-6. 10.1093/europace/euq014 PubMed DOI
Sztajzel J. Heart rate variability: a noninvasive electrocardiographic method to measure the autonomic nervous system. Swiss Med Wkly 2004;134:514-22. PubMed
Heart rate variability: standards of measurement, physiological interpretation, and clinical use. Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and the North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology. Circulation 1996;93:1043-65. 10.1161/01.CIR.93.5.1043 PubMed DOI
Gelsomino S, Van Breugel HN, Pison L, et al. Hybrid thoracoscopic and transvenous catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2014;45:401-7. 10.1093/ejcts/ezt385 PubMed DOI
Osmancik P, Budera P, Zdarska J, et al. Electrophysiological findings after surgical thoracoscopic atrial fibrillation ablation. Heart Rhythm 2016;13:1246-52. 10.1016/j.hrthm.2016.02.007 PubMed DOI
Tarvainen MP, Niskanen JP, Lipponen JA, et al. Kubios HRV – Heart rate variability analysis software. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 2014;113:210-20. 10.1016/j.cmpb.2013.07.024 PubMed DOI
Qin M, Liu X, Jiang WF, et al. Vagal response during pulmonary vein isolation: Re-recognized its characteristics and implications in lone paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Int J Cardiol 2016;211:7-13. 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.02.116 PubMed DOI
Katritsis DG, Giazitzoglou E, Zografos T, et al. Rapid pulmonary vein isolation combined with autonomic ganglia modification: A randomized study. Heart Rhythm 2011;8:672-8. 10.1016/j.hrthm.2010.12.047 PubMed DOI
Oswald H, Klein G, Koenig T, et al. Cryoballoon pulmonary vein isolation temporarily modulates the intrinsic cardiac autonomic nervous system. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 2010;29:57-62. 10.1007/s10840-010-9491-7 PubMed DOI
Tamborero D, Mont L, Berruezo A, et al. Left atrial posterior wall isolation does not improve the outcome of circumferential pulmonary vein ablation for atrial fibrillation: a prospective randomized study. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 2009;2:35-40. 10.1161/CIRCEP.108.797944 PubMed DOI
Chilukuri K, Scherr D, Dalal D, et al. Conventional pulmonary vein isolation compared with the “box isolation” method: a randomized clinical trial. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 2011;32:137-46. 10.1007/s10840-011-9587-8 PubMed DOI
Ketels S, Houben R, Van Beeumen K, et al. Incidence, timing, and characteristics of acute changes in heart rate during ongoing circumferential pulmonary vein isolation. Europace 2008;10:1406-14. 10.1093/europace/eun287 PubMed DOI
Wang K, Chang D, Chu Z, et al. Denervation as a common mechanism underlying different pulmonary vein isolation strategies for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: evidenced by heart rate variability after ablation. ScientificWorldJournal 2013;2013:569564. PubMed PMC
Suwalski G, Suwalski P, Kalisnik JM, et al. How does successful off-pump pulmonary vein isolation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation influence heart rate variability and autonomic activity? Innovations 2008;3:1-6. PubMed
Seaborn GE, Todd K, Kevin A., et al. Heart rate variability and procedural outcome in catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation. Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol 2014;19:23-33. 10.1111/anec.12098 PubMed DOI PMC